To maintain this system, which is solid, fair, and welcoming to all, we have adopted clear methodologies that guide our decisions. Our rules don't limit ideas; they make them achievable. Without a shared framework, good intentions remain utopian; with it, they become laws and concrete actions for the common good.
We want to thank those who make our system possible. In this communication, we will explain not only our journey, but also the hows and whys of our decisions. Our door is open to anyone who wants to contribute, because we believe that sharing rules is the only real way to guarantee everyone's rights and opportunities. We want to publicly thank all our official members, who collectively own our entire system, including those in various countries around the world based on residency and citizenship, for their excellent work in proposing, discussing, selecting, testing, publishing, and implementing our national programs. We also want to thank our registered users with verified and guaranteed identities, who together make up our truly and fully shared leadership, in various countries around the world based on residency and citizenship. Together with our official members and higher-level users, they voted collectively, each for their own country, on our national programs. In the next phases, we will do exactly the same work for our local programs, from the largest geographical, territorial, administrative, and electoral subdivisions to the smallest, right down to our micro-groups.
These programs are the result of a great collective effort, both human and technological, perfectly integrated (with impeccable ethical and moral rules), which allows us to do good for all the various populations, everywhere in the world.
We've already said a lot about these programs, and clearly, at this link:
but there are some aspects to explain.
These are not final programs but are subject to modifications and numerous additions, since DirectDemocracyS is a system with a political organization that fully and immediately implements the only authentic direct democracy. In fact, if our official members in various countries wish to make changes, additions, or additions at any time, of any kind, in collaboration with and with the authorization (which they will easily obtain if all the requirements are met) of our continental organizations, they can do so. All our official members create the programs, propose additions and modifications, which will be voted on by the citizens and residents of each country, and all our identified users, in turn, will vote to approve the various versions, based on highly detailed, fair, just, secure, verifiable, and incorruptible voting rules.
Our programs are not propaganda; they aren't used to gain votes, nor to convince anyone to join us. With the premise that all our activities, including our programs, can evolve and improve, every single word of what we've decided together, with fair and equitable local autonomy, will be implemented exactly as we presented it. We don't give gifts, bonuses, or incomes for nothing. We don't buy the votes of incompetent people with unrealistic promises. Every single charitable activity undertaken by anyone must be deserved and therefore reciprocated, with work for the community and the common good.
Our programs are not utopian; they are all perfectly functional and can be implemented anywhere in the world, through our system, if we have the necessary votes to do so. Indeed, if we win the elections, we will govern and make laws in the common interest, without any kind of discrimination. If we lose, we will continue to advance our programs, as an alternative to other political forces.
We want to answer some short questions, with equally short answers.
Why haven't some countries published their programs? DirectDemocracyS has very detailed hierarchies, with international, continental, national, and local programs, from the largest to the smallest geographic, territorial, administrative, and electoral subdivisions, down to our micro-groups, for urban and rural areas, with up to 1,000 inhabitants. Each subdivision, and each of our organizations, will carry out numerous activities, including in many groups, our programs will be created, at every level, for every need. The programs are made public, in final, partial, or provisional versions, based on the decisions of the respective organizations and groups. Every country in the world has already created most of its own programs and will make them public in the manner, time, and in the areas decided by their respective members, after being voted on by their respective program voting groups. Our recommendation, which is not mandatory, is to publish as detailed a version as possible, on our blog, on our various subdomains, and exclusively on our websites and platforms.
Why does the English version state that the program is written in a different language? Each of our national organizations (and local ones will have very similar implementing rules) in every country around the world creates national programs on our platforms in their own national language (in many cases, in multiple national languages, when there are multiple national languages). When our programs are made public to all, in addition to the versions in each country's official languages, an English version is published so that it can be understood and automatically translated by everyone. The English version clearly specifies that the official version, binding for our entire system, is always the one in the official language(s), as the case may be. Simply put, to avoid any possible errors, the official language, or languages, are "more important" than the English version.
