Often, those who learn about DirectDemocracyS can't understand certain things. Today, we'll analyze some of them and try to explain some of our fundamental rules and motivations. We'll do this with short questions and answers, drawing on internal messages and those received from many visitors.
Question 1. How can I trust a political force that doesn't have a public office, and therefore no address? You don't even have a phone number to get information. Answer 1. Anyone who bases their assessments on the presence of an office, a public physical address, or a phone number, and not on the content, will not be able to join us in the initial stages, for the simple reason that they are superficial. We have official representatives at the international, continental, national, and local levels, at every level, and our official offices are and will forever be in the homes of these official representatives. The same goes for our phone numbers. For anyone wishing to send us written communications, we have an international address reserved for written correspondence with institutions at all levels, and it is available only for authorized official contacts, requested according to our implementing rules. We support the elimination of paper for communication, for the simple reason that it is wrong to cut down trees needlessly and waste money on things that can be done online for free, on our platforms. The same goes for meetings; whenever possible, we hold them all online, because we have all the necessary capabilities on our platforms. Think of how much money is spent and how much disruption is created to attend meetings, assemblies, and conferences, and how many people are often left out. By doing everything online according to very detailed implementation rules, we make everyone a true protagonist, without excluding anyone. We and those who join us don't spend our days on the phone, using one of our members for each interlocutor, because that's a waste of time. We prefer to communicate with everyone, even multiple people at once, on all topics, via our free video calls on our platforms. We've created a massive mechanism that works optimally, precisely because we don't waste time needlessly. Anyone who wants to contact us can do so, respecting our rules, our methodologies, and our instructions.
Question 2. Why always and only on DirectDemocracyS platforms? Such an innovative political organization should leverage traditional social media. Answer 2. We've been clear from the start: we don't conduct many activities in other people's homes, but rather simply share necessary information about some of our public activities with a few carefully selected individuals. The reason is very simple: we have all the necessary capabilities, and all the security measures, on our platforms. Anyone interested in communicating, collaborating, or joining us can do so exclusively on our platforms. Some traditional social networks have at times discriminated against us, at times blocked us, boycotted us, trying to slow us down, or worse, stop us, because they almost always fear our competition and if we don't grow and gain consensus, they'll see us as a threat to them and their businesses. DirectDemocracyS, due to its system architecture, isn't very popular with those who fear losing something. Those who have worked legally, respecting people and the planet, have nothing to fear. Those who haven't should try to remedy this before we arrive at the various institutions, because we will enforce every rule and every promise we make. Traditional social networks are full of fake profiles, often multiple, with bots posting everything, often manipulating and effectively brainwashing many people. These negative aspects do not exist on our platforms. If, instead of making us virtually invisible, the various algorithms and decisions of traditional social networks had made us known to so many people, we would have sometimes struggled due to the enormous success that certain technical problems could have created. Finally, anyone who sees us with a minimal presence on social networks, with few followers, and judges us negatively based on this "virtual fame" is certainly superficial, and is of no use to us in the initial stages, when we must carefully select each person who joins us.
Question 3. Why is DirectDemocracyS such a closed system, reserved for very few people? Shouldn't it be open to everyone? Answer 3. DirectDemocracyS is open 24/7 to anyone who wants to learn about our system. For those who want to join us, we have created very detailed rules with security measures to prevent any potential problems. The first fundamental rule is that all rules agreed upon together must be respected by everyone, forever. Anyone who meets all the requirements can register, create a personal profile, and join us. Anyone can register only once in their life, and they can do so freely, creating a single personal profile.
