By Taiwan on Wednesday, 03 June 2026
Category: English

Program for Taiwan

DirectDemocracyS

A truly democratic political system in the world

Taiwan

Comprehensive political, economic, financial and social plan

Current Situation Analysis, Criticism, and Specific Solutions

Core Principles

Taiwan's wealth and decision-making power belong to the Taiwanese people forever and exclusively.

2026

Released globally by Taiwan DDS organization on behalf of DirectDemocracyS

Foreword: A Message to the People of Taiwan

This document, drafted by Romeo Ciminello, representative of DirectDemocracyS (DDS), on behalf of the global DDS community and its members in Taiwan, is presented to all citizens of Taiwan. This is not an external directive, but an invitation: an invitation for the people of Taiwan to reclaim full control over their own destiny through genuine, direct, and sustainable democracy.

DirectDemocracyS is a global political system built on an unshakeable foundation: the wealth and power to determine the future of each nation must belong forever and solely to its people. There are no exceptions. No foreign power, multinational corporation, financial magnate, or elite group has the right to interfere.

Taiwan is an extraordinary place: a pioneer of democracy, a technological powerhouse, and a vibrant civil society. However, like all existing political systems in the world, Taiwan's current representative democracy suffers from fundamental structural flaws, resulting in the near-silence of the people's voices outside of elections, with real decision-making power falling into the hands of a small number of party elites, conglomerates, and external pressure groups. This plan proposes concrete and feasible solutions to fundamentally change this reality.

Part One: A Comprehensive Analysis and Critique of the Current Situation in Taiwan

I. Current Political Situation: The Gap Between the Illusion of Democracy and Reality

1.1 Election Results and Political Landscape

On January 13, 2024, Taiwan held presidential and legislative elections, the results of which profoundly revealed the complex nature of Taiwan's democracy. Democratic Progressive Party candidate William Lai was elected president with 40.05% of the vote, becoming the first president in Taiwan's history to be elected with less than half the votes. This phenomenon clearly shows that over 60% of Taiwanese voters do not directly support the ruling party's core platform.

In the Legislative Yuan (a unicameral parliament with 113 seats), the election results are more complex:

The tripartite balance of power and the weak opposition have created a serious legislative deadlock. Since Lai Ching-te took office in May 2024, the confrontation between the Executive Yuan and the Legislative Yuan has continued to escalate, making it difficult to advance many important reform measures.

1.2 Structural Political Issues

Taiwan's current political system suffers from the following fundamental problems, which cannot be self-corrected within the existing framework:

[DDS Critique] Taiwan's democratic system is a system of "periodic authorization," not "continuous participation." Election day is the people's only democratic moment; the rest of the time, they are merely bystanders. This is not true democracy, but rather an outsourcing of democracy.

1.3 Recent Political Crisis

Since May 2024, the most serious challenge facing the Lai Ching-te administration has been the debate over reform proposals for the Legislative Yuan. The "Blue-White Alliance," composed of the Kuomintang (KMT) and the Taiwan People's Party (TPP), pushed for the expansion of the Legislative Yuan's powers, attempting to grant it the power to summon administrative officials and private citizens for investigations and to impose criminal sanctions on those who refuse to cooperate. This move sparked massive public protests, with tens of thousands of people taking to the streets, demonstrating the high level of activity in Taiwanese civil society, but also exposing the fundamental dilemma of the current system's inability to effectively reconcile public opinion.

II. Current Economic Situation: The Dual Society Behind the Miracle

2.1 Macroeconomic Data

index

Data (2024-2025)

GDP growth rate (2024)

4.84% (revised upwards)

GDP growth rate (Q1 2025)

5.48% (significantly exceeding expectations)

Export growth (Q1 2025)

+20.29%

Manufacturing growth (Q1 2025)

+11.03%

unemployment rate

Approximately 2.9-3.5% (near full employment)

Semiconductor as a percentage of GDP (2024)

Approximately 20.7%

TSMC as a percentage of GDP

Approximately 8.9%

TSMC's market capitalization

More than 40%

Total exports (2025)

Approximately US$640.7 billion (+34.9%)

The surface figures are impressive. However, behind these dazzling numbers lies an increasingly severe social reality: Taiwan is forming a "dual society"—the gap between a small number of tech elites and the majority of ordinary workers is widening.

