Webportal

Logic, common sense, truth, study, expertise, and mutual respect are the foundation of DirectDemocracyS's official positions. Our values are always authentic democracy and all potentially unlimited freedoms, both individual and group, but which end where the freedoms of another individual or group begin. Everything is managed by anyone who joins us, consistently and securely.

Many people ask us, in various messages, for our official position on literally everything, but to always know our position on any topic, it would be enough to put into practice all the words in the previous sentences and read carefully and thoroughly everything we've published. All with an open mind, and without making hasty, superficial judgments.

They ask us for an opinion on women, because in their opinion, we have written nothing on the subject, and on equal rights for the two sexes.

We treat women and men, and all other various categories, exactly the same. We do not discriminate against anyone and we do not favor anyone. Obviously, with approximately 65% women, their presence in all our activities is a majority, but we have women too intelligent to vote only for female candidates. The selection of the best people is based on equality and meritocracy, guaranteed to all, always together, consistently over time. The very fact of not forcing a certain number of women and men to apply for certain roles, but always rewarding the best, regardless of gender, is the best way to respect the abilities of all women. It would be an insult and a grave mistake to promote these inequalities. Almost always, our candidates, for all available roles, internal and external, reflect the percentages of approximately 65%. In many countries, there are rules for gender equality, which we intend to respect, because rules and laws, whether internal or external, must always be respected. Therefore, where it is mandatory to nominate a man and a woman, we will do so, assigning important internal roles to the 15% who unfortunately we will not be able to nominate externally.

Defending the “weaker” sex.

As victims, however, we will have no mercy for those who disobey them, and we will do everything possible, not only to punish the perpetrators severely, but above all to prevent all forms of violence, whether against women, minors, the elderly, and even, in some cases, men. Defending and siding with the most vulnerable, and with the victims, is not a matter of political opportunism, but of justice and common sense, as well as the most logical.

The best form of prevention is a culture of mutual respect, and the transformation and improvement of all toxic mindsets. It will take more time, but the results will never be more effective and long-lasting than even the most useful punitive measures.

They tell us we're not decisive enough in our official positions on foreign policy. That we side with everyone, without ever clearly siding with one side.

We're sure that whoever wrote the previous sentence doesn't know us adequately and completely. In everything we write, there's no room for interpretation; we have a clear, direct, and disinterested communication style. In order to always be on the side of the victims, and never the perpetrators, without having any preferences, we prefer to lose the votes of those who would have us on one side only. We're not on the side of the bullies, but of those who are bullied.

In all the many wars, we stand with all peoples, and no government. If we must, politically, without discriminating against our respective peoples, prefer ourselves and anyone who joins us, we prefer partially free and falsely democratic countries to all the various forms of dictatorship, oligarchies, and single-party politics. Those who do not allow a plurality of ideas and competition are destined to implode upon themselves sooner or later, and also do not allow for healthy, sustainable economic and financial growth that benefits all. Anyone who supports these regimes can join us, but they will not have important roles, because they do not recognize the values of authentic democracy and potentially infinite freedom that are mandatory in our system.

In our official positions as well as in our solutions to various problems, we always propose radical, unusual (sometimes pioneering) solutions, which, if applied by us exactly as proposed, are destined to change and improve everyone's lives, forever eliminating various social problems and all spirals of violence.

We wrote: if we apply them exactly as proposed, they will work. Obviously, it takes all the time necessary, and therefore, hard and long work, at every level, to see concrete results. No one could implement our solutions perfectly, for several reasons: the main reason is because they lack our official, competent, and reliable members; the second reason is because they lack our courage to make choices in the best interest and for the good of the entire world's population, and not just a few lobbies and rich, powerful, and famous individuals. To side with good people also requires a healthy dose of "madness," and in this case, as in all others, we are more gifted than anyone else. Whoever created such a complete, fair, just, and secure system from scratch surely did so with the help of outstanding specialists—free, independent, and neutral experts—who, often anonymously, do not hesitate to offer the best of their skills, putting them at the service of the community.

