One of the greatest flaws of us human beings is that we are almost all easily corruptible.

From this simple and undeniable phrase, we created DirectDemocracyS, seeking solutions to this scourge that makes our lives worse.

Almost all of them come at a price, and all systems, except ours, don't do a good job of preventing these despicable behaviors.

It would be easy to trivialize by saying: politics is all corrupt. Generalizing is always wrong, and we try and succeed in never doing so. In many of our sentences, we add the words: some (some are corrupt), often (often there are corrupt people), in certain cases (in certain cases there are corrupt people), or almost all (almost everyone is corrupt). This way of communicating allows us to avoid offending the few incorruptible people, while still analyzing society in a fair and equitable manner.

We find it profoundly wrong to distinguish between petty corruption and grand corruption, because both are wrong. It's like saying: in that war, only a few people died. A few people killed, injured, or frightened are always too many. To better understand what we're trying to explain, let's give you a practical example: tax evasion. If a person or a company evades €1,000, it's a significant sum, which should be recovered and used for the common good. But 10,000 people evading €1 each create greater harm to the community. To justify their own misconduct, people often tend to minimize it, even with phrases like: "He who steals an apple ends up in prison; he who steals a truckload of apples never pays." Someone who steals a truckload of apples has a greater chance of bribing (giving away stolen apples), but by selling the apples or giving them away, they afford better lawyers to defend them.

We don't want to address issues of justice in this article; we've written many on this important aspect of society.

The key point is that a lot of micro-corruption often causes more damage than a little macro-corruption, and therefore it must be prevented, discovered, and punished in exactly the same way.

But the fundamental question is just one: can an incorruptible system exist? The simple answer is: no, a system free of corruption cannot exist immediately. But again, the correct answer is different: there are various types of systems, and there are some that, at various stages, can guarantee, thanks to controls and preventive measures, fewer instances of corruption.

DirectDemocracyS was conceived as a system that, over time, and with intelligent and courageous choices, will be the least corrupt in human history.

Once again, there will be people outside our system who will tell us that we're making claims unsupported by any concrete examples. It would be enough to continue studying our system, and we'd have all the necessary proof.

However, we'll give you a few examples to help you understand our method of monitoring the integrity of our system. Surely, many will tell us: it's excessive, you're obsessed with security measures. Others will say: you don't respect your users, let alone those who will never be part of it.

Security measures must always be preventative and discourage any behavior that might be ethically and morally incorrect. An insecure system is doomed to failure.

All our controls respect all honest, sincere, loyal, and trustworthy people. Those who respect all laws have nothing to fear. Those who have nothing to hide should not resist all necessary controls, at any time. Those who want to be cunning and engage in unethical activities can do so, hoping never to be discovered, within traditional systems or outside of DirectDemocracyS.

Specifically, in our system, we have increasing security measures, based on the various types of users and the roles of each person.

Free user types are less controlled, because they don't have much potential and can't cause any problems.

Even lower-level users, having no voting rights (because their identities are not verified and guaranteed), cannot create corruption cases.

For the types of registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities, which together make up our truly and completely shared leadership, the controls are greater.

For our official members, who collectively own our entire system, the security measures are even greater.

We have comprehensive security measures and controls in place for our official representatives, who are official members representing our system internally or externally, and for our political representatives, who, after our closed online primaries, will participate in real elections. As public figures, they will have to continually demonstrate to us that they are incorruptible.

For even higher-level users, with access to restricted areas, and more important and responsible groups, we are very intrusive, precise, and inflexible, but we cannot risk being boycotted, slowed down, or worse, stopped.

Concretely, what do all these preventive checks consist of?

First, identity. Knowing who carries out each activity is essential, both to reward the best and to identify and punish the worst. Second, verifying each activity, through our special security groups, in collaboration with all other special groups, specialist groups, and other groups connected to these reporting, evaluation, and control activities. The third aspect, the most important, and the most controversial, consists of attempting various methods to verify the incorruptibility of each individual, but also of each group. Finally, verifying who is controlling, while also verifying who is controlling, who is controlling, who is controlling. A series of cross-checks, which at first glance may seem complex and exaggerated, but are essential to being credible, consistent, and therefore unassailable.