2.2 Fundamental Problems of Economic Structure

[DDS Critique] Taiwan's "economic miracle" is increasingly becoming a miracle for a minority. When 40% of Taiwanese households admit to "financial anxiety," while the stock market continues to reach new highs, we must face this problem squarely: GDP growth does not equate to an improvement in people's quality of life. Wealth is concentrated in the hands of TSMC shareholders and tech elites, rather than being distributed equitably among all Taiwanese people.

III. Current Financial Situation: Risks of Wealth Concentration and Outflow

3.1 Financial Structure Issues

IV. Current Social Situation: Population Crisis and Social Division

4.1 Population Crisis

Taiwan is facing one of the world's most severe demographic crises. In 2023, Taiwan's total fertility rate dropped to 0.87, far below the 2.1 needed to maintain a stable population, making it one of the lowest in the world. With its aging population, Taiwan is projected to officially enter a super-aged society after 2040, at which point the proportion of elderly people that each working person needs to support will rise sharply, placing enormous pressure on its pension, healthcare, and social welfare systems.

4.2 Social Inequality and Generational Conflicts

4.3 Education and Healthcare

4.4 Environmental Issues

Part Two: The Complete DirectDemocracyS Solution

I. Political Reform: From Representative Democracy to Genuine and Continuous Direct Democracy

1.1 DDS Fractal Microgroup Structure

The core political architecture of DirectDemocracyS is the "Fractal Micro-Group" system, which is the most advanced, transparent, and inclusive model of political participation in human history.

Its basic structure is as follows:

5 people → 25 people → 125 people → 625 people → 3,125 people → ... → All 23,000,000 people in Taiwan are fully represented and mandated by the next level, forming a perfect democratic transmission chain.

  1. Basic Microgroups (5 people): Each basic political unit consists of 5 verified DDS members. Through thorough discussion, information sharing, and consensus-building, this group elects one representative to speak on their behalf at a higher level. Representatives must strictly adhere to the group's mandate and cannot act arbitrarily.
  2. Secondary Group (25 people): Representatives from the 5 basic groups form the secondary group. After thorough discussion, one representative is selected to advance to the next level.
  3. Three-tier group (125 people): and so on, each level is a precise microcosm of the level before it, ensuring that everyone's voice can be transmitted through the democratic chain and ultimately influence the decision-making at the highest level.
  4. National level: Across Taiwan, the highest level of representatives constitutes the DDS Taiwan National Committee, but all decisions of this committee are subject to immediate oversight and authorization from groups at all levels.

The revolutionary aspect of this system lies in the fact that decision-making power always flows downwards, rather than being centralized upwards. Any representative can be recalled at any time by their authorized group and replaced by another member. No one can monopolize political power for long.

1.2 Instant Electronic Direct Democracy

DDS, through the ddsAI platform and allddsAI technology, provides every Taiwanese citizen with a secure, verifiable, and real-time tool for democratic participation:

[Specific Example] Suppose the Taiwanese government plans to build a new science park in Changhua County. Under the existing system, decisions are made by a small number of people in the Executive Yuan and Legislative Yuan, leaving Changhua County residents with almost no voice. Under the DDS system, every five residents of Changhua County form a microgroup to fully discuss and express their opinions. Through this process, decisions are ultimately formed based on genuine public opinion, ensuring that the entire process is open, verifiable, and tamper-proof.

1.3 Three-Code Identity Verification System

DDS's political participation is built upon a secure and trusted authentication system, while maximizing the protection of individual privacy:

This system guarantees authenticity, uniqueness, and verifiability—while remaining completely anonymous. Any act of election fraud cannot be verified by the system.

