Politically incorrect

Political organization is an integral and fundamental part of the DirectDemocracyS system. It's our gateway, both our entry and exit point, allowing us to best welcome and, if necessary, expel anyone who doesn't follow all our rules.

Today we will clarify some very important concepts for understanding DirectDemocracyS. Perhaps it would have been appropriate for this informative article to be among the first we published, so that all the others could be better understood.

Are we politically incorrect?

We are many things, but we certainly don't like the labels with which society, systems, and all people often superficially define everything.

We didn't offend anyone.

In all our informative articles, and in everything we've made public, we've never offended individuals, systems, lobbies, or groups. We've always simply stated the facts, documented by reliable sources, continually tested and verified. We've analyzed the facts, and if they were deemed wrong, unjust, unfair, violent, or despicable, we've reported them, criticized them, and always offered our alternatives. If the truth is uncomfortable for some, that's their problem, and we don't feel obligated to "sugar-coated" them.

A free and direct way of expressing ourselves.

Tired of politicians who say too much without delivering anything concrete. We're for concreteness, not correct expression, so if you like, you can consider us politically incorrect.

Let's talk about every topic.

We don't speak to the public with electoral slogans, but we talk about everything, even uncomfortable topics, without any fear of being judged too sincere.

What we say does not have various interpretations, but only one.

When we say something, we're so clear, detailed, and even repetitive that there's no way to interpret what we say except the correct one. We've always wanted all other systems to speak this way, so we could truly understand what they meant.

Are we too presumptuous, vain, and sure of our truths?

We are simply realists and proud of our work. Our truths, others' truths, and everyone's truths don't exist. There is usually only one truth; reality is usually verifiable, with all its interpretations and various opinions. A real, undeniable fact, if presented in scant detail, or by eliminating parts that might not be acceptable, is often distorted to suit one's own interests by old and failing traditional systems and their respective political forces. At DirectDemocracyS, facts and truths are not distorted to suit our interests; besides, our only interest is the common good of the entire population of the earth, without any preference. One thing that makes us very useful to the community is that for every fact and every topic, we calculate in detail the probability of its being real and true, and we always choose the one that can best serve the good and interests of the entire world's population, and not just ourselves and our system. Many people who often criticize us do not have access to our specialists, who are all our official members, with declared, demonstrated, verified, and continuously tested skills, who therefore have a vested interest in being useful to our system, which is also theirs.

We trust our members, and it is a mutual trust, both individually and as a group.

Each person who joins us has specific skills, strengths, and individual qualities. Everyone has their own potential, and DirectDemocracyS puts the right people in the right places and creates numerous groups where they can express their qualities. This method guarantees us unity in diversity, competence, and mutual trust. Each person and each group complements the knowledge and needs of every other person or group within us, resulting in a professional system that is competent in every issue. The benefits are enormous for everyone because you don't have to research everything; you simply rely on the teams of specialists, based on your own needs and the needs of the various groups.

What many people confuse with presumption and vanity is the awareness that what we disclose publicly is only the truth, and no one can deny our skills and our professionalism.

Let's explain better why it is very important to understand a fundamental concept.

DirectDemocracyS has no leader, no governing body, no small group of decision-makers, but rather all those with verified and guaranteed identities make up our truly and fully shared leadership. Through their informed and competent vote, supported by our teams of specialists, each of our registered users with verified and guaranteed identities freely and fully expresses their will and their individual leadership, which integrates into the shared leadership.

We weren't content to simply make DirectDemocracy fair, equitable, safe, secure, competent, and professional. We went beyond grassroots democracy, making our entire system, our entire political organization, all our platforms, and all our activities collectively owned by all our official members. Many people don't immediately understand how important this is, and how many problems can be effectively and intelligently prevented, simply through shared leadership and ownership rights. You'll need to read our informative articles about these fundamental rules to understand the brilliance of our system.

We often tell you that to understand our mechanism, and how intelligent it is, you should be part of it and access our reserved and protected areas.