But why doesn't the DirectDemocracyS system leave it up to the authorities and institutions to monitor individuals and groups? Because we do it internally and externally, continuously, comprehensively, and efficiently. And if the authorities responsible for these controls do the same, where it falls within their jurisdiction, we will be happy to help them, respectfully, concretely, and safely.

But why don't you allow complete external control of DirectDemocracyS? Because we can't trust anyone who isn't an official member. We have nothing to hide, but we can't grant outside access to sensitive data or areas where malicious people might try to cause problems. Nothing prevents anyone from joining us, and based on our rules, methodologies, and instructions, they can control virtually all of our activities. Here are some reasons. First, our defense of the right to invisibility, which consists of allowing anyone to decide whether to make their personal data and activities with our system visible or invisible, both externally and within our system. Second, the right to anonymity, which allows anyone to use a nickname or a random code as a username to identify themselves and carry out activities with us. Finally, our promise to keep private and not disclose anyone's personal data and activities.

If there are any suspicions of any crimes, by any person or group, in our system, simply file a report (by authorities, institutions, or even ordinary citizens), and we will carry out all necessary checks.

If you have evidence of any crimes, just let us know, and after all our checks, we will report each individual or group ourselves.

At this point, there will be people who will say: "And who can guarantee that you won't hide any crimes?" The best guarantee is to join us, becoming our official members, and as collective owners of our entire system, you can participate in various oversight groups. Seeing firsthand how attentive we are to all our activities, you realize that, while we protect everyone, we don't hide, because we don't engage in illegal activities.

But is it right to test anyone's trustworthiness by attempting to bribe them? Undoubtedly, the only way to verify whether someone is incorruptible is to attempt to bribe them, as often as necessary. Let's take a concrete example, regarding political representatives. If you entrust them with public funds or positions of power, you must continuously verify each person's trustworthiness to prevent any potential problems.

What if a DirectDemocracyS political representative were discovered to be corrupt? Like all other political forces, it would rightly cause serious damage to their reputation, resulting in a loss of support and votes in the next election. But the difference between us and all the others is that our political representatives are continuously monitored by their constituents, according to our detailed rules. Before, during, and, for the first time in the world, even after elections. Thanks to early, irrevocable resignations for personal reasons, we immediately dismiss them if they are corrupt or if they fail to comply with the decisions of their constituents, informed by our expert groups. Therefore, we are the first to verify, uncover, and punish anyone who makes mistakes. We believe it is right to give them one or more chances to correct their mistakes, but in the right ways and at the right time, and always with extensive proof of loyalty and reliability.

Of all possible systems, the capitalist one is better than the statist one, because despite its many imperfections and injustices, it can be changed and improved by continuously implementing equality and meritocracy over time, always together. Statism is a rotten system, riddled with problems, including corruption and backwardness, and is certainly doomed to failure.

Of all political systems, the relatively free and partially democratic Western political forces are always preferable to various dictatorships. Whether they are oligarchic dictatorships like in Russia, where all the country's wealth is given away to incompetent individuals who control and manage the most important companies, or one-party, one-way dictatorships like in China, where fake communism creates regime billionaires who are extremely wealthy, and the population, deprived of any rights, lives in poverty. We will never be in favor of political forces that tolerate no opposition and often even physically eliminate their opponents.

Some examples that explain our motivations.

Would anyone who supports President Putin's dictatorship in Russia, or China's one-party system, speaking ill of the West, the United States, NATO, Europe, and even Israel, have the courage and the ability to do so, living in Russia and criticizing Russian politics, or to create an opposition political party in China? The imperfect West at least gives everyone the freedom to criticize, protest, and demonstrate. It allows anyone to create a political force, and if credible, to win elections, govern, and make laws. This partial freedom is invaluable and must be defended at all costs.

