Libya ZZ rectangle

DirectDemocracyS

Global Direct Democracy

The political, economic, financial and social program

For the State of Libya

Comprehensive analysis of the situation • Objective criticism • Practical and effective solutions

First Edition — 2026

Introduction: Who are we and why Libya?

DirectDemocracyS (DDS) is a global political organization founded on deeply rooted principles: direct democracy, non-transferable collective ownership, shared leadership, and genuine participatory governance. We represent neither right-wing nor left-wing ideology, but rather common sense, reason, truth, and competence in service to the people—every people, in every country of the world.

Libya is a country rich in vast natural resources, rich in its ancient history, and rich in its resilient people. Yet, since 2011, Libyans have been living in a spiral of political chaos, institutional division, plundering of resources, and blatant foreign interference. This document is not merely a theoretical political program—it is a practical, detailed, and immediately implementable roadmap aimed at returning Libya to the Libyans.

Our approach at DDS is clear: we analyze reality honestly, objectively criticize what is wrong, and offer solutions based on logic, research, and successful global experiences, while respecting Libya's cultural, historical, and social specificities. Our fundamental principle is unwavering: the wealth of every country must forever remain the sole property of its people, and the power to make decisions must always rest directly with the citizens.

 

Part One: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Current Libyan Situation

1-1 The political crisis: chronic division and institutional vacuum

Since the fall of Gaddafi's regime in 2011, Libya has been mired in a labyrinth of political divisions from which it has yet to find a genuine solution. The country is governed by two parallel administrations: the Government of National Unity in Tripoli, led by Abdul Hamid Dbeibah, and the Government of National Stability in Benghazi, led by Osama Hammad and appointed by the House of Representatives. This division is not merely a simple political dispute; it is a proxy war fueled by oil and exacerbated by multiple external powers.

On the electoral front, presidential and parliamentary elections were scheduled for April 2026, but the political process remains stalled. The High National Elections Commission announced its readiness in December 2025, but disagreements over the legislative framework and the formation of a unified government to oversee the elections have hindered any real progress. In April 2026, the UN Special Envoy declared that the political process was still at an impasse, warning that “allowing de facto powers to evade their responsibilities will only prolong the crisis.”

Critique of DDS: Periodic elections alone are not enough — true democracy is continuous direct democracy, not an event that takes place every four years under the supervision of the United Nations and pressure from outside powers.

The fundamental problem: all the rival Libyan factions—whether in the west or the east—share a single objective: to seize as much oil revenue as possible and consolidate their positions of power before any political solution is reached. The conflict is neither ideological nor tribal at its core; it is primarily economic and rentier.

Current power map: In the east, the Libyan National Army forces are concentrated under the command of Khalifa Haftar, who seeks to extend his influence to encompass the entire country. In the west, armed militias vie for control of areas in and around Tripoli. In the south, armed groups operate in a security vacuum that facilitates smuggling and organized crime.

1-2 The Economic Crisis: Oil Without Development

Libya possesses the largest proven oil reserves in Africa and ranks ninth globally. In 2025, oil revenues jumped by 30%, and total government revenues reached approximately 53.6% of GDP. However, this immense wealth does not reach the pockets of ordinary citizens. The Libyan economy is almost entirely dependent on hydrocarbons, which represent 65% of GDP and 93% of exports.

In contrast, the private sector employs only 14% of the workforce, and infrastructure is dilapidated after years of conflict and underinvestment. The Central Bank of Libya is struggling with a governance crisis that erupted in mid-2024, leading to a decline in oil production and a widening exchange rate gap. In January 2026, the Central Bank implemented a second devaluation of the dinar by 14.7%, bringing the official exchange rate to 6.37 dinars to the dollar, while the significant gap with the black market rate persisted.

Public spending: Both the eastern and western governments are engaging in reckless and uncontrolled spending. Libya lost $6 billion from its international reserves in 2024 and an additional $5 billion in the first quarter of 2025 alone. A unified national budget was not adopted for thirteen consecutive years until the April 2026 agreement to establish the first such budget—a step in the right direction, but far from sufficient.

DDS critique: A unified budget is a necessary step but not a solution — as long as oil remains a political weapon in the hands of rival factions, and as long as direct popular oversight is absent, wealth will remain the property of those who wield weapons, not those who own the land.

Systemic corruption: According to Transparency International reports and the US State Department’s 2025 Investment Climate Assessment, corruption is deeply entrenched in all levels of Libyan public administration. There are no clear and accountable mechanisms for managing oil revenues, and the legislative and institutional anti-corruption framework suffers from serious gaps. Smuggling of subsidized fuel is a massive drain on the economy: The Sentry investigation revealed a huge expansion in gasoline and diesel smuggling between 2022 and 2024, enriching corrupt elites at the expense of ordinary Libyans who suffer from fuel shortages and soaring prices.

