User Strategy

When it comes to planning, one of the fundamental activities is certainly strategy.

In this article, we'll discuss our strategy for our users, which is based on ethical, moral, and structural principles, based on logic, common sense, mutual respect, fairness, equality, meritocracy, justice, order, discipline, organization, and security.

A little history, to understand, and to get to know each other better.

Everyone knows that DirectDemocracyS is a collective idea, created by five people who, at a party, had gone off to one side and started chatting about the world they lived in. They started with the usual clichés, like: we really live in a shitty, unjust, unequal, and insecure world.

A single opening sentence encapsulates all the reasons why we created DirectDemocracyS. The recognition of the real-life situation in which people lived back then already defines our unique and inimitable style, in which we discuss everything directly, without hiding problems, and without the possibility of misunderstanding.

At one point one of them said: we should change and improve the world!

A second sentence encapsulates all the goals of our system. Not just change, which all the losers of the old, failed, unjust, inequitable, and insecure traditional politics promise, but also an improvement in the world we live in. Combining various words, in sentences, to express concepts that, disjoined, lack the same effectiveness and completeness, is an important characteristic of ours.

One of them said: To do this we will have to start with politics.

The only effective way to achieve optimal results, for the good of all, is to do it with politics, but also with a modern and efficient system.

These opening remarks were followed by a brief but intense debate, in which ideas and projects were proposed and discussed, which later became our system, which everyone will sooner or later know. It was the first meeting of DirectDemocracyS, what even then was jokingly defined by those who were unconsciously part of it: a "crazy" project!

They immediately realized that all other systems, and all other political forces, were impossible to change and improve, irreparable, and destined to implode and fail. It was impossible to even "fight" against the various lobbies that, over thousands of years, had created the world we live in and had taken every precaution to resist any possible attempt at change and improvement. In a direct confrontation with these systems, we would have wasted a lot of precious time, only to be defeated. For these reasons, we decided that DirectDemocracyS had to be, and remain forever, completely innovative, and an absolute alternative to everything that existed, without ever "mixing"—except in a very careful and calculated manner—with all the other ways of carrying out various activities.

We created a complete system from scratch, all together, rewriting all the rules, methodologies, paradigms, and even the names of everything, but having ideals, values, and principles, always based on logic, common sense, truth, and mutual respect.

Certainly a smart and very courageous choice, but also very complicated and full of challenges, requiring a great deal of time and hard work from everyone who joins us. We have chosen the most difficult path, but the only possible one.

Good ideas and winning projects weren't enough; we needed to engage and empower every person joining our five creators and innovators. We decided from the very beginning to create our own platforms—free, independent, and, above all, secure, without much external involvement. A costly choice, but one that will forever guarantee us countless advantages and benefits.

You all know that the first 277 people joined, from many countries, bringing their expertise in their respective fields of work and study. Together with the first five users, they wrote the fundamental rules, deciding from the very beginning that DirectDemocracyS should not have a traditional leadership, but rather be a system in which every person who joined us, after identity verification, became an equal member of a truly and completely shared leadership, where decisions on everything could be made together. Over time, it was decided to create working groups for each activity and to divide the decisions to be made into important ones, to be decided together; medium-important ones, to be decided in various groups with the authorization of all five special groups; and less important decisions (mainly simple implementation rules), to be decided in a few groups. However, each official member was given the option to consider certain decisions as unimportant, of medium importance, or, in many cases, of great importance. Specific groups were formed to evaluate these proposals and decide whether the user was right, being able to change the type of decision based on shared rules. That way, while we could change certain assessments, we wouldn't spend all our time voting and making decisions for everything. So, dear friends, at DirectDemocracyS we don't waste our precious time just voting on everything and every single topic, but we delegate certain less important decisions to various groups.

This is our method, in which we start with proposals and individual ideas, to be decided, discussed, implemented, and improved, in various groups, with the final version of the ideas and proposals to be decided and voted on, according to rules based on importance.