We conduct politics and business together, equally, putting everyone who joins us at the center and making them protagonists. We do not negotiate, form coalitions, compromise, or agree with anyone outside of us, for the simple reason that, from the very beginning, we already have within us people with every conceivable ideal, who, however, have decided, for the first time in history, to unite, and not, as other systems do, to divide on everything. We have taken the very few good ideas from the past and from other political forces, completely and definitively eliminating the countless misconceptions, and correcting all possible errors that have negatively impacted the lives of so many people. Therefore, we are not afraid to take sides, and we can say we are not ashamed of what we say and what we believe. Since this is a project to unite, not divide, we are not indebted to anyone, of any kind, and we do not have to stand where it suits us, but where it is right for us to stand. Not everyone can do the same, and we sincerely pity those who accept anything, even against their principles, just for fear of being excluded or discriminated against.

Instead, ask us: how many people have been kicked out of DirectDemocracyS for their beliefs? The answer is simple: no one was kicked out for their beliefs. The few hundred people we kicked out, and in many cases declared persona non grata, in our system were untrustworthy and did not respect all our shared rules, the jointly agreed-upon methodologies, and all the instructions we collectively created. Respect for one's own decisions and the interests of good people is essential for anyone who joins us.

The coherence of every word we write, in every single sentence, connects and integrates perfectly with everything we say, write, or do together. There are not and never will be any clever people who can gain advantages and advantages that we don't fully deserve, and this attitude of ours may, at first glance, frighten some, but time, as always, will prove us right.

Don't waste your time trying to judge us, because you'll only make a bad impression. We don't have a single leader, or a few small groups of people, who make decisions, and the base implements every decision made by the top of the pyramid. While we respect and implement the various traditional hierarchies, at the same time, and for the first and only time in the world, we reverse roles. The base decides, manages, and controls, and the top implements every decision, in the time and manner agreed upon.

So, for those who want to criticize, without knowing us, it's not a system of a few who command and many who execute, but a unique and inimitable system, in which everyone decides, and everyone holds power. Our "presumption and vanity" is based only on the undeniable truth: we can be proud of our long and hard work, and the few who criticize us have no valid reason to do so, other than envy and superficiality.

Everyone would have liked to create all this, but no one has the collective capacity. In literally every professional and academic field, we have some of the best in the world; so, it's logical that the project we've created is very close to perfection.

Anyone can say: I would have done a better job, but no one can ever prove to us that their individual ideas are better than our collective capabilities; therefore, if we have decided in a certain way, you can be sure that we have very valid reasons that convinced us to implement certain activities in certain ways.

Furthermore, if someone has ideas to integrate and improve our system, instead of criticizing us from the outside, join us and implement their own ideas and projects with us. Each of our rules, methodologies, instructions, and activities begins with an idea or an individual project, developed and implemented in groups, and if deemed useful, becomes an integral part of our system, without ever disrupting previous rules and activities.

Thus, with everyone's anonymity guaranteed, any official member, unknown to anyone, can develop brilliant ideas and projects for their own benefit and that of everyone else. This unique methodology truly allows anyone to be the true protagonist and pursue their own ideas, without ever being judged or evaluated by anyone. No one dares to impede the free expression of another official member's potential, because each of us possesses a unique, non-cumulative, and non-transferable individual action that makes us, along with all our official members, the owner of our entire system. Therefore, no one is superior, and no one is inferior, while always rewarding merit, including the accumulated points, of each of our users and the groups they belong to, from the moment they join us. Competence and the appropriate professional qualifications, and not just brilliance, are mandatory in our specialist groups, where passion alone isn't enough; only documented, demonstrated, and fully verified expertise is required.

Our style is truly inimitable.

The test profile is very useful in our system for several reasons.

The first reason is to have people outside of DirectDemocracyS directly test some of our capabilities and then decide together whether the user who owns the test profile will invite the person who temporarily used the test profile to join us with a higher user type or a lower user type.

The second reason is to allow those with a test profile to provide assistance to those outside our system, earning important points.

The third reason is to allow us, through very detailed procedures, to invite compatible, reliable, and competent people to join us, being able to complete all the various formalities and identity verification, with the collaboration of our special security group, directly on our platforms.

Let's briefly explain what test profiles are, who can create them, how they can be created, how many can be created, who can be assigned externally, how long they can be used, who is responsible for the activities and behaviors of the various test users, how all activities are deleted from one test user to the next, and some short rules.

Test profiles are a type of profile in DirectDemocracyS in which an internal user of a higher level invites a person from outside our system to our platforms to directly test some features of our various activities in our reserved areas.

In short, the test user will learn about and try out some activities, receive more detailed information, and receive real, dedicated support—a preventive measure, therefore, very useful, especially for those who want to join us.

