Translate

    Welcome to the DirectDemocracyS system. To view all the public areas of our website, simply scroll down a little.

    Breadcrumbs is yous position in the site

    We make no compromises

    2 or 3 ways of doing politics

    Politics is often defined as the art of compromise (and of the possible), essential for mediating between opposing interests, managing complexity, and reaching agreements in situations of disagreement, rather than pursuing ideological purity. It is a fundamental practice for good governance and diplomacy, also referred to as the science of opportunism. DirectDemocracyS often overturns traditions, in many cases employs new concepts, conducts activities with pioneering methodologies, and is obviously innovative and an alternative to all old and failing traditional systems.

    We don't make any kind of compromise with anyone, for any reason, not out of presumption, but simply because we have people of all ideologies within us, who carry out a wide range of activities, and who decide everything completely freely and democratically, so the only compromises we make are with ourselves.

    This doesn't mean we don't communicate, collaborate, recognize, or engage in activities with others. We're always open to everyone, but according to our own rules, while always respecting all laws and regulations, at all levels.

    But if the rules are not made for the good of the entire population, all these laws will be analyzed, changed, and improved, together with all those who join us, for the good of all, whether they are inside or outside our system.

    Our fundamental rule is that we will never join coalitions, nor make agreements or alliances with any political force, for any reason, anywhere in the world. If we win alone, we will govern and make laws together with anyone who joins us, according to all our rules, methodologies, instructions, and motivations. If we lose the elections, we will be a healthy, loyal, honest, and useful opposition, voting for whatever our voters consider right and offering our solutions to strengthen the common good. If, however, what the winners do and decide is judged negatively by our voters, we will vote against them, offering our alternatives.

    Great strategic and political advantage.

    Anyone who joins us knows that we have no political preferences. However, we have our own ideology, which takes all the tiny positive aspects of all the old political forces, adding our own ideologies and eliminating every negative aspect of all the others, to create a politically perfect ideal, always centered on the common good. We have our own unique and inimitable programs to change and improve the world and the lives of every person, and we repeat: whether or not it's in our system. This method guarantees us complete freedom, authentic democracy, self-financing (so we don't depend on anyone), neutrality, independence, and resilience. Therefore, we look at concrete facts, truth, and reality, and not at who proposes something or which political force they belong to. If something is considered good, we will give it a positive evaluation; otherwise, we will remain consistent with our ideas and our projects.

    Great mental advantage , no manipulation, correct information, and helpful tips.

    Anyone who joins DirectDemocracyS changes and improves their mindset, practically automatically, as there is no manipulation whatsoever in our system, but rather accurate and precise information from numerous groups of specialists (all our official members, based on their expertise). As our collective owners, they have every interest in correctly informing all our users and all our groups, so they can make competent and informed decisions—complete, neutral, reliable, incorruptible, and sincere, and therefore beneficial to the common good. No one has the right or pretension to try to change the minds of anyone who joins us, no one teaches anyone anything. We simply provide accurate information, always verifying all our sources, truly leaving people free to choose, but also to assume full responsibility for all the consequences of our decisions. Our vote must always be open, reasoned, and, as we have always said, involving collective and individual responsibility.

    Let it be clear to everyone: this assumption of responsibility is not used against anyone, to punish those who make mistakes, but we are the only system that, if they make mistakes, will not only try to correct them, but we ourselves will make them public, assuming full responsibility.

    No propaganda.

    We don't say, write, or show things to make ourselves look better or more correct, and above all, we're not interested in convincing anyone to join us. The choice to register and become part of our system must first be informed, and then it must be a well-calculated and individual choice, even though lately many groups of people, and even entire traditional political forces, have wanted to join us. Everything is possible only if you accept all our rules, which are always respected by everyone who joins us. We often hear people say: "You're presumptuous and you're boasting about your system!" We're simply aware of what we've created from nothing, and we're very proud of our long, hard, and very complex work, which is not individual, but collective, of everyone who has joined us. Everyone has contributed their ideas, their projects, their proposals, in addition to annual fees to self-finance us (though there are free profiles), but also by carrying out activities we don't like, but are necessary, to keep our immense mechanism functioning perfectly.