Those who criticize investments in Europe's defense with banal and meaningless slogans like "no to weapons" certainly lack the ability to reason, using logic, common sense, and practicality. If the major military powers, which are armed, do not also give up their weapons, proportionately, a militarily weak Europe would easily be invaded and dominated by those who do not give up their weapons. Therefore, the fake pacifists are either stupid and ignorant, or corrupt, serving the interests of the various superpowers and dictatorships. We sincerely pity those who support such squalid political forces, which do not value freedom. Everyone is against weapons, as long as they are reduced and eliminated from all countries, not just a few. Otherwise, we are working for the strong "bad guys," and not for our own citizens.

To those who demand that Ukraine cede its territories in exchange for peace, we ask: if we forcibly occupied some rooms in their homes, would they give them to us, so as not to fight to defend them? And to those who say Europe is not helping Ukraine survive, we ask: if we came to their homes, by force, wouldn't they want help from their neighbors? Would they like to be left alone? International politics is very simple: all promises made must be honored, without allowing anyone, by any means, to fail to do so. Let us remember that Russia had sworn to defend Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity in exchange for its nuclear arsenal, over 1,900 missiles, with full guarantees from the United States and the United Kingdom. By failing to honor the Budapest Memorandum, with the occupation of Crimea, and the subsequent cowardly invasion, the reliability and loyalty of Russian policy were demonstrated . The West stood by and watched, as it did in 1939, when Nazi Germany invaded Poland. Intelligent and determined intervention by the rest of the world would have averted World War II, with tens of millions of deaths. Bullies are not fought with banal phrases, or unarmed, throwing flowers, but with popular uprisings that ensure their fate, which all dictators deserve: arrest, investigation, indictment, and, if found guilty, sentencing. We are not for the death penalty, under any circumstances, but for rendering harmless all cruel, dictatorial, and therefore dangerous people.

Enough with the rhetoric that Russia liberated Eastern Europe from the threat of Nazi-fascism. Everyone knows it wasn't Russia, but the entire Soviet Union (including Ukraine), that did it, but only thanks to the help of money, weapons, steel, and other technological components from the United States. Otherwise, German would have been spoken, even in Russia, and throughout the Soviet Union. But we don't look at the whole story; we often choose to tell only what suits us, eliminating the parts that don't prove us right.

To those seeking geopolitical, or even partially invented, reasons to justify the Russian invasion, we ask a simple question: what does it mean to be a sovereign, free, and independent country? Every people and every country should be able to freely choose, without asking anyone's permission, which military or economic alliance to join. If many countries surrounding Russia choose to join NATO, it is only because of Russia's unreliability and dangerousness, which does not hesitate to invade neighboring countries it had sworn to defend. The United States has never invaded its allies; on the contrary, it liberated them from fascist dictatorships.

To those who say that Russia is defending itself, we ask: what sane country would attack a military superpower that possesses nearly 8,000 nuclear warheads? Be logical and use common sense. No one threatens Russia, but Russia itself threatens and attacks militarily, and almost always interferes in the elections, of neighboring countries.

DirectDemocracyS and everyone involved guarantees everyone the freedom to think differently, but as we always repeat, we should take a 360-degree view, carefully analyzing all available data and verifying all sources. Once this is done, we must use only and exclusively: logic, common sense, truth, research, and mutual respect, without any preference.

Anyone who sides with the bully (President Putin's Russia) and fails to help and support the bullied (Ukraine) by all means not only fails to use logic, common sense, truth, education, and mutual respect, without any preference, but can only be defined in three ways, and we say this without offending anyone: stupid, ignorant, or corrupt.