Test profiles can be created directly by any of our higher-level users by completing a request directly via a dedicated form after logging in to our website. After obtaining authorization from the test user authorization group, the user will create their own personal test profile. The profile must have a username that begins with the word "test" (only the English translation is used) and immediately after it contains the personal identification number of the person creating it. For example: test282.

For those authorized to create multiple test profiles, a - sign will be added to indicate the number, in chronological and consecutive numerical order. For example: test282-1 for the first, test282-2 for the second, and so on.

Each registered user, with verified and guaranteed identity, will be able to create only one test user.

Each official member, and other user types above the official member, will be able to create a maximum of 5 test users each.

Administrators and super administrators, internationally, will be able to create a maximum of 25 test users each.

These numbers may be modified, based on our decisions, and based on our needs.

Test users created by each user have an unlimited duration, but can be deactivated, blocked, or deleted based on the decisions of the individual user who created them, or for disciplinary reasons. They will do so by communicating the deactivation, blocking, deletion, or assignment of their test profiles to the test user groups.

To allow access to your test user, created with an initial password of at least 12 characters (numbers, uppercase and lowercase letters, and special characters), the owner user will log in with their initial credentials and change the access password by entering the new password twice in the respective fields at this link (valid only after logging into your test profile, with the initial username and password of your test user):

https://free.directdemocracys.org/social/profile/edit

and entering a completely different password, always at least 12 characters long, with the same password rules.

After saving the change (saving the new password in a safe place) and checking again to ensure there is no personal data that could identify anyone who may have previously used their test profile, the owner of their test profile will exit the website and will no longer use the test user until the external person has finished using it.

All they need to do is provide the username and password to the new test user, who will be able to log in immediately using the credentials they received.

We always recommend that every test user change their password after their first login at this link:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/social/profile/edit

Enter your own password in the two spaces reserved for passwords (one of which requires confirmation to ensure it is identical). Store your password in a safe place, following the same rules as above, and save the change. This way, no one will be able to access the test profile during the period in which it is used. The only requirement is to communicate your password 24 hours before the agreed-upon end to the test profile owner, so they can change their password, either by restoring the old one or by creating a new one if they intend to allow someone else to use their test account, in accordance with our rules.

To choose strong passwords, you can use our free, secure password generator at this link:

https://tools.directdemocracys.org/tools/password-generator

Just remember to change the number of characters from the default, which is 8, to the mandatory one on our platforms, which is at least 12 characters, but can contain more. We recommend using no more than 36 characters for passwords, even in personal profiles, because two-factor authentication is required, which makes your profile secure and inaccessible to other people.

Test users can enable two-factor authentication, but must remove it after using the test profile to allow the legitimate owner to access it.

Each time a test user is assigned to an external person, the test user assignment group will be provided with the user's real first and last name, exact date of birth, accurate and verified email address, accurate and verified phone number, and exact address, or at least the primary country and exact geographic area of habitual residence. We recommend a maximum usage period of about a month, although one or two weeks may suffice. The decision is up to the individual user, in conjunction with the external person.

One week before the agreed-upon deadline, the owner user will notify the person using their test profile of their intention to assign their test profile to someone outside of DirectDemocracyS.

One day before the agreed deadline, the test user will be able to directly and personally delete all of their activities, carried out using this test profile, which they believe may contain personal data or which may be traceable to their identity.

Private chats and messages from each test user will be automatically deleted at least 4 hours before the established deadline, and the test user will be able to verify in person that these messages (chats and internal emails) have actually been permanently deleted.

After each use, the owner of the test profile will log in to their test profile and change, according to our rules, the test profile's access password, after eliminating any activity that could be traced back to the identity of the person who used it.

If the test user has changed their password, and the owner user can no longer log in, they can change it again (after deleting all sensitive data) by contacting our test user management team and requesting a password change, allowing them to log in, deleting sensitive data, and either reassigning their test user to someone else or keeping it inactive.

Test users, according to the detailed implementation rules, must be created using your invitation link in our social media area, at this link (valid after logging in with your personal profile, username, and password):

https://free.directdemocracys.org/social/friends/invite

This way, each test user will be automatically connected to the personal profile of the person who created it.

Responsibility for each test user's activity and behavior lies with the person who created it, and only secondarily with the person using it. Any punishments will always be applied to both, based on our detailed implementation rules.

Test users must always follow all rules, methodologies, and instructions they receive from the person who invited them.