Why are the programs so similar? Did you create one and then adapt it to the various countries? As a reference for national programs, there are continental and international programs, but there's no obligation to have similar programs, although we encourage everyone to try to "steal" good ideas from our many activities and working groups. If a country implements a good idea, anyone within our organization can copy, integrate, adapt, and use it, always requesting and obtaining authorization, perhaps even publicly acknowledging the good work of the respective groups. Generally, our programs are very different, but they also have some similar ideas and projects.
Why do the programs contain so many references to DirectDemocracyS technology projects, especially Artificial Intelligence projects such as allddsAI and ddsAI? Did you write them with the help of Artificial Intelligences? Wasn't DirectDemocracyS a 100% human project? Each of our programs can contain references to many of our system's activities and projects, including technology projects and projects related to Artificial Intelligence. The programs, like most of our publications and activities, are written by human groups and published by human groups, after human proposals, discussions, selections, testing, and voting. Obviously, as we have always stated, technological projects and Artificial Intelligences will be implemented and integrated into our system, with security measures, rules, methodologies, instructions, and impeccable ethical and moral rationales. We would be foolish not to take advantage of the various technologies. DirectDemocracyS was a 100% human project in its initial stages, including its fundamental rules, and will continue to be controlled and managed primarily by humans, gradually integrating all necessary technologies. Our official Artificial Intelligence model is collectively owned by all our official members (so, potentially, ddsAI belongs to anyone who joins us and meets all the requirements). It's called ddsAI, and it's the official interface of DirectDemocracyS for all our users and all our groups. Our model has a technology and paradigm that allows for control of our dedicated technological groups, with human bridges, which make our model very useful, and allow it to integrate into allddsAI, literally all existing Artificial Intelligences, in a true democracy of Artificial Intelligences, modeled after our human system, and with continuous and complete control over the various algorithms (based on very detailed implementation rules) of our human groups, of which all our official members can be part, therefore potentially anyone.
You said you can always change your programs. Won't that make you look like other political forces, which almost always fail to fully and correctly implement the programs they received votes for in elections, as promised? DirectDemocracyS cannot be compared to other systems, and there is no similarity between our political organization and the old, failed, unjust, inequitable, unsafe, unreliable, disloyal, and often corrupt traditional political parties. They promise to gain votes, and only partially implement their promises and programs, not always in the common interest. We don't make promises; we present detailed programs, based on reality and truth. Obviously, unforeseen events can occur, or our official members, in the various groups of our organizations, find better ideas, always for the common good, and create projects and programs to integrate with existing ones. If better solutions were found, it would be foolish not to integrate them. Furthermore, there may be unforeseen circumstances beyond our control that could force us to change certain things. Therefore, change is not mandatory, but if necessary , we will do so, obviously based on the proposals and decisions of our official members, with the votes of our shared leadership, in the various countries and at the local level. Programs that are too rigid, inflexible to adapt to various, often unforeseen, situations would be a serious mistake. If a change is decided by our voters/users with verified and guaranteed identities on our platforms, we are obligated to always respect the will of those who join us, and of those who, by voting for us and our political representatives, confer upon us the honor of representing them in the various institutions.
Who can propose ideas, projects, and topics to integrate and improve the various programs, and thus advance and evolve your system? Literally anyone can submit any idea or project to DirectDemocracyS, both internationally, through this contact form at this link:
https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/infos-contacts/proposals
But also at the continental, national, and local levels, using the contact form for the various continents, countries, and geographic areas. Please specify in the previous contact form whether the proposals, ideas, and projects are for the various programs and which geographic area they are intended for. Alternatively, you can contact one of our continental, national, or local organizations, depending on your needs, by selecting the contact form category based on your citizenship and residence, at this link:
https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/contacts/groups-contacts/world-contacts
Always specify if the request is a proposal. We remind you that existing users, regardless of their type, are encouraged to access the dedicated contact website by entering your credentials, which are the same username and password you use on our free website, into the login form. After logging in, you'll receive faster, more complete, and detailed responses than our other visitors.