Let's simplify with a very interesting example. If a political representative from any other political force says something in any interview, they certainly don't have our teams of specialists, who, along with their staff—a potentially infinite group of people who directly help, manage, and monitor them—offer them continuous, direct, and comprehensive support. If one of our political representatives tells you something, even the most banal, you can trust them, because they're not saying it without having the right information, but have the ongoing, professional support of those truly competent in each topic. Now, let's extend this concept to our entire system, knowing that not only can you trust them, but you can count on the same support, whether you're our official members, our official representatives, or our politicians.

These groups of specialists don't impose anything; they provide comprehensive information, offering all possible alternatives, and explaining in detail the consequences of each possible choice. Our experts allow themselves to suggest the best option, but the vote of our leadership and our owners is free, democratic, and binding on all, even according to our unique and inimitable voting rules. This expertise, without any possibility of error, makes our system infallible and brings it closer to perfection. For these reasons, some consider us vain and presumptuous, but that's just the reality. We know that if we've all decided together to do anything, in any way, behind every decision we make, there's a tremendous amount of work by many groups, all involved, to decide what's best for the common good.

We don't spend all our days voting; there are various stages, and varying degrees of importance.

The voting rules may seem overly complicated, but they're actually very simple. Different degrees of importance are assigned to the various decisions to be made, ranging from fundamental rules and decisions (which require unanimity to change), to very important decisions, which require quorums between 75% and 95%, major decisions with a quorum of 66% to 75%, decisions of medium importance for which 50% + 1 vote is sufficient, and finally, there are implementing rules where the decisions of specific groups are sufficient, with the authorization of our five special groups. Even in these cases, each of our official members can participate in all five special groups, all the various voting groups, and also in all our groups where proposals are made, discussed, chosen, tested, voted on, and all the various activities are implemented. Our system is not a secret sect, or a closed, exclusive system. In fact, anyone can join us, and if they meet all the requirements, they can be part of our shared leadership. And if they wish and meet the requirements, they can become part of our collective ownership, becoming one of the owners of our system. It is not a static system, but one that is constantly being updated, improved, and evolved. Everyone can and must contribute to improving our system.

Our votes are all open, there is no need to be ashamed of our opinions and preferences (no one is expelled for what they prefer, choose, or think), fully motivated (explaining publicly to everyone the reasons for our preference), and above all we assume full responsibility for what we vote for, and for all the consequences of our decisions.

Even these rules leave many unconvinced that they're fair, equitable, and, above all, respectful of individual rights, such as privacy and the right to conceal one's preferences. But we ask you: what's the first thing you do to vote? The first thing is to identify yourself. At DirectDemocracyS, you can't vote unless you have a blue check mark next to your username in the social area of our websites and platforms, which guarantees that the person with the blue check mark has been identified. This isn't an invasion of privacy; it's a simple formality, which allows us to prevent many potential problems. This way, we avoid fake profiles, multiple profiles, and prevent multiple votes for a single person. Open voting and the reasoning behind your vote force us to explain our point of view, and this is very important because it benefits everyone, especially since there's no such thing as a "crime" of opinion in our system. Open voting is essential to allow everyone who votes to verify that their vote has been properly counted, exactly as individually decided. In our voting groups, only members of their respective groups see how their members voted, their reasons, and their comments. Each voting group elects a single elector, and the votes of all electors are counted, including across different user types, according to very detailed voting rules. We are perhaps the only ones in the world who assume full responsibility, both individually and as a group—and therefore collectively—for everything we decide, and for all the consequences of all our decisions. It would be a beautiful, and certainly better, world if, in this voting method, everyone copied us and took responsibility for their actions, instead of arguing and accusing each other.

We are not interested in everyone's approval immediately, but at the right time everyone will realize our enormous potential.

While everyone else declares and promises everything, often failing to keep every promise, or giving away public money to "buy" votes just to gain consensus and win elections, we are interested in always telling the truth and taking full responsibility for all our voters. No one accepts this method, because no one wants to share power with their supporters, but prefers to keep it for themselves.

In this too, DirectDemocracyS is unique and inimitable, but above all, it is not selfish. Instead, it will share any power it gains, always and completely, with all its voters, before, during, and, for the first time in the world, even after the elections. All this is brilliant, and it is the best, fairest, most just, and safest choice for changing and improving the world, all together.