They will also have to comply with everything provided for in this informational article:

https://www.directdemocracys.org/law/instructions/for-users/new-users/what-you-should-never-do

As they do not have a personal profile, they are not part of our shared leadership, and their votes are therefore not binding on our activities.

The total number of our users with a test profile will not be counted in the various quorums to be reached for our votes, at any level (international, continental, national, and local), in any of our phases.

Since they are not our official members, they will not have access to our special groups, specialists, numerical, and of all types, other than the test type.

Test profiles will not receive a single share, which is individual, non-cumulative, and non-transferable. Therefore, since they are not our official members, they will not, all together, own our entire system.

They may be invited to participate in certain invisible groups and private pages, and carry out certain activities, as long as they are completely invisible to non-members.

The points accumulated by each test user cannot be transferred to the personal profile that created it, nor to any personal profile that may be created by the person who used it.

Test users will only have the free user type, and will be able to carry out their activities only and exclusively on the free website, at this link:

https://free.directdemocracys.org/

with access to reserved areas dedicated to this type of user.

The activities they will be able to carry out are numerous, as specified in the detailed implementing rules.

We recommend creating test users only to those with good experience in our various activities.

The DirectDemocracyS system is composed of a political organization and a comprehensive system. Although we have the same fundamental rules and operate on the same platforms, we maintain separate accounts. Our political decisions will not only benefit our own businesses, but the benefits of our laws will benefit the entire world.

Of course, there will be people who, unfamiliar with us, will create theories based on assumptions and invent conspiracies based on non-existent facts, and suffer all the consequences. If you want to discuss DirectDemocracyS, for better or for worse, try to study us thoroughly first, with an open mind, without hasty judgments, and based only on real facts that you can demonstrate with reliable sources. Avoid, if possible, repeating things you've heard around if you can't prove them. This way, you'll avoid making a bad impression and won't be considered ignorant, superficial, or a liar. You'll also avoid legal action, because in this respect, we're different from others. Since we don't make mistakes and have nothing to hide, we won't tolerate even a single falsehood or inaccuracy in describing ourselves and our system. We will use all legal means, and with great determination and intelligence, wherever necessary, to defend DirectDemocracyS.

The laws that will be decided by our political representatives, voted for, and elected in institutions, by our voters, will all be to change and improve the world, without any preference, and without favors for anyone.

Our political action is concerned with the common good, and you already know that part of our programs, at various levels, and on many important issues. You know, for example, that we always start by helping first, most, and for the longest time: those most in need, but also businesses, which have a chance of recovery, without wasting public money. We prefer new investments that work, and that create jobs and income, rather than trying to save commercial companies that are inexorably doomed to failure.

You also know that all our voters, if they are our users, with verified and guaranteed identity, make up our truly and completely shared leadership, and with their decisions (competent and informed by groups of specialists, composed of our official members), they manage and control all their political representatives, before, during, and for the first time in the world, even after the elections.

Even these first few sentences will raise some doubts for interested parties, and you're surely already asking: if voters do all the work, why are we spending money on political representatives? Wouldn't it be simpler, cheaper, and safer to decide everything on our platforms?

Let's answer these interesting questions immediately, briefly but clearly. First, we must create laws worldwide to allow our great innovation, as a completely alternative system, to prevail everywhere. Second, to change and improve the world, including through our political organization, requires time, patience, and a great deal of hard work from everyone who joins us. A better life can't be achieved by simply snapping your fingers . The first thing to do is radically change and improve the mindset based on old, traditional, and certainly failing systems. We have every reason to call them that, and in many of our articles, we demonstrate that they are. To confirm this, just look around you, and you'll see that the situation is certainly not good. Those who join us, the only thing they need to do is study us before registering, and then respect all our rules, all our methods, all our instructions, trying to understand even our every motivation. With these simple activities, they will surely change and improve their way of thinking. Not to change their minds, after all, they simply need to accept one thing: in DirectDemocracyS, no one, inside or outside of us, can use our system in an unethical or morally incorrect manner to gain personal advantages that are not fully deserved. We always talk about equality, always combined with meritocracy.

Simply put, in our system, thanks to its "morphology" and detailed design, there are none of the crafty people of all other systems who lie, manipulate, cheat, and make the lives of others unsafe and worse. In practice, the path to change, and real improvement, is not easy, and its implementation requires a great deal of effort, enormous sacrifices, and a great deal of time. We are aware of this, and anyone who joins us must be willing to do whatever it takes to achieve our shared goals.

