Changing international law

DirectDemocracyS wants to change and improve the world and to do so it will be necessary to change and improve the Laws, at every level, to achieve the desired results, a better life for all, without discrimination.

Our system clearly aims to eliminate all illegality and violence from around the world, one country at a time, always starting with the country where we win the elections, through the effective prevention of all possible criminal activity and all kinds of conflict.

Anyone who reads just these lines of text, or even hears these words, will call us crazy, dreamers, and will say our system is a beautiful utopia. Others will say: you'll be corrupted like everyone else when you gain power. And surely someone will start to fantasize, saying: these people want to change the laws to become masters of the entire world, one country at a time, and they are dangerous to humanity.

Let's answer the last statement right away, because it's the stupidest one in the world: what exactly are the other systems, which we'll call variant A, doing? They take all the power from the population and give it to a few political forces and representatives, who almost always decide in the interests of a few rich and powerful lobbies. System B, DirectDemocracyS, takes power exactly like all the other systems, then shares it with all its voters, through a truly and completely shared leadership. But we're even so crazy as to share all ownership of our entire system with all our official members. And who can be part of the shared leadership? Anyone. And who can become our official member? Anyone. Don't believe it, it's too good to be true? Read all our public information on our platforms' websites; you'll understand why we were born, where we want to go, and how we intend to get there. Now tell us which variant you prefer: A (old failed systems), B (DirectDemocracyS perfect sharing of power and ownership).

But let's see which variant is more dangerous and risky internationally?

Human history, and current events, demonstrate that old systems are dangerous. Look around you, get comprehensive information, and if you can, affirm that you live in a safe world.

Now imagine a world where the DirectDemocracyS system is applied. Of course, you can't see it, but try to imagine it. Now, if you've been paying attention, and have studied us carefully, with an open mind, and thoroughly, you won't be able to deny that we offer and guarantee a different, better world for everyone. If you don't, it means you like the old system, where the puppeteers pull the strings and the puppets obey. And do you know why the puppets move as the puppeteers order them? We tell you even though we know the truth will bother you: out of superficiality and laziness. System A requires people to give orders and people to obey; system B requires everyone to give orders and everyone to implement them. Again, we ask you: which system is the best? Which is the fairest system?

No one likes to get involved, to work hard, and to become involved in political life, because it's more comfortable to stay on social media venting social hatred, envy, resentment, and frustration. Blaming the systems, politics, and political representatives—all of which are flawed—is a waste of time, but the people who stay home, or work from morning till night, and from night to morning, don't want to waste their precious time being protagonists, deciding what to do, directly and continuously, by those who represent them in institutions. The average person says they don't have the desire or the time to decide for their own well-being; it's better to leave it to others, who will surely act only in the collective interest. Or not? If we, citizens of the world, expect our political representatives to make the right choice, for our common good, we are deluded and also dreamers. The only people in the world who act in the public interest are the entire population. We ask you again: are we really that crazy, so deluded that we can change the world, in DirectDemocracyS? We are merely realists, and the only ones in the world who, thanks to our unique characteristics, can pronounce the magic word: freedom, which in our country leads to the only authentic democracy, direct democracy—and not just any democracy, but ours, which allows no mistakes and prevents anyone from taking advantage of the popular gullibility, superficiality, and laziness of the average person, tired after hard work, who looks at kittens and bullshit on social media, instead of making collective decisions for the present and the future.

But let's talk about how to eliminate violence, lawlessness, and therefore wars, invasions, terrorism, and crime. By implementing the entire DirectDemocracyS system, which bases every activity on logic, common sense, truth, study, and mutual respect among all people. Now we ask you to imagine a way to implement all this, and above all, a world in which all political representatives are obliged by the entire population to act always and only by applying these beautiful and important words on which DirectDemocracyS is based. Of course, those who don't know us will say: easy said, hard done. Our grandparents used to say: there's a world between saying and doing. In practice, according to some who haven't studied us, we're all theory and no practice. Study us and you'll see that, alongside our beautiful, infallible, and almost perfect theory, we also have a well-thought-out strategy to put everything we've said into practice, exactly as and when it's needed. Let's take it all slowly. With intelligence and determination.

