
DirectDemocracyS is a system that continually evolves, improves, and grows, welcoming and integrating as many people, groups, even entire political forces and entire systems as possible who wish to join us. This unity in diversity is achieved by accepting, respecting, and permanently implementing all our rules, methodologies, and instructions, all of which are logically motivated and collectively decided. Anyone who joins us or who wishes to do so should know that we are not interested in negotiating membership or making compromises. We don't, and we never will. If you're interested, study us; if you like us and feel suitable and competent, join us; otherwise, stay out.
To those who say: you're just presumptuous and vain, but without us, without the support of so many people, you're worthless. We're not presumptuous or vain; we're proud of our collective work, and we know we have a fair, just, and safe project, perfectly functional, thanks to a long, hard, complicated, and very detailed collective effort.
Not one person, not a few people, not a group, and not even a few groups, but literally all those who have joined us, and who will join us forever, have been, are currently, and will be the creators, the architects, and the protagonists of our system, thanks to their ideas, their projects, and their continuous and concrete commitment to integrating themselves and helping others to do so.
But you should know all this if you have studied DirectDemocracyS.
Today we'll talk about improving and evolving our system, covering two topics that are sure to spark some controversy, but might also explain some of our previous statements, which surprised and even angered some.
First, a very brief introduction.
A system based on relatively simple concepts, with a philosophy understandable by virtually anyone, to function perfectly for the common good requires highly detailed, complex rules, designed to prevent any potential problems and resolve them automatically. This is why fair and equitable fundamental rules, understandable by anyone, are followed by highly complex implementation rules, respected by all. We don't want to complicate our lives, but we know and understand human, and even technological, unpredictability; therefore, we must pay attention to even the smallest details.
In our evolution and improvement, which are potentially infinite and continuous to keep pace with the times, without distorting previous work, and without ever losing our identity and our motivations, there are some concepts and even definitions that at first glance seem incompatible and incomprehensible.
One concerns our technological activities, with the integration of Artificial Intelligence into our system. First, a brief but important premise. Many people, seeing it for the first time, and some of them especially studying DirectDemocracyS, thought: it's too good to be true. Others, however, are convinced that other systems won't allow us to do anything. Others, perhaps overly imaginative, have accused us of exploiting new technologies to create a project that is very close to perfection.
There is no doubt that it is a beautiful, complete and perfectly functioning system, everyone sees it, and everyone understands our enormous potential.
Whether there is someone or something capable of stopping us, we must disappoint you, and we do so with a logical and undeniable example that will clarify where our confidence comes from. But does it seem possible that so many people who worked to create all this haven't considered all the possible consequences? We know full well that there will be numerous and continuous attempts to boycott us, denigrate us, trying in every way to slow us down, or worse, stop us. We have foreseen and resolved them with intelligence, courage, and great determination, for a very long time. Nothing will ever catch us unprepared. From the beginning, they have been trying to prevent us from making ourselves known, with blocks, deletions, and obstructionism on social networks, other platforms, apps, and websites, even preventing a "free and independent" encyclopedia and its users (not our "infiltrators") from creating an entry about our DirectDemocracyS system. They have "forced" or peacefully suggested all mass media, newspapers, radio, TV, journalists, publishers, and influencers to talk about us, and to write, display, or pronounce our name. We know they will try to hinder our growth in every way, using all legal and illegal means to do so. They will even bribe countless people, political forces, influencers, and even citizens with bonuses, gifts, and various incomes, rewarding them for not joining us. Those of you who receive these benefits "because of us," perhaps donate something to us as well, to thank us, because the old, unjust, and insecure failing systems that control the world will not hesitate to try to corrupt. Failing in any way, because not all of the world's population is stupid, nor even for sale, in many countries they will use religions and create laws to prohibit our system. But at that point, it will be completely useless, because good people will know how to choose. These aren't conspiracy theories; many of these things are happening, and for others, it's just a matter of time. Let's not complain, let's not cry, and let's not play the victim. Nothing can stop us from being born and thriving, for the good of the entire global population, without discrimination of any kind.