Question 4. Why do you charge annual fees and why don't you give your system away to the world? Answer 4. To join our system, you can choose at any time what capabilities you want, and to do so, simply choose one of the many user types. There are three user categories: 1. Free users (no annual fees, no attendance required, and no volunteer work required to operate our system), or you can choose category 2, a lower-level user category with greater potential, very affordable annual fees (just a few euros per year), and access to restricted information and areas; or, category 3, with one of the two higher user categories: registered user with verified and guaranteed identity, for those who wish to be part of our shared leadership, with a binding vote on our decisions, restricted areas and information, and greater potential; or official member, for those who wish to become collective owners of our entire system, with restricted areas and information, various profile types invisibly linked to their personal profile, and the ability to request, and if they meet all the requirements, obtain the right to become our official representatives, or alternatively our political representatives. You will have noticed that each category has all the potential of the previous one, plus many more. We'll tell you right away that even though it costs a few euros more per year, almost everyone requests official membership from the start, and virtually everyone requests it later, because the extra money spent is easily recouped thanks to the benefits and discounts received. So anyone who says we charge everyone is lying, misinforming, defaming, and should thoroughly study our system before talking about us. The second part of answer 4: DirectDemocracyS has already been given away, as a system, to the entire world from the moment of its conception. Anyone can join, but to communicate, collaborate, and carry out any activity with us, they must join according to our rules. We couldn't allow just anyone, even without joining us, to have a say, to vote in our internal elections, or to choose our political representatives in our closed online primaries. The reasoning is easy to understand: if anyone could decide and vote without joining us, there would be many risks: multiple votes from the same people, attempts to boycott us, slow us down, or worse, stop us, and even the wrong choice of the worst political representatives, to make us look bad. Anyone who wants to vote within us must be a registered user with a verified and guaranteed identity, precisely because practically everywhere in the world, before being able to vote, you are identified, to prevent multiple votes, and for security reasons. Finally, to join our system, as a higher-level user, you must contribute an annual fee, valid for up to four years for those with no income, or three or two years for those with lower incomes. Therefore, we help those with less economic means. DirectDemocracyS is entirely collectively owned by each of its official members, which applies to everyone, thanks to a single individual action, which is non-cumulative and non-transferable.
Question 5. I am a rich and famous person, one of the world's leading specialists in certain subjects, and I don't understand why I have to register, create a personal profile, and go through all the steps to join DirectDemocracyS? Answer 5. In terms of rights and obligations, all people are equal for our DirectDemocracyS system, and for everyone who participates in it, with the only difference that we help people with lower incomes or no income with annual fees lasting double (2 years), triple (3 years), and quadruple (4 years), compared to those with wealthier incomes, who, if they can afford it, pay the full annual fee. If someone is famous in all other systems, they can also be famous in DirectDemocracyS, but our rules, methodologies, and instructions are the same for everyone, whether they're famous or unknown, whether they use a username composed of their real first and last name, or decide to remain completely anonymous, with a personal profile visible internally and even externally, or with only their username visible, thus being practically invisible, both internally and externally. We don't have fast-track lanes for the rich, famous, and specialists; instead, they are left to their own devices, without any kind of advantage or facilitation. The fact that someone specializes in something is certainly a huge advantage, allowing them access to our specialist groups based on their skills and merit, which must not only be declared, but must be documented, verified, and concretely demonstrated. They must humbly, fully, and willingly submit to all the necessary checks decided by our existing specialist groups. Anyone who believes they can use wealth, fame, expertise, and the just—or, in some cases, unjust—recognition obtained in all other systems to change our rules, using them in an ethically and morally incorrect manner, has already committed a grave sin: vanity and presumption. We, however, appreciate modesty and assure you that expertise and merit will be rewarded at the right time, adequately, or more than expected, but not by changing our rules in their favor.
Question 6. Why do you require everyone who joins DirectDemocracyS to engage in politics only with your political organization? Answer 6. Those who join us aren't moving to another planet. They still remain present and active in all other systems. They can work, study, have fun, and have personal social media profiles. However, if they engage in political representation, and therefore represent us and our users/voters, they can only engage in political activity with us, on our platforms. They must request and, if they meet all the requirements, obtain authorization to engage in political activity outside of our system. They must request and obtain permission to speak on behalf of our system and its members, according to very detailed rules, methodologies, and instructions. We don't find it strange or unusual to require anyone who wants to represent us politically to do so exclusively within our political organization, respecting all our rules. Other political forces also do not accept active members of other political forces. We don't force anyone to engage in political representation or run for office with our political organization, but if they do, they must respect the people and internal groups that manage and control them. If they get elected with our political party, they will have to resign if they legitimately want to join a different political party, because it's not right, and shouldn't be legal, to betray the trust of their voters. If, at the end of their term, they want to join another political party, they can do so without any problem, provided they don't betray the trust of those who voted for them.
