Some of our public articles have raised a lot of controversy, and have also outraged many people, who do not know us, and are not part of our system.
First of all, a brief introduction.
DirectDemocracyS, has never been, is not, and will never be, against anything. We did not conceive and create all this, against anyone, or to change anything, or even to change anyone's mind. We are not interested, and we do not have time to waste, with stupid controversies, and we are not interested in fighting against other systems, and against those who are part of them.
If we criticize other systems, and those who are part of them, it is because we have different solutions, and certainly better, more just, fair, loyal, supportive, real, reliable and safe, than all the others.
Politically, we are not against any traditional political force, and against any political representative, of any political force.
Being us, for total freedom, and for authentic democracy, we cannot accept, in the world, forms of authoritarianism, dictatorships of any kind, single parties, single thoughts, manipulation, and brainwashing. This does not mean that we will fight against, or that we will make bloody revolutions, in our respective countries, but thanks to our rules, methodologies, and activities, we will favor, and help concretely, in every way, the populations that want to put an end to oppressive forms of government.
We repeat it continuously: we, in our system, rely on reality documented by reliable sources, and verified by our groups of specialists, also with our private technologies, and Artificial Intelligence created by our experts, on the truth (which is not our truth, but the incontestable one, documented, and verifiable by anyone), on logic, on common sense, on study, and on mutual respect, of all people.
We also always repeat the following sentence, but many pretend not to know that DirectDemocracyS is innovative, and alternative, to everything that has existed, and that will exist in the future.
Let us start with the controversy.
We have written a few times, in an overly critical manner, against those who declare themselves an anti-system.
The anti-system people, and the conspiracy theorists, often identified with the same people, are disappointed, and angry, because we allowed ourselves to say, that with their behaviors, and with their theories, without any foundation, they do nothing but strengthen the old systems. Always saying no to everything, and having a hatred towards others, is not part of our working method. Hating the Western system, the partially democratic countries, and their leaders, is not in our style, moreover, if you criticize something, anything, you must offer credible and better solutions. The fact that many of them, in order to fight Western systems, sympathize with dictators, and with authoritarian systems, single parties, and single thoughts, characterizes them as stupid, for two simple reasons: the first is that they offer worse solutions than those they criticize, the second reason, is that they have no innovative and alternative project, to what in many cases, rightly, they contest. They could join us, and finally present an innovative alternative, different, and certainly better, than all the other systems. We are sure that soon, anti DirectDemocracyS groups will be born, also helped, financed, and supported, by all the other systems, by the various lobbies, and by other political forces. They will tell you many lies and will circulate false news about us. We advise you not to trust them, and to investigate yourselves, to discover the truth. Another piece of advice we give you is to always ask, even our version, before you get wrong ideas about our system.
We have written that much of the blame for the state of the world lies with the various voters in the various countries.
For us, it is wrong to blame all the world's problems only on the various systems and the old political forces, but a significant part of the blame must be attributed to those who, by voting or even not voting, have allowed many lobbies to control almost all political forces, creating problems that brought wealth, power and fame to those who did not deserve them. Staying on traditional social networks, complaining about the situation, without taking action to change and improve the world, is stupid, and makes everyone an accomplice, and therefore partially guilty, for the current situation. You have DirectDemocracyS, which offers you all the possibilities to move from useless words to concrete facts; therefore, from today you have no more excuses.
We have written that all groups that demand more power, for all the people, including that of making the various political representatives resign, are failures and will only create problems. We are against direct democracy of all the people, on all political forces, because it would create an incompetent world, and above all unjust.