1.4 Expert Committee System

True democracy is not just about vote counting, but also about informed participation. DDS establishes committees composed of genuine experts in every policy area:

All committees are service-oriented, not decision-making bodies. Decision-making always belongs to the people; expert committees merely ensure that the people have complete, accurate, and neutral information when making decisions.

1.5 Anti-manipulation protection mechanism

Taiwan's information environment has long been affected by media manipulation, disinformation, and cognitive warfare from various sources. DDS's platform employs the following mechanisms to provide protection:

II. Economic Reform: Comprehensive Rebalancing

2.1 Breaking the single dependence on semiconductors

One of Taiwan's core challenges is transforming its economic model, which relies solely on a few tech giants, into a diversified and balanced economy that benefits all Taiwanese. DDS proposes the following specific pathways:

  1. Establish a "National Strategic Diversification Fund": allocate 5% to 8% of Taiwan's export surplus (approximately US$320 to US$500 billion) annually to support research and development, education, and infrastructure in non-semiconductor industries, with the goal of increasing the contribution of non-technology industries to GDP from less than 50% to 65% within 10 years.
  2. Agricultural Technology Upgrade Plan: Taiwan's agriculture possesses rich traditional knowledge, but has long been sacrificed on the altar of industrialization. The DDS plan promotes a "precision agriculture revolution," combining the ddsAI system with local agricultural wisdom to build Taiwan into an Asian export center for organic and high-end agricultural products, while ensuring that food self-sufficiency increases from the current approximately 35% to over 60%.
  3. Cultural Creativity and the Knowledge Economy: Taiwan boasts rich cultural diversity (Hokkien, Hakka, Indigenous, and Mainland Chinese cultures) and a highly skilled creative workforce. The DDS project invests significant resources to develop Taiwan into a major center for Asian cultural and creative exports, rather than merely a chip manufacturing base.
  4. Green manufacturing transformation: Provide tax incentives and technical support to encourage Taiwan's manufacturing industry to transform towards high value-added and low-carbon emissions, producing sustainable industrial equipment, environmentally friendly materials and clean energy technologies.

2.2 Semiconductor Sovereignty Protection

TSMC is one of Taiwan's most important national assets, but its current management poses a fundamental sovereignty risk. DDS proposes the following protective measures:

[Specific Examples and Expected Effects] Assuming the establishment of a semiconductor universal income dividend mechanism: If 10% of TSMC's excess profits are extracted annually (estimated at approximately US$12 billion based on 2024 profits, or about US$1.2 billion), and distributed to the 23 million residents of Taiwan, each person would receive approximately US$52 (about NT$1,600) annually. Combined with other social policies, this could serve as the starting point for a DDS universal minimum income plan.

2.3 Small and Medium Enterprise Revitalization Plan

2.4 The Salary Justice Revolution

  1. Progressive minimum wage system: Abolish the concept of a uniform national minimum wage, and instead establish differentiated minimum wage standards based on local cost of living, industry profit levels, and enterprise size to ensure that every worker's salary can truly cover the basic cost of living in their locality.
  2. Mandatory profit-sharing mechanism: Legislation requires all companies with more than 50 employees to transparently distribute at least 5% to 10% of their annual pre-tax profits to all employees (not just executives), directly linking salary increases to company growth.
  3. Systematic elimination of overtime work: Taiwan's infamous reputation as an "island of working hours" must not continue. By gradually shortening legal working hours through legislation and establishing a strict overtime pay calculation mechanism, the practice of companies substituting low wages for reasonable salaries by adding overtime hours can be fundamentally eliminated.
  4. Implementation of equal pay for equal work: Formulate legally binding laws on equal pay for equal work and establish a transparent salary disclosure mechanism, requiring companies to disclose the salary range for each position, thereby eliminating the breeding ground for salary discrimination.