1-3 The security crisis: Militia dominance and the absence of the state

The security situation in Libya can be described as 'managed chaos'. The country is not in a full-blown civil war, but it is not truly at peace either. Armed militias are the de facto rulers of cities and regions, and their interests intersect with those of the political decision-making centers. Frequent oil field closures are used as leverage in political and financial negotiations, causing significant damage to the national economy and the lives of ordinary citizens.

Foreign intervention: Multiple foreign powers perpetuate the Libyan division and obstruct any genuine unification. Each external party supports the faction that serves its strategic interests, whether in energy, security, or regional influence. This intervention deprives Libyans of their sovereignty over their national decisions.

The human rights issue: The United Nations determined that there were 20 deaths in custody between March 2024 and August 2025. Arbitrary detention, torture, and serious human rights violations are documented and recurring phenomena in the absence of the rule of law.

1-4 The social crisis: A people pays the price

The average Libyan citizen is paying the price for all these intertwined crises. The devaluation of the dinar is driving up the costs of food, medicine, spare parts, and basic goods. Public sector salaries, the primary channel through which oil revenues reach citizens, are losing their purchasing power. Corruption is crippling public services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure. Waves of internal displacement and emigration are draining the country of its young talent.

Libya possesses the resources of a Gulf state, yet its citizens live in a fragile state. This stark contrast between squandered wealth and widespread deprivation is the true driver of the social discontent and political nihilism prevalent among Libyan youth.

 

Part Two: DirectDemocracy's Comprehensive Program in Libya

What follows is not a set of campaign promises—it is a detailed action plan, built on clear mechanisms, specific timelines, and real oversight tools. Every solution is based on the core principles of DDS: logic, efficiency, transparency, popular ownership, and ongoing direct democracy.

First axis: Building genuine direct democracy

The basic question: Why has traditional representative democracy failed in Libya?

Conventional representative democracy—electing representatives every four years and then granting them absolute power—has proven a complete failure in Libya. Elections in the Libyan context mean a competition between armed factions and political money for seats that allow control over the country's resources. The result is always the same: new rulers, old corruption, and further marginalization of the citizen.

The DDS model offers a radical alternative: direct, continuous, genuine democracy — in which the citizen participates in actual decision-making on a daily basis, not just on election day.

Practical mechanism: The fractional model of DDS

The DDS model employs a fractal micro-group structure: each citizen is organized into a basic group of 5 people in their neighborhood or town. These groups connect with five other groups to form a unit of 25 people, then units of 125, then 625, and so on up to the national level.

Each group discusses and votes on decisions locally, and recommendations are then passed up the chain to higher levels. No one has absolute power—every decision can be challenged from the grassroots. This model ends the elite's monopoly on decision-making and returns it to its rightful owners: the citizens.

A practical example from Libya: A neighborhood group of five citizens in Benghazi discusses reforming the subsidized fuel system. Their proposals are then submitted to the four neighboring neighborhood groups to form a district unit. This unit votes on a unified proposal, which is then submitted to the municipal council for a vote, and subsequently to the national level. The decision reflects the true will of the citizens, not the will of the militia or the tribal leader.

ddsAI and allddsAI: Artificial Intelligence in the Service of Democracy

Information is the first condition for true democracy. A citizen who receives incomplete or misleading information cannot participate effectively in governance. DDS is launching its artificial intelligence systems, ddsAI and allddsAI, to achieve this vital goal.

The fundamental principle: Libyan resources—oil, gas, land, and groundwater—are the permanent and exclusive property of the Libyan people. No government, militia, or foreign power has the right to dispose of them without direct and continuous popular oversight.

 

Second axis: The political and institutional program

First: Disarming and integrating the militias

A true democracy cannot be built under the shadow of illegal weapons. The DDS national security plan includes:

Second: A popular constitution, not an elitist one.

Libya needs a constitution that is not drafted in closed rooms between competing elites with international mediation, but a constitution written by the Libyan people themselves through DDS mechanisms for direct participation:

Third: Genuine national reconciliation

Reconciliation is not a televised handshake between leaders—it is a profound social process built on truth and justice. DDS proposes:

 

Third axis: The economic program

First: Reforming the oil sector — from a political weapon to a national asset

Libyan oil must cease to be a tool in the hands of rival factions and move to its natural and rightful state: public property whose revenues go directly to the citizens.

New governance for oil:

Libyan Direct Wealth Fund (Successful Model: Norvay of Norway + Alaska of the USA):

A fixed percentage, no less than 30%, of oil revenues is allocated for direct annual cash distributions to every adult Libyan citizen (a model similar to Alaska's Permanent Wealth Fund). To illustrate: with oil revenues of $21.7 billion in 2025, 30% represents approximately $6.5 billion. For 7 million adult citizens, this translates to roughly $930 per person annually—regardless of their region or affiliation.