What happens with the proposals received? They are analyzed by the proposal management group, in one of the various subgroups based on the user type, or by the proposal analysis group, by our visitors. If the proposer is an official member of ours, they can automatically request and obtain an official representative profile (partially public) and create their own working group, together with our official members who wish to collaborate on the development of the idea or project. If they don't know anyone to create the group, many of our members will surely want to join the respective group, which will be published in a group for new ideas and projects, along with the proposed idea or project, and will soon join the respective group. If necessary, new, more specific groups will soon be created by the members of the respective working group, who have also become official representatives, to allow for more detailed, comprehensive, professional, and secure work, with human and technological bridges for everyone to communicate and collaborate. It is recommended not to create groups that are too large in terms of number of members, to allow everyone to always have a leading role.
What if the person submitting an idea is a simple visitor who hasn't joined us, or isn't a user or official member? No idea or project is discarded, but rather analyzed and evaluated based on various criteria. The best ideas will be chosen based on their importance and usefulness, assigning varying degrees of urgency and priority. In the groups for new ideas, projects, and proposals, various discussions will take place, and many of our members will be able to analyze the various ideas and contact the author of the respective proposal. Our visitors can choose to join us, or collaborate externally, or even have nothing to do with us, simply by submitting their proposal. If they join us as official members, they can continue the project development directly, according to the previous rules, creating their own working groups as an official representative. Good ideas bring important insights, which are very useful to our activities. If they don't wish to be our members, they can still stay in touch with our groups, which will develop their proposals.
How do I get credit for an idea or project, and therefore, can a proposal be named after the person who conceived, conceived, and brought it to fruition? To ensure credit for a proposal, we recommend anyone become an official member. The reason is simple but very important: collective ownership of our entire system, in addition to numerous advantages and benefits, allows access to a potentially infinite number of groups. This access to restricted areas allows you to check whether your idea and project have already been submitted and whether working groups are already developing your idea. If a working group for a proposal already exists, you can apply, and if you meet all the requirements, you can be admitted to the respective groups. Based on your concrete contribution, the final proposal will be voted on according to very detailed implementation rules. In this way, based on your active and direct participation in the respective groups, you will receive personal and group points, which are the best recognition for your work because they provide numerous advantages and benefits. If your proposal hasn't yet been submitted and is original, you can become an official member and create a main working group to discuss, improve, and finalize your personal proposal. You can use your name or surname (or, to remain anonymous, your nickname or username) to submit your idea. This will obviously result in a higher number of points, as it is an original activity. To avoid wasting time and precious resources, and because it is fair and just, DirectDemocracyS creates a single working group for each idea, at each level, based on very detailed implementation rules. This group can also create numerous subgroups, connected by human and technological bridges, to enable collective, orderly, organized, safe, secure, and coordinated work, while ensuring proper recognition for the original creator of each idea. We recommend becoming an official member to ensure, through personal verification, that your proposal is truly unique and original, and to obtain authorship, credit, recognition, and appropriate rewards. Lower-tier users, or even simple visitors, cannot verify and directly implement the various ideas and projects, as they lack access to our reserved areas, which are tailored to their specific user types . Simply put, we reward only our members, and therefore collectively own our entire system, and we allow only our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities, to vote on all our decisions and elections, which are binding and official, for our entire system. Strict adherence to our shared rules is what allows us to protect the equality of all our members. Our inclusivity is not without criteria; on the contrary, it is precisely through our shared adherence to these standards that we ensure that no one is excluded and that every participant's voice has the same, invaluable value. This isn't discrimination, but rather the need to protect our system and everyone who participates in it. Anyone who requests it, if they meet all the requirements, can join us, even by creating a free personal profile, with no obligation to be present or volunteer. Any of our free users, if they wish and meet all the requirements, can request to become a registered user with a verified and guaranteed identity, and thus become part of our truly and fully shared leadership, voting on everything, in a manner binding on our system. Any user with a verified identity can request, and if they meet all the requirements, can obtain, the status of official member. This, through a single, non-cumulative, and non-transferable individual action, allows them to collectively own our entire system and have various types of profiles, based on our rules. Therefore, literally anyone can be part of our system, as long as they respect all our rules, which are collectively decided and respected by everyone, and which in turn are based on individual proposals, implemented in many groups. DirectDemocracyS is a system created, managed, and controlled collectively, so it's difficult to find flaws, and if there are any, everyone can directly contribute to changing and improving the world through our system.