While we all hope to be able to save and reinvest in important things the money wasted by traditional politics and the wasteful spending of various institutions, the moment when everything will be decided by all the people is still quite a long way off. Ordinary people, and all good people, already struggle to understand our enormous potential and our innovative alternatives to all other systems. Imagine if they had to vote to directly decide the various laws and single-handedly maintain all the important institutions at the local, national, continental, and global levels. They would be immediately manipulated and corrupted by the rich, powerful, and famous and by the various lobbies, exactly as happened before the creation of DirectDemocracyS, and as will happen with all those who don't join us, who will continue to let others decide for them, and will remain powerless to comply with rules that are certainly not made solely for their own good, but serve other masters.

The first thing you notice about DirectDemocracyS is its “excessive” complexity, and its impenetrable, and very detailed, security measures.

We didn't do this to mock those who might study our system, nor to complicate our lives, but simply to empower everyone to reason with their own, properly informed minds, neutrally, independently, based on reality, documented by reliable, continuously tested, and verified sources. In short, before giving anyone who joins us all the power that everyone else had taken away, or pretended to give, we had to make them aware of the enormous responsibilities that come with this regained power.

These security measures aren't just designed to protect ourselves, but to make everyone who joins us truly free and authentically democratic. These measures may seem excessive, but we can assure you they are necessary if we are to truly achieve our goals and make every promise we make come true.

Our entire system was designed to protect people, both internally and externally, from any form of manipulation, brainwashing, or the illusion of having any weight (while others are the ones making the decisions), and these measures must be maintained forever so that people are no longer fooled by anyone.

If it were enough to immediately give all power to everyone, without rules, methodologies, instructions, motivations, or exceptional security measures, it would all be immediate, very simple, but the results would be disastrous. Without DirectDemocracyS, without our activities, without all our details, without our rules, methodologies, instructions, and security measures (we will repeat this over and over again, even at the risk of becoming boring), those who make decisions now will continue to do so, exploiting every possible trick to enslave people to the old systems.

As we've said, not out of presumption, nor even to convince you, we are the only hope for all good people. With pioneering rules, we radically overturn all bad habits, creating a new system from scratch, one that always and only focuses on good people, the common good, and the interests of all, not just a few. Not only does shared leadership help us, but also the ownership of the entire DirectDemocracyS system by all our official members, making any potential misuse of our enormous potential impossible.

The choice between the various systems was varied, but almost all of them, before DirectDemocracyS, were and are complicit, and serve masters, in some cases hidden, in other cases, clearly visible.

With the birth of our system, however, the choice is between us or everyone else, and trust me, there will be very harsh, very cunning, and even very violent actions, verbally and physically, against those who join us. They will try in various ways to stop us, and no longer able to do so, they will at least try to slow us down. If they fail, they will try to boycott us, and we will know how to make them fail, even in this last attempt.

They will offer you gifts, bonuses, and will do everything to make you believe they have better alternatives to ours, inventing many fake systems, and with only illusory freedoms, but many people, weak or not intelligent enough, will trust those who have always exploited them.

We, however, will continue to carry out all our activities only with those who truly want to commit, directly and continuously, through their actual work, through various annual fees, donations, and support, with ideas and projects, to be realized all together.

At the right time the truth will come out, and everyone will understand which side is right.

For these reasons, we do everything with the utmost care, taking care of every single detail, carefully choosing each individual who joins us, especially in the delicate and crucial initial phases, when, all together, we must create extremely solid and impenetrable foundations for our system, to be able to welcome, at the right time, in the best possible way, all those who will join us.

DirectDemocracyS is a serious, fair, loyal, equitable, free, independent, and very secure system, in which one can truly be a protagonist, but as we have seen, we must do everything, without allowing ourselves any mistakes.

We know that continued growth is needed, but we can assure you that there's no need to rush, and for now, the political representation that DirectDemocracyS makes available to its voters is a way to begin to change, and concretely improve, the world we live in.

We will do this by choosing the best people to represent us in the institutions, in a dignified, reliable and loyal manner.

The best weapon to defend ourselves, and to counterattack, is our unfailing consistency, which, combined with the disruptive power of our ideas, will simplify all our activities.

Official members are a superior type of user, not because of their individual qualities, but because of their demonstrated reliability, or because of the trust that many of our users, of an even higher type, place in them.

This is not a form of discrimination, because anyone who has the requirements, skills, merits, and intentions can become our official member.