III. Financial Reform: Democratization of Wealth and Protection of Sovereignty

3.1 Establish a Taiwan sovereign wealth fund

Taiwan possesses one of the world's largest foreign exchange reserves (over US$560 billion), but its management lacks transparency and citizen participation. DDS Project:

3.2 De-speculation in housing finance

Taiwan's housing problem is essentially a financial policy issue, not a construction volume issue.

  1. Progressive Vacancy Tax: A high progressive tax is levied on those who own three or more residential properties that remain vacant for extended periods (2% of the current value of the property each year starting with the third property; increasing to 5% from the fifth property onwards), fundamentally eliminating the financial incentive to hoard homes.
  2. Large-scale expansion of social housing: The goal is to increase the stock of social housing from less than 3% to 15% within 10 years, with direct government investment and construction, without relying on private developers, to ensure the housing rights of vulnerable groups, young people and newlyweds.
  3. Foreigners are prohibited from purchasing farmland and residential properties in Taiwan: This is to protect Taiwan's land resources from being acquired by foreign capital and to ensure that the land belongs to the people of Taiwan.
  4. Mortgage interest rate control: Provide low-interest mortgages with government guarantees for first-time homebuyers, with the maximum loan amount linked to the loan interest rate, to prevent excessive credit expansion from driving up housing prices.

3.3 Financial Democratization

IV. Social Reform: Holistic Human Development

4.1 DDS (Guaranteed Minimum Income)

DirectDemocracyS's global program includes a core social policy—Guaranteed Universal Minimum Income - Structured Volunteering (GUMI-SV). This system will be implemented in Taiwan in the following form:

[Expected Outcomes] The implementation of GUMI-SV will fundamentally eliminate absolute poverty in Taiwan, while liberating citizens to pursue creativity, care for their families, and engage in community service without being forced to accept any harsh working conditions for basic survival. It will also significantly boost consumer demand in Taiwan, stimulate the healthy development of the domestic market, and reduce excessive reliance on exports.

4.2 Housing rights protection

4.3 A Revolutionary Restructuring of Population Policy

Taiwan's low birth rate stems from structural, not cultural, causes. DDS's proposed solution is not to subsidize childbirth, but to eliminate the structural barriers to childlessness:

  1. Fully paid parental leave: Both parents are entitled to 18 months of paid parental leave (80% of their salary), and the law explicitly prohibits discrimination against employees for this purpose. Losses incurred by the company during this period will be compensated by the national treasury.
  2. To promote quality public childcare: Within five years, sufficient public kindergartens will be established in all counties and cities in Taiwan, with the goal of ensuring that the cost of public childcare for children aged 0 to 6 does not exceed 5% of the family's monthly income.
  3. Support for only children and extended families: Provide substantial tax credits and priority eligibility for social services, but fully respect individual reproductive choices and do not impose any penalties or moral pressure on "not having children".
  4. Modernize immigration policies: Attract global talent to settle in Taiwan with a more open and fair approach, and provide reasonable permanent residency and citizenship pathways for foreign migrant workers who work in Taiwan long-term, thereby enriching Taiwan's population structure.

4.4 Restoration of Indigenous Sovereignty

4.5 Healthcare Reform

4.6 Fundamental Transformation of the Education System

  1. Abolish the culture of "exams determine one's future": Gradually abolish the system that determines a student's fate based on a single exam result, establish a diversified assessment system, and emphasize critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, and practical skills.
  2. Critical Civic Education: Introducing the democratic education curriculum advocated by DDS into all grades to cultivate Taiwanese citizens' ability to understand the political system, evaluate information, identify manipulation, and actively participate in community affairs from elementary school onwards.
  3. Upgrading of technical and vocational education: Make comprehensive investments in technical and vocational education, eliminate the social prejudice of "second-class technical and vocational education", and enable technical and vocational education to enjoy the same social prestige and salary level as university education.
  4. Teachers' dignity and salaries: Significantly increase the salaries of teachers at all levels in Taiwan (aiming to put teachers' salaries in the top 25% of the salary distribution of workers in their age group), while giving teachers greater autonomy in teaching and reducing administrative burdens.