This direct distribution reduces corruption (money goes directly to the citizen, not through bureaucracy), strengthens the local economy, and turns every citizen into a natural monitor of the performance of the oil sector.

Second: Economic diversification — Libya after oil

Relying on a depleting resource like oil for 95% of revenue is an economic crime against future generations. The DDS program for economic diversification:

Agriculture and food security sector:

Tourism sector:

Renewable energy sector:

Third: Developing the private sector and collective companies

The DDS model presents 'collective companies' as an alternative to traditional private companies and bureaucratic government institutions. A collective company is owned equally by all its employees, managed democratically, and profits are shared equitably.

 

Fourth axis: The financial and monetary program

Reforming the financial system

The Libyan financial crisis is primarily caused by institutional duplication and the uncontrolled parallel spending of two rival governments. DDS suggests:

Fighting corruption: practical mechanisms, not slogans

Corruption in Libya will not be cured by statements — it will be cured by structural transparency frameworks that make corruption difficult and dangerous:

 

Fifth axis: Social program

First: Education — Investing in the Libyan people

Good education is the foundation upon which direct democracy is built. An illiterate or poorly educated citizen cannot effectively participate in popular governance.

Second: Health — a fundamental right for every Libyan

Third: Libyan women — partners, not marginalized

There can be no true democracy without the full participation of women. Libyan women represent half of society and have historically borne the brunt of repeated conflicts.

Fourth: Libyan youth — the fuel of the future

Libya is a young country—more than half its population is under 30. These young people suffer from unemployment, despair, and a lack of prospects. The DDS Youth Program:

 

Sixth axis: The security program and national sovereignty

Ending foreign interference

Libya cannot be sovereign as long as foreign troops and advisors are deployed on its territory to serve their countries' interests. The DDS declares this as a firm and non-negotiable principle:

Building popular security

 

Seventh axis: Environment and Sustainable Development

Libya and its environment are under double pressure: climate change and human neglect. DDS Environmental Programme:

 

Part Three: Implementation Plan and Timelines

Phase One: Establishment (Months 1-6)

Objective: To build the organizational and technical infrastructure for DDS in Libya.

Phase Two: Expansion (Months 7-18)

The goal: To expand the model to include all Libyan regions and begin implementing reforms.

Phase Three: Consolidation (Years 2-5)

The goal: To transform DDS into a governing political and institutional force through elections and direct participation.

 

Part Four: Expected Results and Specific Benefits

In the short term (1-3 years)

In the medium term (3-10 years)

In the long term (10+ years)

 

Part Five: A Critical Comparison — The Status vs. The DDS Model

Below we present an objective comparative table between the current Libyan reality and what the DDS model offers as an alternative:

Field

Current situation

DDS model

Oil Management

Two rival governments share the revenues according to the balance of power.

Independent public fund, direct distribution, blockchain oversight

Democracy

Elections postponed since 2021, elites negotiating behind closed doors

Live daily sharing via DDS groups and the ddsAI platform

corruption

My system permeates every aspect of the state, without any real accountability.

Full digital transparency, public oversight, independent courts

Security

Armed militias, foreign intervention, security vacuum in the south

A unified national army, civilian oversight, community security

natural wealth

A political tool in the hands of the factions and their foreign backers

Permanent popular sovereignty, not to be relinquished to any party

Development

Rent-seeking without strategy, a one-dimensional economy

Systematic diversification: agriculture, tourism, renewable energy, technology

Information

Politicized media, systematic disinformation, a war of narratives between factions

ddsAI platform: Objective, neutral information, available to all

 

Conclusion: Libya deserves better than what it has experienced.

Libya is a country whose noble and resilient people deserve a far better life than they currently endure. Its vast natural resources, strategic location, and rich history make it a prime candidate to be among the most prosperous and stable countries in the region. The problem is not with the Libyan people—the problem lies with the political system that is used to oppress them and plunder their wealth.

DirectDemocracyS doesn't make promises—it offers a system. A system that has been tried, studied, and carefully designed to achieve one goal: returning power to its rightful owners. In Libya, as in every country in the world, the rightful owners of power are the citizens—all Libyans, without exception.

Our message to the Libyan people is clear: your oil is yours, your land is yours, your decision is yours. DDS is the tool—you are the power.

"Libyan wealth belongs to the Libyan people forever. No government, no militia, no foreign power has the right to dispose of it without the permission of its sole legitimate owner: the people." — DirectDemocracyS

DirectDemocracyS © 2026 — www.directdemocracys.org

This document is publicly available — its free distribution and circulation are encouraged.