Everyone knows that all official members co-own our entire system, through an individual, non-cumulative, and non-transferable action. Therefore, all official members jointly own our entire system, all our platforms, all our activities. This isn't a superficial or symbolic ownership, but a concrete, real, physical, demonstrable, and secure one.

But why make this type of user proprietary?

Because the highest levels of user experience begin with all our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities, who together constitute our truly, completely, and forever shared leadership, in which everyone is a key player in all our decisions. Anyone invited to study and join us, and whose identity we are certain of, has the right/duty to vote—informed and therefore competent—on all possibilities and all foreseeable consequences, fully, freely, and independently, expressing themselves openly and with reason, assuming full responsibility for all consequences, everything that concerns our entire system.

Only those with a verified and guaranteed identity have the right to decide, for obvious reasons: first, to be able to vote and freely express one's preferences, in almost all civilized countries, one must first be identified. DirectDemocracyS recognizes the main identity documents in every country in the world, hoping for mutual recognition and respect.

The second reason is to be able to "blame" those who are integral to our shared leadership for the consequences of their own decisions, those of various groups, and all our major constituents. Taking full responsibility, both individual and collective, "obliges" us to make calculated choices, to always decide in the best way, always with the good and protection of the interests of the entire world population as our objectives, always starting by helping those most in need first, most, and for the longest time. This rule is not to gain more consensus and more votes for us, but because it is the most logical, common-sense, fairest, just, useful, and reliable choice, for the good of all humanity.

The third reason is to be able to identify and reward our best users. We use about 33% of all our revenue to reward our best users and our best groups in various ways.

To implement all decisions made by our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities, using unique and inimitable rules and methodologies—thus, our grassroots—it was necessary to create a higher level of user (official members, and all subsequent higher-level user types). DirectDemocracyS perfectly, fairly, honestly , helpfully, orderly, organized, and securely accommodates two types of hierarchies. The classic one, in which the top of the "pyramid" is fair, just, and meritocratic, and holds more important roles and responsibilities. The pioneering, unique, innovative, and inimitable one, typical of our system, is where the grassroots decide, and the top of the hierarchy perpetually implements and carries out all the grassroots' decisions, by which it is managed and controlled. These two seemingly irreconcilable methodologies, however, thanks to very detailed rules, respected by all, they are optimally integrated, efficiently preventing any potential problem and avoiding, efficiently and continuously over time, any type of internal conflict.

A great help in implementing each of our rules and methodologies in the best possible way is the collective ownership rights of all our official members over our entire system. Since we all own everything, all our official members have a vested interest in ensuring everything runs smoothly, avoiding wasted time and, again, effectively preventing any potential internal conflict. Speaking of ownership, equality, and meritocracy, in our economic and financial activities, obviously, every single activity is owned by all those who propose it, discuss it, choose it, test it, vote on it, create it, implement it, manage it, and control it. In practice, individual and group percentages can vary based on the specific work, time, money, and resources invested by each person, and even each group, involved. In all our activities, of all kinds, the DirectDemocracyS system (composed of all our official members) must always hold at least 51%. However, investments and collaborations are possible, primarily internal, but in certain cases, based on detailed rules, also external, where the remaining 49% (or less, depending on the case) can be held by one or more people, or by various groups. Therefore, we want to clarify that in business, shared ownership concerns only the ownership portion of our system. This choice is to allow those with specific ideas and projects to invest and risk greater sums of their own, time, ideas, and labor, to rightfully obtain greater profits, to be shared with all those involved (members, managers, and workers), on the basis of equality and meritocracy. Just as our political representatives are managed and controlled by their voters/users, so too are our managers, who jointly manage our economic, financial, and other activities, directly controlled by our shareholders, fully informed by our specialist groups, who are in turn all our official members.

What are the reasons for this implementation, based on these rules?

Because DirectDemocracyS was not created to be for the few, but potentially for everyone, so we not only declare this property right, but we make it concrete.

Those who own a system, take care of it, work on it with greater care and passion, continuously over time, want to protect it, and want to make it better. And this applies to all our activities.

But why the name official members?

Our official members are also registered users with verified and guaranteed identities. By paying a higher annual fee, working harder and for longer, achieving more points, better tangible results, and demonstrating impeccable individual and group behavior, they jointly become owners of our entire system. They can also maintain multiple profile types, linked to their personal profile. This section on the various profile types is essential to understanding the rationale behind these rules, methodologies, and instructions.