We know that Ukraine has many faults and shortcomings, some of which include: discrimination against other nationalities, discrimination against the Russian Orthodox religion, the use of force to respond to provocations and violent actions organized on its territory by the Russians, and the evident and very serious corruption in many sectors. But no reason justifies so many deaths, so many injuries, so much destruction, and so much fear for the entire world, especially for the Ukrainian and Russian people, and all those living in conflict zones worldwide.

Something perhaps not everyone understands: if Russia were gifted Ukrainian territories, as happened with Crimea, would it stop, or, like Hitler, would it press on, even invading friendly countries with which it had signed treaties? Furthermore, would the conquered areas live freely and happily, in a true democracy, or would they be subjected to despicable dictatorships? Finally, who would exploit the conquered territories and their associated riches? Certainly not by those entitled to them, namely the respective populations. Not even the Russian people would gain anything, because the ones controlling everything, and truly profiting, would be a few Russian oligarchs, without any merit or competence. It would also be a failure for those few nostalgic communists who believe that the Nazi-fascist President Putin will restore the pathetic and false greatness of the failed communist ideology, which had many flaws, but at least claimed to be peaceful, despite being a false pacifist and a historic utopia.

The West, the European Union, the United States, Israel, and all the freest and most partially democratic countries certainly have many flaws, with systems that transform into oligarchic partycracies after elections, but at least they allow the birth and implementation of the DirectDemocracyS system. In dictatorial systems, our presence will be permitted only by the determination, courage, and intelligent choices of their respective populations, and certainly not by the peaceful cooperation of the political forces that control their countries through force and violence.

So, while we have no enemies, we will never support anyone who does not implement total freedom and authentic democracy, which for us, and for every person, should be non-negotiable.

To achieve true peace, true and complete disarmament, we will have to wait for DirectDemocracyS to win elections in every country in the world. Only then will we all live in a truly just, equitable, fair, reliable, prosperous, and secure world, for the good of all the world's people.

Ours is not a utopia, nor even a hope, but a certainty based on the validity of the system we are all creating together.

DirectDemocracyS does not seek to teach anything, but rather to provide everyone with all the information they need to form a more accurate and useful opinion, for the good of all.

The only political force born to unite, and not to win elections on divisions.

We share all power, with all who join us, and we will not allow this power to be exploited by a few rich, powerful, and famous individuals, groups, or lobbies.

We have created a system structured to prevent any dictatorship, eliminate any discrimination , and prevent any possible problems.

If you like it, get informed and join us; if you don't, stick with the old ways. But if you criticize us, at least let it be informed, competent, logical, and common-sense criticism. A plea: don't be superficial, and above all, lazy; be the true protagonists, along with the rest of us!

Of all possible systems, the capitalist one is better than the statist one, because despite its many imperfections and injustices, it can be changed and improved by continuously implementing equality and meritocracy over time, always together. Statism is a rotten system, riddled with problems, including corruption and backwardness, and is certainly doomed to failure.

Of all political systems, the relatively free and partially democratic Western political forces are always preferable to various dictatorships. Whether they are oligarchic dictatorships like in Russia, where all the country's wealth is given away to incompetent individuals who control and manage the most important companies, or one-party, one-way dictatorships like in China, where fake communism creates regime billionaires who are extremely wealthy, and the population, deprived of any rights, lives in poverty. We will never be in favor of political forces that tolerate no opposition and often even physically eliminate their opponents.

Some examples that explain our motivations.

Would anyone who supports President Putin's dictatorship in Russia, or China's one-party system, speaking ill of the West, the United States, NATO, Europe, and even Israel, have the courage and the ability to do so, living in Russia and criticizing Russian politics, or to create an opposition political party in China? The imperfect West at least gives everyone the freedom to criticize, protest, and demonstrate. It allows anyone to create a political force, and if credible, to win elections, govern, and make laws. This partial freedom is invaluable and must be defended at all costs.