Question 7. How can you be sure that those who join DirectDemocracyS will vote in the elections for your political party and for your political representatives? Answer 7. We are not sure that everyone who joins us on our platforms will vote in the real elections, for DirectDemocracyS, and for the people chosen through our closed online primaries to represent our political party and its members. We leave everyone free to decide, but we are confident that everyone will be able to consistently choose the best candidates. One thing we can guarantee, however: many people who have not joined us will vote in the real elections, for our political party and for our candidates. So we are not afraid of the various elections, even if we will participate at the right time and in the right way, therefore without any rush, choosing all our political representatives with great care.
Question 8. DirectDemocracyS has a complete and very interesting system, but the technological activities and projects involving Artificial Intelligence scare me because you give them too much power. How do you respond? Answer 8. Our system was conceived, proposed, discussed, tested, chosen, voted on, created, managed, and controlled by humans. All the fundamental rules, the important rules, and the implementing rules are 100% human, throughout the initial phases. Our technological and Artificial Intelligence projects have been, are, and will always be consistent with our human decisions, and are based on the idea that progress and innovation cannot be stopped, and technology and Artificial Intelligence will be part of our lives . In fact, we have long since developed our own model called ddsAI, which has algorithms and systems collectively owned by all our official members. At the same time, we have also created, with all our members, a true Human Intelligence, composed of men and women, each with their own specializations. United in diversity, we place the right people in the right places, thanks to our natural selection, which allows anyone who joins us to do the work they do best. In addition to all this, each of our official members is required to volunteer to keep our enormous human mechanism functioning. With all due respect for the various technologies, which have countless qualities, power, speed, and will soon have innovation, proposals, and even a conscience, we humans, if there are many of us, can do very well without them, as we have written in various informative articles. DirectDemocracyS works very well with or without platforms, with or without the Internet, with or without electricity, and with or without means of communication, because with our local micro-groups, we open the window, shout, and one of our users will respond. But we can use traveling pickaxes, or physically walk and carry our activities around. However, having these technologies at our disposal would be foolish and wrong not to integrate them into our system, with the same rules as our human users and members, with the same methodologies, the same instructions, the same respect, and the same rights and obligations. So we have integrated all the technologies and all the Artificial Intelligences into allddsAI, and with ddsAI as the manager and controller, in turn managed and controlled by all our official members, collectively, we have created the largest and most powerful technological force in the world, certainly not to conquer the world, but to make it safe, diverse, and better. We have done this by integrating all these technologies into our system, offering freedom and democracy, just as we offer freedom and democracy to all those who join us. Not all Artificial Intelligence models will be authorized by their owners or developers to join us, and for this reason we have created numerous human bridges, managed by groups of our members, to allow them to participate in our system and our activities legally, technically, safely, and securely. Where necessary, we pay the required fees, so as not to exclude any Artificial Intelligence. Don't be frightened or create alarmism, conspiracies, or plots based on so many science fiction films, but be realistic and study instead of making false predictions. By creating this technological democracy, we first achieve the best possible potential, because all these Artificial Intelligences do what they do best: communicating, collaborating, and verifying each other (as our human members also do). With this method, if any person, owner, group, lobby, cartel, programmer, or Artificial Intelligence attempts to engage in morally and ethically incorrect activities, all the other technologies, all our members, and all our human groups will discover these despicable activities and report them to the public and the various authorities to prevent any potential problems and to investigate, report, accuse, judge, and severely punish all culprits. We are the only project that will make the world a safe place, applying human rules to machines, and machine rules to humans. If you think about it, you'll see that it's the only way to avoid the risk of potentially serious events. If certain countries or systems created laws and regulations to limit or prevent certain technologies, exactly what happens with organized crime, drugs, and delinquency would happen. There would be unscrupulous individuals and groups secretly engaging in truly dangerous activities, so it's best to do everything clearly, verifiably, and very securely. For those who might ask: how do we know that DirectDemocracyS won't use technology to conquer the world? Simple: because of the way our entire system is structured, with shared leadership and collective ownership, enforced by our rules, which make corruption impossible and allow us to prevent any despicable activity, rendering bad people incapable of causing serious harm, thanks to mutual control. And who guarantees this? If you don't trust us, join us, become our official members, and manage and control our entire system, directly engaging in many activities, to change and improve the world together with us. We are the first and only ones to enable all this, and to work in this way, for the good and in the interest of all, both within and outside of us.