Plan for the Russian invasion of Ukraine

We have always told you that there are various ways of doing politics, but generally, soon only two will remain: the old, failed, unjust, unequal one, which we will call traditional, and DirectDemocracyS.

But why are we special, different, and certainly better?

Because we were designed from the very beginning to serve the interests of everyone, not just a few leaders, a few lobbies, and a few groups of people. Simply put, we repeat, we are the only concrete and effective hope for changing and improving the world.

We're repetitive, and often very detailed, because not everyone reads everything we publish, and it often takes a 360-degree view to understand our rules, our methodologies, our instructions, and above all, our motivations. Even our direct, uncompromising approach to communication is often misinterpreted.

We are the only consistent system, from the first word, of the first sentence written publicly, we have not lied, nor even said banal things, we prefer to talk about things documented by reliable sources, and always verified.

Our positions are always clearly explained, without any possibility of interpretation. This is because we are different from all other political forces, which want to appear good, kind, and just. To appear so, they don't hesitate to lie to you, manipulate you, deceive you, bribe you with gifts, bonuses, and excessive spending, without ever definitively solving real problems, and exploit your divisions.

Those who join DirectDemocracyS recognize these things and want to be the protagonist of their own destiny, directly and concretely.

After this long introduction, we want to talk again about Russia's vile invasion of Ukraine.

We have always done so using logic, common sense, truth, pragmatism, and mutual respect for all people, even long before Russia's actual large-scale invasion of Ukraine. Even before the abusive occupation of Crimea in 2014, which everyone watched helplessly and without much pressure on Russian policymakers, our initial groups, a few dozen people (including Russians and Ukrainians), expressed their positions.

Ukraine has made very serious mistakes in its recent history, first and foremost trusting others.

Before the Budapest Memorandum, it had over 1,900 nuclear warheads, and history shows that even with a few dozen, no one would ever dream of invading a nuclear-armed nation. They are an excellent deterrent, even if they are dangerous.

They trusted Russian policy by giving them their own nuclear arsenal.

They trusted the United States and the United Kingdom as guarantors of their freedom, independence, and territorial sovereignty, promised by Russia.

It is not difficult to find excuses, to cause accidents, to be able to renege on one's promises .

All it takes is a series of manipulative activities, and a great deal of cruelty, to trigger a spiral of mutual accusations, retaliation, and often violence, which becomes uncontrollable and “justifies” practically everything.

We have always recognized Ukraine's policies and decisions as wrong: rampant corruption, discrimination against minorities, and the Russian Orthodox Church.

But none of this justifies one country invading another. Not even the West's indifference to Russia's many warnings. Not even the practically silent inaction of Russia's occupation of Crimea.

We have always characterized Russian policy, under President Putin, as it truly and undeniably is: a criminal, oligarchic dictatorship, in which Putin's "friends" manage all of Russia's wealth, with virtually no merit other than loyalty to their master. We have characterized President Putin as a liar, unreliable, ill-advised, and insecure. His policies have always been ineffective, partly because his advisors are incompetent and often arrogant. If current Russian policy tells us that "milk is white," we monitor it, because anyone who lies to us even once is a fool to us. Anyone who tries to deceive us even once is a cheat to us. Anyone who steals from us even once is a thief to us. Anyone who says one thing and then does another, anyone who doesn't follow all the rules, is untrustworthy in our eyes. Anyone who has a plan and doesn't fully stick to it, and even anyone who promises one thing and doesn't keep it, is ethically and morally reprehensible.

Obviously, reading the previous few sentences, there will be people, even those not paid by Putin and his accomplices, who will say: what about the United States, the wealthy West, and the countries that call themselves free and democratic? For every person with at least two functioning neurons, the imperfect and often unjust West is certainly and clearly better than countries where, if something doesn't suit you, you have to endure it in silence, without the freedom to express yourself and protest. So, if for a few stupid, and certainly corrupt, people, the alternative to the United States, Europe, Israel, Ukraine, and other partially free and falsely democratic countries is the corrupt and soon-to-fail Chinese Communist Party (a single party, a single way of thinking, without opposition, without rights, and without even communism), the vile, cruel, and unjust Russian oligarchic dictatorship, or other (often military) dictatorships around the world, we, and anyone with a shred of logic and common sense, choose the imperfect West. We repeat it often, but there are still those who don't understand why we are so clear-cut in our positions. We simply don't make deals with those who deny freedom and democracy to their people.