Those who criticize investments in Europe's defense with banal and meaningless slogans like "no to weapons" certainly lack the ability to reason, using logic, common sense, and practicality. If the major military powers, which are armed, do not also give up their weapons, proportionately, a militarily weak Europe would easily be invaded and dominated by those who do not give up their weapons. Therefore, the fake pacifists are either stupid and ignorant, or corrupt, serving the interests of the various superpowers and dictatorships. We sincerely pity those who support such squalid political forces, which do not value freedom. Everyone is against weapons, as long as they are reduced and eliminated from all countries, not just a few. Otherwise, we are working for the strong "bad guys," and not for our own citizens.

To those who demand that Ukraine cede its territories in exchange for peace, we ask: if we forcibly occupied some rooms in their homes, would they give them to us, so as not to fight to defend them? And to those who say Europe is not helping Ukraine survive, we ask: if we came to their homes, by force, wouldn't they want help from their neighbors? Would they like to be left alone? International politics is very simple: all promises made must be honored, without allowing anyone, by any means, to fail to do so. Let us remember that Russia had sworn to defend Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity in exchange for its nuclear arsenal, over 1,900 missiles, with full guarantees from the United States and the United Kingdom. By failing to honor the Budapest Memorandum, with the occupation of Crimea, and the subsequent cowardly invasion, the reliability and loyalty of Russian policy were demonstrated . The West stood by and watched, as it did in 1939, when Nazi Germany invaded Poland. Intelligent and determined intervention by the rest of the world would have averted World War II, with tens of millions of deaths. Bullies are not fought with banal phrases, or unarmed, throwing flowers, but with popular uprisings that ensure their fate, which all dictators deserve: arrest, investigation, indictment, and, if found guilty, sentencing. We are not for the death penalty, under any circumstances, but for rendering harmless all cruel, dictatorial, and therefore dangerous people.

Enough with the rhetoric that Russia liberated Eastern Europe from the threat of Nazi-fascism. Everyone knows it wasn't Russia, but the entire Soviet Union (including Ukraine), that did it, but only thanks to the help of money, weapons, steel, and other technological components from the United States. Otherwise, German would have been spoken, even in Russia, and throughout the Soviet Union. But we don't look at the whole story; we often choose to tell only what suits us, eliminating the parts that don't prove us right.

To those seeking geopolitical, or even partially invented, reasons to justify the Russian invasion, we ask a simple question: what does it mean to be a sovereign, free, and independent country? Every people and every country should be able to freely choose, without asking anyone's permission, which military or economic alliance to join. If many countries surrounding Russia choose to join NATO, it is only because of Russia's unreliability and dangerousness, which does not hesitate to invade neighboring countries it had sworn to defend. The United States has never invaded its allies; on the contrary, it liberated them from fascist dictatorships.

To those who say that Russia is defending itself, we ask: what sane country would attack a military superpower that possesses nearly 8,000 nuclear warheads? Be logical and use common sense. No one threatens Russia, but Russia itself threatens and attacks militarily, and almost always interferes in the elections, of neighboring countries.

DirectDemocracyS and everyone involved guarantees everyone the freedom to think differently, but as we always repeat, we should take a 360-degree view, carefully analyzing all available data and verifying all sources. Once this is done, we must use only and exclusively: logic, common sense, truth, research, and mutual respect, without any preference.

Anyone who sides with the bully (President Putin's Russia) and fails to help and support the bullied (Ukraine) by all means not only fails to use logic, common sense, truth, education, and mutual respect, without any preference, but can only be defined in three ways, and we say this without offending anyone: stupid, ignorant, or corrupt.

We know that Ukraine has many faults and shortcomings, some of which include: discrimination against other nationalities, discrimination against the Russian Orthodox religion, the use of force to respond to provocations and violent actions organized on its territory by the Russians, and the evident and very serious corruption in many sectors. But no reason justifies so many deaths, so many injuries, so much destruction, and so much fear for the entire world, especially for the Ukrainian and Russian people, and all those living in conflict zones worldwide.