    20 minutes a day, or alternatively at least 120 minutes a week.

    There are certain types of superior users, who therefore have greater potential, who, in exchange for valuable points (which offer many advantages), perform extremely important activities for our entire system. We want to explain something that not everyone knows, unless they are already our users. Those who must carry out voluntary activities (but mandatory for superior user types), must not only do the activities they enjoy, but must also enjoy them, and perform as best as possible the activities mutually agreed upon within the group for the activities to be carried out. In practice, you must do the things you don't like within the mandatory time limit, just to make our system work. Don't be afraid! We won't send you out to break rocks, and we won't make you do overly strenuous activities, nothing illegal, and no risky activities. Instead, for a mandatory time limit, you must do activities that are useful for the common good, therefore dedicating yourself to others. Then, for the rest of the day, you can do the things you enjoy most. We don't ask you for great sacrifices, but a minimum of altruism for the good of our system, and to make everything work like a Swiss watch.

    Some people tell us that we have too strict rules.

    They aren't strict; they're simply very detailed, and they must be respected by everyone at all times, without exception or compromise. Without detailed rules, optimal results aren't achieved, and if the rules weren't respected by everyone, we wouldn't be any better or different from the old, failing traditional systems.

    Others find our system too complicated, but for those who really think so, we have a dedicated article, which explains why DirectDemocracyS, at first, may seem like a complex system, and difficult to understand, read this:

    https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/info/fundamental-questions/explanations/complicated-situation

    We can assure you that everything we've decided to do in a certain way has been decided in great detail, evaluating all possible alternatives and choosing the best solution, the one that received the most votes based on our rules.

    Nothing is left to chance.

    A self-respecting system must first pay attention to every tiny detail, every rule must resolve specific situations, through our best weapon: prevention.

    But does DirectDemocracyS really work?

    Based on theory and our forecasts, taking into account all the variables, and our ongoing simulations, our system works perfectly, and there is no risk of boycotts, slowdowns, or failures. Of course, there may be very small and insignificant problems of various kinds, mostly due to people joining us with bad intentions, or believing they can behave like the old systems. But by design, we have designed a different and better system, one that takes care of itself, continuously evolving and improving, and solving every possible problem on its own, or with the help of groups and users.

    The classic question is: can I trust it? The second classic question is: is it as beautiful inside as it looks from the outside?

    trust must be continuous and mutual, based on their understanding of our system. We have never betrayed anyone's trust, and there are no negative reviews about us. If there are any, before condemning us, ask for our explanations and our motivations, and don't rely solely on the lies they might tell about us. If our system is as beautiful on the inside as it appears from the outside, we can assure you that every word, every single sentence spoken, written, or publicly displayed, is applied internally, exactly as it is seen and expected from the outside. Therefore, we are exactly like that, even if many people tell us that from the outside we appear more rigid and complicated than we are on the inside.

    We don't ask for your trust without verification, but we offer you the opportunity to try, and convince yourself, whether it's worth joining us, and then whether it's worth staying.

    If it helps, we can tell you that the people who have abandoned us over the years are very few, those who are inactive are a few hundred, while those expelled for various reasons are several dozen.


    Add comment

    Before submitting the comment, you agree that:

    a. To accept full responsibility for the comment that you submit.
    b. To use this function only for lawful purposes.
    c. Not to post defamatory, abusive, offensive, racist, sexist, threatening, vulgar, obscene, hateful or otherwise inappropriate comments, or to post comments which will constitute a criminal offense or give rise to civil liability.
    d. Not to post or make available any material which is protected by copyright, trade mark or other proprietary right without the express permission of the owner of the copyright, trade mark or any other proprietary right.
    e. To evaluate for yourself the accuracy of any opinion, advice or other content.

    Security code Refresh

    Submit

    Donation PayPal in USD

    Donation PayPal in EURO

    Blog - Categories Module

    Chat Module

    Best political force

    What is the best political force in human history?

    Offcanvas menu