The work and activities carried out in numerous groups, composed and managed by countless users, make us a fair and equitable system, where equality is always combined with meritocracy. What not everyone knows is that any of our official members can join all our special groups, and any user with a verified and guaranteed identity can request access and work in numerous groups, ensuring that no one is discriminated against.

To prevent any possible authoritarian drift, and to prevent a few people, or a few groups, from holding too much power, we have made our entire system, according to very detailed rules, the collective property of all its official members.

To prevent upheavals and changes for the interests of a few, we have decided that all our fundamental rules, our fundamental methodologies, our values, our principles, and our ideals cannot be changed except by unanimity (which is unattainable). The reason is simple: we must not forget why we were born, where we want to go, and how we want to get there.

To understand our strategy for our users, the previous premise was necessary. DirectDemocracyS is the result of long, hard collective work; it's not a few people, but all of us, who decide everything, and it will always be that way. Our political organization and our entire system must continually evolve to keep pace with the times, taking into account everything that happens within us and outside our system. Our system may only appear closed in on itself, but in reality, we discuss and collaborate with everyone, while never making compromises of any kind, even at the political level. We make even all paradoxes sensible and consistent with who we are, what we do, and our unique and inimitable method. Despite its seemingly pyramidal structure, DirectDemocracyS features the usual, helpful, loyal, honest, and competitive hierarchies that create progress and concrete results. At the same time, there are also inverted hierarchies, where the base makes decisions, and the "top of the pyramid" implements all the binding decisions made by the base. It may seem impossible, but we manage it perfectly, with excellent results.

Together we are pioneering at every level, changing and improving all paradigms, removing all the negative parts, and preserving, adapting, and improving the very few positive parts of all other systems and all other political forces.

We do the same with everyone who joins us. To join us, they must first open their minds, adapting to our rules and methodologies. These must be studied carefully to determine whether they like what we want to do, how we're doing it, and whether they share our goals. Not everyone has the patience to seek out comprehensive information, and above all, not everyone understands us. This is a great blessing for us, because if everyone knew and understood us, we would be literally inundated with every person familiar with our system.

We've created a strategy for our users that, based on real and concrete equality, always allows us to use natural, meritocratic selection to place the right people, always in the right places. For this reason, we've created very detailed rules for joining us, which we won't repeat in this article.

First, access to information.

As of early October 2025, we have about 360 articles published on our official website, several thousand posts on our blog, in the 56 main languages of the world, but soon they will be available in all the languages of the world, and even in all the dialects of the world.

We have nothing to hide, but we prefer to maintain gradual access to information, based on compatibility and reliability, forever. Public information is just the tip of the iceberg. Meanwhile, in our private areas, for various user types, the informational articles are hundreds of times greater. While our project remains highly detailed, it is not at all complicated. Like everything we have conceived and created together, our implementation rules are always changing, evolving based on our plans, strategies, decisions, and needs. Ultimately, to decide if you like our project, simply read the first article on the front page of our official website. Many thousands of articles in private areas contain rules, methodologies, and instructions, along with their rationale. These articles are useful only to those who are part of our system and only for those who perform certain activities, and therefore are of no interest to those who are not directly involved.

While at the beginning there was only one type of user, and everyone had access to all our activities, over time, and as the number of people joining us increased, we created an infinite number of working groups, dividing our activities, and our platforms, according to the various user types, and even adding different types of profiles, based on the various stages.

We don't discriminate against people, but we're not hypocrites: not everyone is the same, not everyone has the same skills, and not everyone is trustworthy, so not everyone can access certain areas of our platforms. We know full well that many will struggle to understand our motivations, but we assure you that in our place, you would act exactly the same way.

As time goes by, obtaining roles of greater responsibility and importance will be much more difficult, and it will take longer, because it is logical and normal that it should be this way, but we can assure you that, even based on the points accumulated individually, and in the various groups, merit is always recognized, and always rewarded.