Something perhaps not everyone understands: if Russia were gifted Ukrainian territories, as happened with Crimea, would it stop, or, like Hitler, would it press on, even invading friendly countries with which it had signed treaties? Furthermore, would the conquered areas live freely and happily, in a true democracy, or would they be subjected to despicable dictatorships? Finally, who would exploit the conquered territories and their associated riches? Certainly not by those entitled to them, namely the respective populations. Not even the Russian people would gain anything, because the ones controlling everything, and truly profiting, would be a few Russian oligarchs, without any merit or competence. It would also be a failure for those few nostalgic communists who believe that the Nazi-fascist President Putin will restore the pathetic and false greatness of the failed communist ideology, which had many flaws, but at least claimed to be peaceful, despite being a false pacifist and a historic utopia.

The West, the European Union, the United States, Israel, and all the freest and most partially democratic countries certainly have many flaws, with systems that transform into oligarchic partycracies after elections, but at least they allow the birth and implementation of the DirectDemocracyS system. In dictatorial systems, our presence will be permitted only by the determination, courage, and intelligent choices of their respective populations, and certainly not by the peaceful cooperation of the political forces that control their countries through force and violence.

So, while we have no enemies, we will never support anyone who does not implement total freedom and authentic democracy, which for us, and for every person, should be non-negotiable.

To achieve true peace, true and complete disarmament, we will have to wait for DirectDemocracyS to win elections in every country in the world. Only then will we all live in a truly just, equitable, fair, reliable, prosperous, and secure world, for the good of all the world's people.

Ours is not a utopia, nor even a hope, but a certainty based on the validity of the system we are all creating together.

DirectDemocracyS does not seek to teach anything, but rather to provide everyone with all the information they need to form a more accurate and useful opinion, for the good of all.

The only political force born to unite, and not to win elections on divisions.

We share all power, with all who join us, and we will not allow this power to be exploited by a few rich, powerful, and famous individuals, groups, or lobbies.

We have created a system structured to prevent any dictatorship, eliminate any discrimination , and prevent any possible problems.

If you like it, get informed and join us; if you don't, stick with the old ways. But if you criticize us, at least let it be informed, competent, logical, and common-sense criticism. A plea: don't be superficial, and above all, lazy; be the true protagonists, along with the rest of us!

Welcome to the DirectDemocracyS website. For us, it is a pleasure and an honor to have you here.

Everything in a nutshell.

DirectDemocracyS: Democratic and meritocratic revolution. An ever-expanding system (politics, economics, finance, social). Each member is a co-owner, with total control and shared leadership. Website: directdemocracys.org. Study thoroughly before judging!

Our strengths: DirectDemocracyS is an innovative system, an alternative to all others, created to change and improve the world.
An infinite, ever-expanding universe composed of countless projects, with various activities, such as: political activity, business, financial investments, economic activities, multimedia, communication, social activities, sports, education, information, a charitable foundation, and many others.
The gateway to this system is our political organization.
All our activities are based on logic, common sense, truth, study, and mutual respect. We implement and guarantee for everyone, always together, continuously: equality and meritocracy.
To join us, all you need to do is register and create a personal profile, absolutely free, simple, fast, and secure, with no obligation to be present or to participate in any activities with us. Each of our users has the right to remain completely invisible forever, both externally and internally, and can remain completely anonymous forever by choosing a username that can be a nickname or a random code.
All our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities (and therefore with the right to vote), automatically make up our truly and completely shared leadership.
All our official members automatically receive a single, non-transferable and non-cumulative individual share, making them collective owners of our entire system.
DirectDemocracyS is the only system, and the only political force in the world, that allows our users/voters absolute management and complete control over their official/political representatives, before, during, and for the first and only time in the world, even after elections.
All our decisions are made with the fullest discretion, for the good and interests of the entire world population. Before voting democratically, all our users and groups are fully, freely, independently, neutrally, incorruptibly, and competently informed by our expert panels. These panels are composed of our official members (thus with a vested interest in conducting professional work), with declared expertise, demonstrated with comprehensive documentation, all fully verified, and guaranteed.
Our entire system adopts the best and most modern technologies, constantly updated, which, together with all our rules, methodologies, instructions, and motivations, respected by all, make DirectDemocracyS safe, orderly, and impeccably organized.
We are self-financed and conduct all our activities exclusively on our platforms, to always remain free, independent, neutral, and optimally protected.
We have rules for decision-making, with votes that are open, verifiable, free, and always motivated. We always assume full responsibility, individually, as a group, and collectively, for all the consequences of our decisions and all our votes.
We have many other characteristics, and infinite activities, that make us unique, pioneering, inimitable, the most fair, just, competent, meritocratic, professional, and secure.
To join us, read this informative article at this link:
https://free.directdemocracys.org/law/rules/activity-rules/registration-rules/registration-form
After reading it carefully, register and create your personal profile at this link:
https://free.directdemocracys.org/register