Having greater potential, access to restricted areas, and more complete information, and, in addition to your own personal profile, one, but also, based on detailed rules on their use, all types of profiles, make all our members official, truly masters, of our entire system.

Regarding the political organization, official members are the only type of user who can request, and according to very detailed rules, obtain, a personal political profile, with their real public name and surname, and all the necessary capabilities to carry out political representation activities, to participate in our internal electoral campaigns and our closed online primaries. If successful, they will be able to participate as our political representatives and authorized candidates in electoral campaigns and real, external elections. If successful, they will represent our system and their constituents in the various institutions, advocating for the interests of the entire population, not just their own constituents, and not just our users. Obviously, as our political representatives, they will be continuously managed and monitored only by our users with verified and guaranteed identities, and exclusively by our platforms, for obvious security reasons. Alternatively, while maintaining all other activities and keeping all existing profiles active, you can decide to have a political profile, internal or external, without political representation roles outside our system, but to carry out political activities, including support and collaboration, with our political representatives, in various roles, some of which are very important.

Official members can have a system profile, meaning they have access to a wide range of activities—financial, economic, social, multimedia, even sports, and leisure activities, including volunteering—within our foundation. In this case, they gain access, if they meet all the requirements, according to detailed rules, to numerous subdomains and their related websites within our platform.

They can have many types of profiles, and can obtain, based on detailed rules, higher user types, to have more important roles, and greater responsibility in our system.

With all this potential, which increases gradually and over time, also based on the points earned, specific activities, and one's behavior, the controls also increase, not only of one's identity, but also of one's economic and financial situation, to prevent any potential problems.

Those who have nothing to hide, and those who have always been in compliance, have nothing to fear, because, although they often seem excessive and very invasive, our controls are discreet, and nothing has been, is, or will ever be made public, or shared with people, or with unreliable technologies.

Anyone can gain access to restricted areas, to more prestigious and important groups, to more detailed information, and to positions of greater responsibility and power. Therefore, as we always repeat, equality is always guaranteed, continuously and completely, but always respecting meritocracy and all our rules, methods, and instructions.

Everything was done this way, for very good reasons, and is the result of long and hard work, but also continuous integration, of ideas and projects, to ensure continuous evolution, and continuous innovation, to guarantee, forever for everyone, the best system, and the best political force, in the history of humanity.

The New User Activation group, along with the New User Activation group, all special groups, and all participating groups, including their various categories and subgroups, officially announce this public message.

According to our rules, people from all over the world can join us, with virtually no discrimination, according to the rules we all know.

First, a very important explanation of the user types, which for convenience we divide into two broad categories: advanced and advanced. The advanced categories include the free category, and other categories based on the required capabilities, the activities desired, personal preferences, and financial means of those who wish to join us.

So we have various lower-level user types, some free, with no extensive verification (we only verify that you have a personal, well-protected, and not a temporary email address, and a valid, working phone number), no attendance requirement (you can come and go whenever you want, and stay as long as you like), and very few mandatory activities (all for the benefit of our users, to be completed upon first login in our reserved areas). Obviously, there's less potential, and fewer activities available, than for the higher-level user types.

When we classify user types into superior and inferior, we are not referring to individual or group qualities, skills, professional abilities, culture, reliability, loyalty, and we are not judging people based on their own free, personal choices as a given user type.

The only major difference between lower and higher levels is that higher levels, for obvious reasons, are activated on a limited basis, based on waiting lists, with various requirements, but also a certain number of points, a certain behavior, and specific activities previously completed within our system. This invitation allows us to have the guarantee of a verified and guaranteed identity, and the assumption of full and continuous responsibility for each activity performed and for the behavior of the invited person by the person within our system who invites them.

In the early stages, there was only one type of user, and we worked hard for many years to create our fundamental rules.

After partially making our system public, the user types already envisaged by our fundamental rules were two (administrators and new users), and currently there are many more, and many more will be created at any time, in the subsequent phases, based on our needs and wishes.

While our hierarchies are rigid, they are not discriminatory; in fact, based on very detailed implementing rules, anyone who meets the requirements, and anyone who demonstrates merit, can become a super administrator, at any level, at any stage.

People are not all the same, and they do not all join us with good intentions.

We use the restricted access system to effectively prevent any potential sabotage by powerful, wealthy, and famous individuals and lobbies. With a small initial investment, they could enlist many front men as our higher-level users, attempting to somehow (impossible given our rules, methodologies, and instructions) take control of our system. Don't worry, we've already planned for everything and taken all the necessary security measures to avoid any potential problems.