V. Environment and Energy: Sustainable Taiwan

5.1 Energy Independence Plan

Taiwan's energy problem is one of the decisive challenges for the next 10 years. DDS has proposed the "Taiwan Energy Sovereignty Plan":

  1. Large-scale offshore wind power construction: The Taiwan Strait is one of the world's richest sea areas in terms of wind energy. The plan is to complete at least 30GW of offshore wind power installations by 2035, investing 1% of GDP (approximately US$9 billion) annually for this purpose, and requiring major development contracts to include at least 60% domestic manufacturing to drive the development of related industrial chains.
  2. Rooftop solar power to be universally available: Mandatory installation of solar panels during renovations of all residential and commercial buildings, with full subsidies for low-income households, aiming to enable 80% of buildings to generate some of their own electricity by 2032.
  3. Investment in energy storage technologies: Large-scale investment in grid-scale energy storage technologies (pumped hydro storage, lithium batteries, hydrogen storage) to solve the problem of intermittent renewable energy and ensure stable power supply.
  4. Democratic decision-making on nuclear energy: Taiwan's nuclear energy policy should not be decided unilaterally by any political party. The DDS demands a fully informed national referendum on this issue, allowing the people of Taiwan to decide the future role of nuclear power themselves.

5.2 Carbon Neutralization Pathway

5.3 Agricultural and Food Sovereignty

Part Three: DDS Implementation Path in Taiwan

I. Phased Implementation Plan

Phase 1 (1 to 3 years): Establishing the Foundation

  1. Establish the DDS Taiwan Digital Platform: Utilize Taiwan's most advanced information security technology to build a complete DDS platform, including an authentication system, microgroup management tools, real-time voting mechanisms, and an information dissemination system.
  2. Seed Microgroup Formation: The first batch of 5,000 basic microgroups (25,000 people) were recruited from all over Taiwan to ensure diversity in geography, ethnicity, age and occupation, forming the first layer of the DDS Taiwan network.
  3. Establishment of ddsAI Taiwan Node: Construct a fully self-operated ddsAI infrastructure within Taiwan to ensure the sovereignty and independence of Taiwan's data and to avoid reliance on foreign cloud services.
  4. Pilot policy proposals: Select 2 to 3 of Taiwan's most pressing issues (such as housing, wages, or energy policies) and conduct public discussions and policy proposals through the DDS platform to demonstrate the actual operation of direct democracy.
  5. Civic Education Movement: Massive promotion of civic education based on the DDS principles, using community discussions, school curricula, and online content to help Taiwanese citizens understand the possibility of true democracy.

Phase Two (3 to 8 years): Expansion and Deepening

  1. Expanding coverage to 1 million members: Through word of mouth and systematic promotion, the DDS Taiwan network will be expanded to 1 million members, forming a civil society force capable of exerting a substantial influence on the existing political system.
  2. Implementation at the local government level: Establish "democratic co-governance" pilot projects in county and municipal governments that are willing to cooperate with DDS, allowing DDS microgroups to directly participate in the local government's policy-making process and accumulate practical governance experience.
  3. The semiconductor public dividend is launched: legislation is completed, and public dividends are extracted from excess technology profits and distributed transparently through the DDS platform to build public trust in the system.
  4. GUMI-SV Pilot Program: To pilot the universal minimum income guarantee program in one or two counties and cities, collect data, adjust parameters, and prepare for nationwide rollout.