We are often asked to summarize our entire system in a few words, and although it is impossible to summarize DirectDemocracyS in a few sentences, we want to try.

To communicate directly with us, according to your needs, you can go directly to our website dedicated entirely to contact forms.

https://contacts.directdemocracys.org/

To access our platforms, all you need is an Internet connection, using any device: PC, tablet, smartphone, and any browser, using any operating system.

For those with very old versions of various operating systems, for obvious security reasons, we recommend updating to a more recent version, even though, technically, all of our websites work with any system.

DirectDemocracyS uses only websites with the domain name: directdemocracys.org. To view our public areas, or to contact us and use our features, you are not required to join us. You are welcome to do so as our visitors; just scroll down a little further on our websites.

To access our reserved areas and participate in various activities with us, you must join us by registering using a registration form, which allows you to create a personal profile.

We remind you of one fundamental rule: each person can join us only once by registering and creating a personal profile, providing their real personal information (name, surname, date of birth, habitual residence) in the registration form. We recommend providing your real personal information, which will be verified if you wish to qualify for higher user levels, and must match the information initially provided in the registration form. This real personal information will be encrypted and made invisible, both internally and externally.

You can join us while remaining completely invisible (both internally and externally), and you can choose to remain completely anonymous.

To join us, you must choose a username, which can be a nickname or a random code of letters, numbers, and special characters, in any language in the world, and a password of at least 12 characters (non-consecutive numbers, uppercase and lowercase letters, and special characters). You must have a personal email address (not a temporary one), and a valid phone number, which will be verified by our system.

For the free user type, everything is absolutely free, with no obligation to be present, and without any obligation to carry out activities with us.

During certain periods, all new registrations are blocked; during other periods, registrations are only possible by official invitation; during other periods, registrations are only possible by simple invitation; and during other periods, all registrations are free.

There are 2 types of top users: registered users with verified and guaranteed identity, who have the right to vote, and are therefore part of our truly and completely shared leadership, and our official members, who are collective owners of our entire system.

To have a higher user type, you must pay an annual fee in advance , based on your age at the time of payment, users up to 31 years old pay 50% of the respective annual fee, and based on the user type.

You must have been a user for a certain period of time, have a certain number of points, and be officially invited by our higher-level users, who assume full responsibility for both the identity of each invited person (checked with the help of our special security teams) and the behavior of each invited person, who will be linked to the personal profile of the higher-level user inviting the lower-level user.

If you pay an annual fee in advance, you first become a free user, and the one-year period is not counted until you meet all the necessary requirements and are officially designated as the user type for which you paid in advance.

Questions and Answers.

Why do I have to provide my real personal data in the registration form?

Because we present ourselves to the world with hundreds of informative articles about ourselves, and with extensive details about our system. Personal data, and the data we request in some of our forms, helps us better understand those who join us, those who contact us, and those who collaborate with us, including externally. We also use it to verify in the future whether the person who joined us was honest from the beginning. Anyone can choose to remain permanently anonymous, and completely invisible to anyone, inside or outside our platforms.

