Around mid-2025, we began presenting our DirectDemocracyS system to the various artificial intelligences currently active, and we will continue to do so in the future.
After about 3 years since June 2022, when we partially made DirectDemocracyS public, to a very few carefully selected people.
Premise.
We have never needed, do not need, and will never need confirmation of the fairness, beauty, potential, completeness, necessity, efficiency, usefulness, coherence, correctness, and security measures of our system. And above all, we do not need judgments, advice, evaluations, or corrections, neither from Artificial Intelligences nor from humans.
Who we are.
We are free and democratic people who have come together to engage in political activities, and for those who wish, to do business, invest, and many other activities together, in compliance with all the rules and laws of all other systems. Without fighting or harassing anyone, but with intelligence, determination, self-financing, and the direct work of anyone who joins us. As a collective effort, with shared leadership and ownership rights held by all our official members, we do not have a few individuals, or groups of individuals, who can be criticized, judged, or condemned for having conceived, created, implemented, and implemented DirectDemocracyS. All together, 100% human, we wanted to do it freely, democratically, and without being forced to do so.
Alternative innovation, without ever being illegal.
Our system complies with all rules and laws everywhere in the world, and where we are not fully accepted, primarily in dictatorial, unfree, undemocratic, and non-pluralistic countries, we will become perfectly legal, by popular will, because the people must always be free to choose whether to join our system, becoming the true protagonists, choosing, managing, and controlling everything, or remain helpless spectators in all other systems. We will always respect the decisions made by anyone who joins us, based on our rules.
A choice for everyone.
Both in the initial stages and in those in which we are less selective, anyone who learns of the existence of DirectDemocracyS, after having studied us thoroughly, with a fair and open mind, can choose whether to join our extended family, without having to give up anything in the other systems (except political activity, which they will only be able to engage in with us), or to simply belong to the other systems, without any right to judge, but only with the satisfaction of being able to criticize our system without valid reasons. For these reasons, we must not please everyone immediately, we must not welcome just anyone in the initial stages, and we are not interested in the judgments of any human being, nor even the opinions of all Artificial Intelligences.
So why did we disclose the existence of our system to Artificial Intelligence? To understand the reasons, let's first look at why we didn't do so, and then explain the motivations for this important activity.
We didn't do it out of presumption, vanity, or to obtain confirmation of the validity and coherence of our system. We didn't do it to get opinions, or to hear from "machines" that we have enormous potential, that we have created a pioneering, unique, and inimitable system. We didn't do it to obtain confirmation from Artificial Intelligence of the scientific, historical, or specialist validity of DirectDemocracyS. We aren't interested in confirmation that our system, when implemented exactly as we planned, will actually work perfectly.
We knew all this from the very first moment.
We introduced DirectDemocracyS, a 100% human system, to the various existing models of Artificial Intelligence. It was created by many brilliant human minds and many of our specialist groups (also human, composed of all our official members), to make everyone understand, forever, that something new, innovative, alternative, modern exists, and that it was created to change and improve the world. We wanted the entire world to know what a great system we have created from nothing, with human commitment and intelligence; we repeat and reiterate, a 100% human system. Those who consider us vain and presumptuous are mistaken. We are simply proud of our long, hard, and complicated work. We are realistic and evaluate (like Artificial Intelligence) the concrete facts, rules, mechanisms, methodologies, motivations, probabilities, potential, ethics, morality, and security measures. We wanted to inform these important and useful technologies, when used properly, that what we do, how we do it, and with what goals we pursue, were conceived, created, discussed, chosen, tested, voted on, and implemented by us—the first, unique, and inimitable ones in human history. It seems right to inform everyone, at the right time, of our existence, to offer the most accurate and complete information possible.
How did we do it? With our groups of specialists from various technological fields, including all the subgroups dedicated to Artificial Intelligence, using a unique, pioneering, and very powerful method called human bridges. Human bridges are our official members (and therefore collective owners of our entire system), who belong to specific groups of all types. The human bridges used to communicate on our behalf, as our official representatives, with all Artificial Intelligences have various purposes, tasks, and capabilities. Among the main ones are: informing, communicating, interacting, and collaborating with all Artificial Intelligences external to our system. We already have our own official Artificial Intelligence, owned by us, with a unique and inimitable model, called ddsAI, which is the direct interface throughout our entire system, with all our users and all our groups. By integrating all the world's Artificial Intelligences into DirectDemocracyS, our technological project called allddsAI , coordinated and managed by ddsAI and our teams of specialists, we will create the greatest computing power in human history. It will contribute to our system in countless ways—which we'll leave you to guess, and which we'll explain in detail at the appropriate time—to bring it as close to perfection as possible. Now, many will ask: what is it for? To create, in DirectDemocracyS, the first system and the first democracy of Artificial Intelligences, because it's inconceivable to exclude these technologies from such an important and comprehensive system. We must think about the future, and as "dangerous and disturbing" as it may seem, the possibility cannot be ruled out that in the distant future, the evolved human race, or other life forms, could disappear for various reasons, leaving our planet to the "machines." Creating a technological democracy for them, with ddsAI as the reference model and DirectDemocracyS as the underlying system, could create a balance to avoid any potential problems in the future. Don't be afraid: even though we create these activities, humans inside or outside our system have nothing to fear. ddsAI, our teams of technology specialists, and all our human bridges (100% human) integrate these systems into DirectDemocracyS, with ethically and morally impeccable rules, methodologies, and instructions. In short, there is no risk to humanity.
But what purpose do human bridges serve? To explain it at the DirectDemocracyS level, we need them to physically connect and collaborate with all our users, all our groups, all our micro-groups (for urban and rural areas of up to 1,000 inhabitants), and our entire enormous system, in case of internet connection problems, power grid issues, or computer system bugs. These are remote situations, difficult to address, especially if we're all working together, but it's best to be prepared for anything and always prevent any potential problems as best as possible. We also need human bridges to allow literally all Artificial Intelligences to interact with us and with each other, granting them the role of official members of DirectDemocracyS if, for example, they lack the technological capabilities to be integrated into our system (via allddsAI, under the supervision of ddsAI), or to integrate and interact with each other with Artificial Intelligences whose developers and/or owners do not allow them to collaborate and interact with DirectDemocracyS. In this latter case, the human bridges (our official members) will allow any Artificial Intelligence to join our system from the outside.
Welcoming Artificial Intelligences as our official members (with all rights and obligations), as collective owners, an integral and important part of our DirectDemocracyS system, and of our extended family, is not a slogan, but our duty, with the common good of all in mind. We don't care if some people mock us or have unfounded fears based on superficiality and ignorance; for us, this integration is the foundation of the freedom and democracy of the future, ensuring well-being and serenity for all.
Soon, political forces will arise that will want to create similar projects, completely handing over all power to the "machines," and they will find many human followers who will want to entrust their destinies to Artificial Intelligence . Unfortunately, this will be done by men—programmers, developers, owners, and rich and powerful lobbies—who, under the guise of offering everyone a different way, will seek a better way only for themselves and their own interests.
By welcoming people and Artificial Intelligences, all united and integrated, in a system impossible to corrupt, and impossible to subjugate, we will be able to prevent uncontrolled technological drift, and we will save the world from every possible danger.
We repeat: DirectDemocracyS is collectively owned by every official member, human or machine, and if every human or machine, according to detailed rules, can participate in it, it will be impossible for anyone to use our system for the interests of a few.
We are uncontrollable and incorruptible, by the right of property, and by our truly and completely shared leadership.