Let it be clear to everyone, even if we consider anyone who prefers certain evil to partial good to be stupid and ignorant—because they undeniably are—we respect everyone's choice to side with the strongest, the bully, and the most powerful, even if it goes against logic, common sense , and mutual respect. If, on the other hand, it's a financial choice—that is, you're paid to "support and justify" the bad guys—we simply consider you corrupt.

If, on the other hand, you do it to gain political advantage, and to exploit the envy, social hatred, and in some cases the justified protests, of those who feel unheard and disrespected, you are simply squalid opportunists, liars, and manipulators.

Harsh words, which we will confirm everywhere, because freedom, truth, and democracy, for us, are non-negotiable, and cannot be partial, but authentic and complete.

Regarding the recent American "peace plan," we believe it is in line with President Putin's expectations and appropriate for President Trump, which rightly prompts many political analysts to ask: whose side are you on? Did anyone help you win the two presidential elections, or is it simply the stupidity and ignorance of many of your voters? Or is it the utter incompetence and total lack of backbone of almost the entire Democratic Party, which is incapable of creating credible alternatives? Giving away all of Donbas to the Russians, even areas not yet controlled by them, and halving their armed forces is inconceivable to anyone with logic and common sense. If those who swore to protect you attack you, even armed and partially aided by those who promised to do so, what will stop the Russians from doing so in the future, after this ill-fated agreement? They, the Russians, who always honor their commitments.

However, we agree with the freedom and respect for Russian culture, tradition, language, and religion, which Ukraine has never been able to respect.

The West has held Ukraine like a boxer with one hand tied behind his back. You can defend yourself, but sooner or later you'll lose the fight. We know that what we're saying may seem dangerous, reckless, and potentially causing deaths, injuries, destruction, and fear in Russia. But Russia itself has been causing death, injury, enormous damage, and fear in Ukraine on a daily basis for a long time. Perhaps a few more reactions from Ukraine could awaken the Russian people, who, when they decide to "clean up" their great country, do so very violently, but often with less than beneficial results.

Biden's "democratic" United States allowed the cowardly invasion; Obama's allowed the Russians to occupy Crimea in 2014. Terrible presidents with terrible decisions.

But President Trump is literally making all the few dead political representatives turn in their graves, with a little competence and above all reliability.

Among the many "disgusting" measures proposed in every one of his activities, and unfortunately often put into practice, by President Trump: blackmailing Ukraine, saying "Give me rare earths, and maybe I'll help you," or "I'll sell you weapons if you pay me, or if Europe pays, and whoever helps you," or "Give up your country's territories, and you'll have peace," and the latter, which we've analyzed in this article. Not to mention the enormous blunders of all kinds, and an incredible lapse in style: wanting to be considered a peacemaker, while behaving like a capricious child.

In practice, it's easy to tell anyone: give away territory, but would they do so if it were their own country being invaded and bombed daily, for so many years? Those who say: Ukraine should give away parts of its country to Russia for peace, tell us where they live: we'll send someone to claim and forcefully reclaim one or two rooms in their house, first with good manners, and then, if necessary, by force. Obviously, we were joking for once; we would never take anyone's property, because we are not like them.

A bit like those who refuse to help Ukraine: if we were to take their rooms by force, would they be happy not to receive help, not even from those who should be providing it, according to international agreements? Again, it was just an example. We don't take anyone's rooms, not even the stupid, ignorant, corrupt ones, who can't distinguish good from evil, right from wrong, and the rest of world politics, from DirectDemocracyS.

We are against guns, against violence, but often we have to defend ourselves from bullies and criminals, and with a little flower in our hands, we defend nothing. Being against guns in Europe means handing the world over to murderous criminals, because no superpower will give up guns and its armed forces just because a Europe subservient to stupid political forces, like those who "root" for the bad guys, or other incompetent and incompetent political forces, might. But we've discussed this in other articles, and for once, we won't repeat ourselves. If you want to talk about guns, read this informative article at this link:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/rules/justifications/official-positions/political-positions/weapons