Why do I need a non-temporary personal email address?

Temporary email addresses are not usable after completing the registration form. The email address is used to receive notifications (according to your preferences and settings) and the most important messages from our system. It is also used to recover your password or username if you forget it.

Why do I have to provide a valid phone number?

Because our system receives and sends a huge amount of email every day, and often, even for extended periods, many email service providers place us in their SPAM (junk mail) folders, even though all our messages are legitimate, encrypted, and secure. Sometimes they blacklist our email server (which handles all incoming and outgoing messages), which allows us to receive emails from anyone but prevents us from replying. A valid phone number, unique to each of our users, allows us to reply, even to those who cannot be reached by our emails.

Why do you require certain types of users to upload an identity document to your platforms?

We're not the only ones in the world; many other websites and social networks require you to upload an identity document that matches the personal information you provided in the registration form. For the free membership, you don't have to upload anything, but you obviously have access to less "important" reserved areas and thus enjoy less potential.

Why do you require certain types of users to have an image file, which is essentially a selfie, with the user's face clearly visible, and a valid ID with a photograph?

For certain user types, we verify that the personal data matches that of the ID document, and that the ID document's photo matches the image file. This is an additional security measure for the most important user types, which allows access to more sensitive, restricted areas with greater potential. We do not force anyone, in any way, to publish their image on our platforms, but the image file is necessary to ensure enhanced security measures. In the identity verification video call, for higher user types, we will verify that the personal data initially provided in the registration form matches the uploaded ID document, which in turn must match the image file (a selfie with the face next to the ID document). This image file must be replicated live when requested by the operator, who will record the video call for subsequent verification.

How come you verify the identity of higher-level users?

In almost every country in the world, to vote in elections, you first need to be identified and then cast your vote. In our system, too, we verify your identity to allow you to vote and, through your vote, become part of our truly and fully shared leadership. Our official members, who collectively own our entire system, are required to have a verified and guaranteed identity so that we can automatically register in their name the sole, non-cumulative, and non-transferable individual share that makes them the owner of our entire system, along with all our official members.

Why is it that, in order to become an official representative, or a political representative, I also have to personally identify myself, through an in-person meeting, in a public space, with representatives of the special security groups?

Personal identity verification is mandatory for anyone wishing to officially represent our system, internally or externally, or to politically represent our voters (registered users with verified and guaranteed identities, and our official members) in real elections, after obtaining the required votes, or in our closed online primaries. For these types of users, checks are more stringent, including financial, health, and skill checks, to prevent any potential problems. As public figures, they must be verified and tested to ensure their incorruptibility. These health, cultural, and financial checks, and other types, are already successfully used in many of the world's most civilized countries to monitor and verify the incorruptibility of their political representatives. These seemingly invasive checks enable us to create fact-based rankings, allowing our users, authorized to vote in our closed online primaries, and our voters in real elections, to choose their representatives, knowing the results of our checks, based on meritocratic and competent rankings. To change and improve the world, a conscious and informed choice is essential, in a correct, neutral, independent, free, and democratic manner.

The gradual nature of the checks allows us to achieve the best results, for the good of all.

Why do we only work on our own platforms and websites, which are private?

Our system is based on self-financing through voluntary donations, annual dues, advertising contracts, and other methods. Thanks to careful management and a lack of unnecessary expenses, we can remain forever free, independent, neutral, and protected by the best security measures. Our platforms and all our websites are and will forever remain the property of all our official members. Anyone who meets all the requirements can become an official member, and anyone who wishes can join us, according to our rules. We are not a secret sect, but we carefully select the most suitable people to join us at various stages of our journey. We do not reject any application, but we postpone registration and activation until the best time for anyone who wishes to join our immense family.

There are no logical reasons to challenge our motives, which are based on common sense, mutual respect, and ensuring equality and meritocracy for all, always and forever.