Phase Three (8 to 15 years): Comprehensive Transformation

  1. DDS has become a major political force in Taiwan: Through the gradual accumulation of public trust and practical policy achievements, DDS has become an important voice that cannot be ignored in Taiwan's political landscape, and has promoted fundamental reforms of the existing representative system, incorporating more direct democratic mechanisms.
  2. The GUMI-SV program is being fully implemented across Taiwan: a universal minimum income guarantee is being implemented throughout Taiwan to completely eliminate absolute poverty and ensure that every Taiwanese citizen has basic material security and dignity.
  3. Taiwan achieves energy independence: the proportion of renewable energy reaches over 70%, Taiwan no longer relies on fossil fuel imports, and its energy sovereignty is guaranteed.
  4. Export of the democratic model: Taiwan has become a model of true democracy in Asia, sharing the successful experience of the DDS model with other Asia-Pacific countries.

II. AllddsAI's role in Taiwan

allddsAI is DDS's artificial intelligence democracy system, which will play a key role in its implementation in Taiwan.

Key principle: allddsAI will always only provide suggestions and information support; it will never make final decisions. All decision-making power always belongs to the citizens of Taiwan. Artificial intelligence serves the people, not replaces their thinking.

III. DDS Positioning in the Geopolitical Context of Taiwan

Taiwan faces a unique geopolitical situation: navigating between the People's Republic of China's persistent territorial claims and the strategic support of the United States for its survival and development. The DDS has a clear position on this:

Part Four: Expected Outcomes and Specific Benefits

I. Short-term benefits (1 to 5 years)

field

Expected Results

Political transparency

All major policy decisions are made public on the DDS platform, and citizens can access them instantly.

Salary Justice

The minimum wage across Taiwan has increased by 20% to 35% in real terms, and overtime work has decreased significantly.

Housing burden

Social housing supply increased by 50%, vacant house tax curbs hoarding.

Semiconductor industry benefits for all

Each Taiwanese citizen receives an annual distribution of technology dividends.

civic education

The school's democratic education curriculum has been fully established.

Medical and nursing benefits

Salary increases for healthcare workers reverse the trend of brain drain.

II. Medium-term benefits (5 to 15 years)

field

Expected Results

Industrial diversification

The contribution of non-technology industries to GDP increased from 50% to 65%.

Energy independence

Renewable energy accounts for 60-70%, achieving electricity self-sufficiency.

Food security

The food self-sufficiency rate increased from 35% to 60%.

Population Trends

Birth rate stops declining, immigration policies attract high-quality talent

Inequality

The Gini coefficient has improved significantly, and the middle class has become more stable and larger.

GUMI-SV

Universal minimum income guarantee has been fully implemented, and absolute poverty has been eliminated.

III. Long-term benefits (15 to 30 years)

"Taiwan's greatness lies not in its chips, but in its people. Ensuring that every Taiwanese citizen truly owns the future of their nation is a strength that no external threat can take away." — DirectDemocracyS Taiwan Project Spirit

Conclusion: An invitation to the people of Taiwan

Taiwan stands at a historic crossroads.

On the one hand, Taiwan boasts remarkable achievements: a vibrant democratic tradition, world-leading technological capabilities, a highly educated civil society, and a profound cultural heritage. On the other hand, Taiwan also faces increasingly severe practical challenges: the rigidity and corruption of its representative political system, extreme inequality in the distribution of economic dividends, the deprivation of hope among the younger generation, and escalating geopolitical pressure from major external powers.

DirectDemocracyS is not here to tell the people of Taiwan what to do. We are here to invite the people of Taiwan—with your own hands, through your own collective wisdom—to reclaim what is rightfully yours: true sovereignty, true democracy, and a true future.

We believe that when every citizen of Taiwan can become a true decision-maker, rather than just a bystander who votes once every four years; when Taiwan's wealth truly benefits every Taiwanese person, rather than just flowing into the accounts of a few shareholders; when Taiwan's policies are no longer swayed by financial conglomerates and external powers, but truly reflect the common will of all the Taiwanese people—then Taiwan will be stronger than any military alliance, safer than any diplomatic promise, and more worthy of pride than any GDP figure.

This is DirectDemocracyS's Taiwan plan. This is an invitation to join us.

Taiwan belongs to the Taiwanese people.

It will always be so.

www.directdemocracys.org

public.directdemocracys.org

Leave Comments