It seems like a contradiction, we who are for total freedom, and for authentic democracy, the direct one, that we oppose, to give all the people, all the power, instead we have noticeably clear, simple, and indisputable motivations. We gave the example of an influencer, with many millions of fans, who perhaps has a political representative, who does his role very well, with excellent results, but who would be unpleasant to this famous influencer. With a system of direct democracy, without rules, he would only have to call a referendum, to have the competent political representative resign, and invite his supporters, to vote to force him to resign. It would be regular, because the majority of voters (also looking at the percentages of abstentionism), would vote to eliminate the competent political representative, and would make this influencer, a dictator, with popular support. But even by putting very restrictive rules, for the current lobbies that govern the world, it would not be difficult to find false evidence, or create some, and force anyone to resign, based on manipulations, and media brainwashing. We will never accept similar rules, only those who are part of our political organization, have the right / duty, to manage, control, and possibly make their political representative resign, because we have all the rules, methodologies, instructions, and security measures, to prevent any problem, and any execrable activity. Pure direct democracy, in which everyone decides on everything, is a utopia, and would only create problems, due to the lack of competence, of all citizens on the various issues to be decided. It would be a failure, and would not create economic growth and well-being, indeed it could create immense problems. Our direct democracy, with our groups of experts, and with the ethical and conscious use of new technologies, owned by anyone who joins us, provides for voting with users / voters fully, independently, freely, neutrally and competently informed, not only on the various possibilities, but on the expected consequences, for each of these possible decisions. Our groups of experts are composed of our official members, with demonstrated, documented and verified skills, who, being also owners of our entire system (like all our official members), have every interest in informing in a correct, loyal and useful way, to make all together, always and only, the best decisions. Our groups of experts, thanks also to very efficient security measures, and an incredibly detailed voting system, are incorruptible, cannot be extorted, nor manipulated, and therefore have no preference. In short, our system, however banal and in some cases utopian it may seem at first glance, is the only one capable of working, and it is not just us who say this, but anyone who studies us with an open mind.
We have been told that we are not legal, that we do not grow quickly, and that we will never have the consensus needed to be decisive. And if "by chance", we win the elections, we will become like everyone else, perhaps even worse. There are people who believe that we will establish the dictatorship of the majority, over the minority that will not vote for us, and that power will make us lose our sense of balance.
DirectDemocracyS are a few friends, who do politics, business, and invest together, creating a tiny system, we repeat, completely autonomous, self-financed, free, democratic, independent, and incorruptible. We all decide together, all our rules, and we work only and exclusively, legally, respecting all the Laws, and the rules. When these are unjust, we change them, for the good of all! We are registered from the first minute, wherever it is necessary, and all our activities are documented. Now, on June 24, 2025, we are tens of thousands of people, from all countries of the world, who are part of our system. Our growth is deliberately slow, and very controlled, to effectively prevent any possible problem. We can guarantee that we will grow slightly faster than we had expected, in fact, as many of you know, for very long periods, we do not invite other people to join us, and we do not accept new registration requests. We do not have a “crystal ball” to know if we will win all the elections right away, in all the countries of the world, but surely, at the right time, we will not only have the majority of votes of those who go to vote, but the majority of voters with the right to vote will vote for us, and our growth will be impressive. What do we base these optimistic forecasts on? On the fact that more than half of the people in the world are good people, with above-average intelligence, and they are the first people who will be able to understand our system, its enormous potential, and after the first useful results, for the good of all, almost everyone, even the least intelligent, will decide to join us, and to work concretely, to make our project work. We will never be able to become like everyone else, because we are morphologically different, and certainly better. We were created, by whoever joined us, also with the awareness that there could be dangers, and we can assure you, that having foreseen everything, we have already taken all precautions, to avoid any possible problem. All existing systems provide that the majority decides and the minority complies, but we, in DirectDemocracyS, have made the “losers” fundamental to our activities, in fact, almost everything we decide gets incredible majorities, often over 90%, and this, not because we are “dictators”, not because the vote in our system is almost always open (no one should be ashamed or afraid of what they decide, and no one has ever been expelled from DirectDemocracyS for their ideas, indeed they were invited to propose them and implement them in various groups), but because every vote, of every one of our users, must contain a detailed motivation, and in everything we decide, everything must be done to protect the interests and well-being of the entire world population, without any preference.
We will soon make other related articles, which not only explain our rules, our methodologies, and our instructions, but which also let you know the reasons behind our choices.