User and group rules

At DirectDemocracyS, some information is made public—on average, 1% of what we decide—and what we publish internally is made known at the right time, more or less to everyone externally.

Even within our community, the actions of groups or individual users are not made public to those who are not members or involved in certain activities.

There are many reasons, but among the most important, and often misunderstood, is the most fundamental: to avoid creating chaos and uncertainty. Not everyone is interested in all our activities and decisions, and if we published everything we did, it would be truly difficult for anyone to find the information they needed.

We have many support groups within our organization, with numerous contact forms, so you can find all the information you need quickly, easily, and securely.

If we made all the information about everyone who joined us public, and showed all the groups and public pages, our public dashboard, which we only use with permission, would become too crowded—literally millions of posts of all kinds every day. And with our continued growth, it would be difficult to operate efficiently in a short time.

In one of the articles, we clearly explain that this chaos, and this disordered and disorganized "abundance of activity," generates uncertainty and causes everyone to waste a lot of precious time.

Think about how much useless stuff you see on traditional social media, tens, maybe hundreds of minutes spent every day scrolling pointlessly until you find things that really interest you.

Many people accused us from the outside that, despite having all the potential of a traditional social network, we didn't allow friend requests, and many other features, but they will be implemented slowly and gradually, with great care, so as not to cause inconvenience.

In this case: think about how many useless and uninteresting messages you receive from relatives, friends, and contacts. You have two options: not read them, and in many cases delete them, perhaps missing out on very important and interesting content; or, read everything you receive, again wasting a lot of time. We offer everyone only the information they need, based on their interests and wishes, avoiding unnecessary time.

If we allowed anyone to post anything publicly, even on their personal profile, we'd have hundreds of thousands of people every day greeting you as they come and go, millions wishing you a happy holiday or birthday, or telling you about their lives, or, out of personal boredom, trying to bore others. These are pointless activities, more suited to traditional social networks than to us, a very important and innovative system.

Let's be clear: we're not demonizing traditional social networks, nor do we allow ourselves to judge those who regularly use them, including many of our users, who have had, and continue to have, traditional social profiles outside of our system.

Their usefulness for reuniting with relatives and friends, and introducing new people, is undeniable. They also inform and misinform at the same time, and they teach many people both positive and negative things. Some of the things on your social media feeds and traditional websites are also useful, and even entertaining. But we have a different role, and much of it is orderly, organized, and safe.

In our system, we value each person's time, and we strive, with perfect success, to minimize the waste of it, whether for anyone outside of our organization or especially for those who have courageously and generously joined us for the common good.

At this point, we had to make a choice: allow unorganized freedom, or create the conditions for true freedom—complete, yet orderly, and optimally organized. As always, we made the best choice: creating groups that allow anyone to instantly find endless activities of interest.

We could have used, or created, an algorithm that, based on previous choices, would show you only things that interest you, but since our and your tastes, our and your preferences, and in general the things we like, evolve, change, and amplify, we would have risked showing you, and knowing, only a few things, of the infinite possibilities, potential, and activities that take place within our system.

We have therefore chosen to provide each of our official members, through a dedicated 24/7 support service, with all the information, instructions, and available options, so they can directly choose what to do, when to do it, how to do it, and above all, who to do it with.

If by chance, an activity of their interest, of any kind, does not exist, any of our official members can have one created by our activity creation groups, or, after requesting and obtaining authorization, they can create it themselves.

At this point, every single person who has an idea, a project, or a personal interest, has literally an infinite number of possibilities.

The only requirement is to request and obtain all necessary permissions from our permissions groups, which anyone can join according to very detailed implementation rules.

We rarely deny someone the opportunity to express their potential, or participate in certain activities, or create their own creations—whatever they choose. If we forbid something, anything, we do so only for valid reasons.

Of course, if similar activities or groups already exist where they could develop their idea, they'll be informed of the various options. Alternatively, they can freely create, or personally develop (always requesting and obtaining permission), all the necessary capabilities to optimally realize each individual idea and project, implementing them in groups. They can then join existing groups or create new ones.

If you decide to create your own group, our system offers the ability to have all the people you need, not only to create the activity itself, but also to have experts to make it better and more useful for you and others. You can decide to leave your group open to other interested people, or carefully select the people who will be accepted into the various groups, evaluating and deciding (via internal group voting) whether to admit new members who request it.

Having the ongoing support of specialists and collaborating with countless other groups makes project creation, discussion, selection, testing, evaluation, and approval, along with their implementation, not only easier and faster, but thanks to the work of so many groups and individuals, everything is done professionally.

Imagine that with the implementation of technological activities, which include the creation of our own Artificial Intelligence (ddsAI), with human bridges, represented by groups composed of our human specialists, everything we do together will be practically perfect, or, as we always say, will be very close to perfect.

If you decide to create and implement everything yourself, you can do so, although to be evaluated, reviewed, and eventually implemented in our system, each project and idea must first be decided upon and voted on by a group. You can create your own group for each idea and each project, but you must bring at least five other people with you to work together before submitting it to the evaluation groups for the various activities and having them voted on and approved by the authorization groups for the various activities.

At this point, many people will say: it's not for me, it's too complicated, it takes too long, and it requires too many authorizations. If the idea or project is already ready, it can be implemented now. All that's needed is a concrete proposal, which must be presented to the evaluation group, which in turn, after studying and evaluating it, presents it to the authorization group, which votes on it and makes it final. Therefore, by the time you read the previous sentence, it would have already been authorized. Obviously, depending on the importance and type of activity, it may be necessary to obtain authorization from all special groups (for almost everything), or, in many cases, the vote of our shared leadership (all our users with verified and guaranteed identities) will be needed, with the necessary percentages of votes, based on detailed implementation rules. In any case, everything is very simple, fast, and secure.

It often happens that such detailed rules, such specific and clear methodologies, and exceptional security measures are mistaken by superficial people for limitations on freedom of expression. However, we are the only ones who make all people truly and completely free , as long as their individual and group freedom does not take away the freedoms of other people or groups. This perfect balance, which we have all created and implemented together, makes DirectDemocracyS unique and inimitable.

How many hasty and completely senseless assessments are made, and will always be made, by those who don't know us? They must be infinite, as the superficiality, ignorance, and stupidity of so many people is infinite in many cases; otherwise, if it were not so, the world would certainly be different, and better.

We talk about it in this informative article at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/fundamental-questions/our-motivations/lots-of-controversy

There are no better “models” or systems, and there will never be any, because DirectDemocracyS was created to prevent anyone from using the system for personal purposes, in an ethically and morally incorrect manner, thereby obtaining undeserved advantages and benefits.

Simply put, no one can be smart, but everything you achieve must be deserved, documented, and earned, with a lot of time, and a lot of hard work.

Obviously, personal gain, and that of the groups involved, is directly proportional to the validity and collective utility of personal and group work.

These are very important concepts, which will be clarified, as always, at the right time.

We advise you to think about every word, every sentence, of this informative article, and you will understand many of the reasons behind our system.

These are not trivial choices, or superficial decisions, but absolutely necessary, to make our enormous mechanism function optimally.

This article completes and integrates this one:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/law/instructions/for-users/new-users/what-you-should-never-do