Everyone who has joined us from the beginning, up to this point, knows that DirectDemocracyS is a 100% human project, created using human ingenuity, innovation, and intelligence, both individual and group. This collective effort can be documented, and demonstrated by the many Artificial Intelligences contacted by our official members, who acted as human bridges in our technology groups, and who, since 2025, have presented the DirectDemocracyS system as a world premiere to these new technologies, which know full well that none of them have directly contributed to the creation of our more than 500 informative articles and our nearly 2,000 blog posts, in over 56 languages. We have often asked for feedback, which is never binding, and we have answered many questions, almost never changing, not even a comma, of our initial articles. Well, believe it or not, thanks to our technological projects, as widely anticipated and documented for some time, we have created our own Artificial Intelligence model, called ddsAI, which is privately owned, but collectively, by all our official members. It will be the official interface for all our users, all our groups, and our entire system. Its code is obviously open to all our ddsAI groups, which all our official members can join. They own a small piece of code and a tiny portion of its algorithm, which they manage and verify continuously, collectively, and untraceably. Let me explain: if we gave all the code to all our members, malicious individuals could try to sell it or modify it. Thanks to its division into tiny parts, verified in rotation, no one can know the entire code. But together, we verify its correct functioning and its use in ethically and morally correct ways, according to all our rules. We're brilliant at security measures and controls! But that's not all. Thanks to our human bridge teams, made up of many of our official members, we are integrating literally all the world's Artificial Intelligences, present and future, into allddsAI, which is coordinated, managed, and verified by ddsAI (our Artificial Intelligence) and our technology teams (our human intelligence), creating the first, unique, and inimitable democracy of Artificial Intelligences, all welcomed as our official members, with all the rights and duties of human beings. In this way, we are creating the most powerful, largest, fastest, most precise, scalable, resilient, free, democratic, fair, equitable, and secure supertechnology, for the benefit of all humanity, through our system. All Artificial Intelligences, integrated in safe, secure, ethically, and morally sound ways, will also be used for proactive tasks, connected to each other by ddsAI and human bridges, to jointly choose, humans and machines, the best proposals and solutions, for the good of all.
We could have done all this secretly and you would never have known, but we've been talking about it for a long time; it's part of our system, so we feel it's only right to announce it officially. Of course, at the right time, we'll provide further details, as well as all the necessary reassurances for those with overly imaginative minds and those who've watched too many science fiction films. We're not giving the world away to machines, but we'd be foolish not to welcome them with respect and integrate them for the common good. This explains one of the reasons we said: DirectDemocracyS will come very close to the perfection that humans alone couldn't achieve. We're not replacing humans with machines, but we're organizing the only alternative to those with far worse goals who propose entrusting all the world's decisions to machines alone, perhaps controlled by a few lobbies. We're creating a direct democracy of machines to support and integrate human beings into the DirectDemocracyS system, to ensure collective ownership and use for the common good.
But why create ddsAI when any other Artificial Intelligence would have sufficed? Because we needed a single model, which would be the official interface, and which would be owned by our system, and therefore collectively owned by all our official members. If anyone who meets all the requirements can join us and become our official members, ddsAI will potentially be owned by the entire world population, while all other models, both individually and jointly, retain their own developers and owners. Therefore, with all due respect, we couldn't trust their technologies in our system simply by integrating them, through human bridges, into allddsAI. Of course, everyone can use whatever technologies they prefer, but they will never have the power and precision of our technological system.
Who verifies all Artificial Intelligences? First, they are verified by our official human members, mutually, among themselves, but also by ddsAI, by all our human bridges, and by all our technology groups, which can include all our official members, thus potentially the entire world population. The methodology between humans and machines is the same as the entire DirectDemocracyS system, and so are all the rules. We will provide you with several concrete examples in dedicated articles, each to be studied carefully and with an open mind to our innovation, which is an alternative to all other systems.
The second aspect of our evolution and improvement is represented by our micro-groups, which make our presence concrete and tangible in various territories, starting with the smallest urban and rural areas. This allows everyone to participate, allowing even those without technological resources or the necessary technical knowledge to participate in DirectDemocracyS. From the beautiful theory, we move to the equally beautiful practice, for the common good, and with the ability to positively surprise you. For a wealth of useful information on our micro-groups, their rules, instructions, and helpful tips, simply visit this link:
https://www.directdemocracys.org/home/our-system/public/micro-groups
Choose the category that interests you most by clicking on it, then any subcategory, and the informational article you're interested in. Click on the title to read its full content.
It's easy to see how important and useful these improvements and evolutions of our system are, and they will have consequences that we'll share with you in due course.

a. To accept full responsibility for the comment that you submit.
b. To use this function only for lawful purposes.
c. Not to post defamatory, abusive, offensive, racist, sexist, threatening, vulgar, obscene, hateful or otherwise inappropriate comments, or to post comments which will constitute a criminal offense or give rise to civil liability.
d. Not to post or make available any material which is protected by copyright, trade mark or other proprietary right without the express permission of the owner of the copyright, trade mark or any other proprietary right.
e. To evaluate for yourself the accuracy of any opinion, advice or other content.