Mutual respect for all people. This phrase, if implemented, will practically solve literally all the world's problems, if applied by everyone, for everyone, without discrimination. And that's what we've been saying since the very beginning, and that's exactly what we're doing, one user at a time, at DirectDemocracyS.

Now there will still be people with doubts, wondering: could such a "science fiction" system ever work? We will repeat it as many times as necessary: if you had thoroughly studied all our hundreds of public information articles, and reasoned with a clear mind, not manipulated by years of old systems, you would understand that DirectDemocracyS can only work, and cannot fail, because it "forces" everyone to make the right choice, without manipulation, without brainwashing, without the media influencing your choices, but only with the obligation to respect yourselves and others, and to implement and implement all joint decisions.

International law, as we've seen in various informative articles, is flawed because, if it were clearly formulated, without interpretation, and without the possibility of being violated or misused by the strongest, we wouldn't have any international problems. We don't want to go into the details, but we'll give you a clear example, with a question we posed to various international law experts worldwide. Let's start with a question: how can territorial integrity combined with national sovereignty be reconciled with the self-determination of peoples combined with local autonomy? We'll publish an article discussing international practice and what we'll propose, but we want to give you a preview and a summary. We'll do it in a simple way that everyone can understand. In practice, if a country has several states or territories that wish to become independent, they must do so through negotiations between the central government and the secessionist state. In essence, international law says: reach an agreement among yourselves, or find other solutions. Please remember that we are simplifying, so everyone can understand, but in practice, this is the reality. What if someone seeking autonomy wants to join another state, whether nearby or far away? If the former is not agreed upon, revolts, wars of secession, betrayals, and all kinds of violence could erupt within a sovereign and intact state. If someone seeking independence then wants to unite with a neighboring or faraway state, in that case, if a peaceful agreement is not reached, wars, both internal and external, would erupt, with deaths, injuries, and destruction, all in accordance with international law, which, while it denies and discourages the use of force, in practice allows it unless agreed upon. We won't go into a thousand examples of who wants independence and for what reasons (political interests, wealth, and power), but we will provide you with the simplest, fastest, most peaceful, and safest solution. Implement the DirectDemocracyS system, which provides for fair, equitable, loyal, honest, logical, common-sense, and secure local autonomies. By implementing our rules, methodologies, instructions, and security measures, without any hassle, without arguments, and without any kind of violence, those who want to continue to have an intact and sovereign state will continue to have it, and those who want free and specific rights, freedoms, autonomy, traditions, language, culture, and religion will have them. It would be enough to use DirectDemocracyS, and our pragmatic system, and our rules on property ownership for everyone living in every geographical area, and we would solve all the world's problems. Obviously, we are simplifying, and for each concept expressed, we have a wealth of information and details. At the end of this article, we will provide some links to our solutions, which are always partial, but for our members, we also have articles with all the necessary details. From the way we've explained things in this informative article, you'll have understood our enormous potential. Imagine what you'll say after putting the various "pieces" together—that is, reading all the other articles. Having a comprehensive overview, you'll have to admit: these crazy people are brilliant, and when implemented correctly, DirectDemocracyS works perfectly.

Much of the world's violence is driven by economic and financial motives. History teaches us that, to avoid having to admit that we seek power and wealth, we humans invent all sorts of things to justify our cruelty, such as inventing religious motives (certainly doing a disservice to the Gods and true believers), motives related to traditions, cultures, languages, racial differences, population differences, and political motives. If there are no motives, they are invented, provocations are created, sometimes even attacks, just to trigger reactions, which then erupt into spirals of violence that are very difficult, but not impossible for us, to stop. But we will discuss this at the right time, in detail, with concrete, credible, and perfectly functional alternative solutions—ours.

Here's the link to our article on our pragmatism (what's important is that all people live well):

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/fundamental-questions/explanations/we-are-pragmatic

Here is the link to an article that explains what property is for DirectDemocracyS and who it belongs to (connect it to autonomy and international law):

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/fundamental-questions/explanations/the-ownership

and many other articles, with our concrete solutions to all the world's conflicts (Palestine, Ukraine, and many others). Just search and study.