Unfortunately, waiting lists often form as a result of the limited number of members. Only 10% of our official members and 10% of our registered users, with verified and guaranteed identities, are available to invite new people.

Although the number of users to be invited at each stage is constantly increasing, new invitations cannot be made until all official members and all users with verified and guaranteed identities from all previous stages have been welcomed in the best possible way, informed, and fully integrated into our system.

Official invitations are very important, and we've talked about them before, to ensure a safe, orderly, and organized system, with reliable people, to achieve the best results.

The lower types, despite having less potential, are very useful, both for us to be able to evaluate the abilities, merits, and individual behaviors, also thanks to our individual and group points, and for the users themselves, who, based on their activities, and their behavior, will be able to accumulate points, to be able to request, and obtain if they have all the requirements, official invitations, and then, higher types of users.

Very soon, also due to the huge number of people who will join us, it will not be possible to directly obtain a higher user type, but it will be mandatory, and without any differentiation, to start from a lower user type. According to the previous rules, one will have to demonstrate one's worthy of a higher user type than one's own, through long and hard work, impeccable behavior, and a certain number of points (earned through concrete activities), both individually and in various groups.

Of course, you can't just move up the ranks; in many cases, for disciplinary reasons, lack of concrete results, or lack of consistency, you can lose not only points, but also ranks.

Our hierarchies aren't just achieved; they must be maintained over time, with excellent results and impeccable behavior. This method also allows us to rotate through roles of greater responsibility, not only through disciplinary measures, but also by effectively and directly creating new roles of greater responsibility and importance, to complement existing ones.

Over time, the various user types not only increase the "power" of each of our users, but also allow them greater potential, more information, reserved areas, and participation in larger groups at various levels and of various types.

Our methodology, with these detailed rules and related instructions, all have obvious reasons, which we don't want to repeat. You'll all have understood them.

Under no circumstances will anyone be discriminated against; anyone can join us at any time with a free personal profile and move up one user level at a time, based on their merits. Therefore, equality and meritocracy, always united and consistent over time, is not a slogan, but, like everything we say, a reality in our system.

The awarding of points to individuals and groups is not discriminatory, even though points have different values on different websites depending on the type of user. This is normal, and no one is stopping anyone from demonstrating their potential and moving up our ranks.

Unlike all other systems, there is no favoritism, and it is not individual people who decide, but many groups, and based on very detailed rules that are the same for everyone.

One of the advantages of DirectDemocracyS is that every person, if they are our official members, owns, along with all the other official members, our entire system and all our activities. Even a free user can immediately begin accumulating points and concrete results, and if they maintain impeccable behavior, they can achieve very significant goals.

Many people, unfamiliar with us, may judge our system to be too complicated, and mistakenly believe that we discriminate against new users.

They say this without knowing us, and not being part of DirectDemocracyS, so we forgive their ignorance.

A system like ours, currently 100% humane, would be impossible to manage without the right precautions, also because of the hatred that those who exploit all other systems for their own advantage, and even anti-system groups, will feel for us, finding invented, not real, reasons to be against us.

With our technological program, and the gradual but concrete, continuous, and useful integration of existing and future artificial intelligences into allddsAI, which, combined, will be managed in our system by our artificial intelligence ddsAI, as the official interface for our users, and for our groups, we will achieve practically infinite computing power, and therefore better results, for the good of all.

With or without technology, with or without the internet, our more than 10 million micro-organizations, in urban and rural areas, with up to 1,000 inhabitants, will allow us a complete, physical presence in every territory.

With 20 minutes of daily activity from many types of users, not just seniors, our enormous mechanism will continue to function optimally, whether with thousands, millions, or even billions of people. More people, more people working and, why not, having fun together, in DirectDemocracyS.

Likewise, thanks to our intelligent rules and careful management of our revenue and investments, through annual dues, voluntary donations, and advertising contracts, we will experience continuous growth, always maintaining and renewing the best technologies, always preserving our complete freedom, authentic democracy, neutrality, and non-negotiable independence. More users, more revenue, of which 33% goes to security measures and technology, 335% to reward our best users, 33% to investments and growth, and 1% to reward our creators, creators, and guarantors.

Regardless of the number of users, our system will always be able to support any activity, functioning optimally.

And it's all thanks to the complexity and completeness of our rules, our methodologies, our detailed instructions, all with impeccable rationale.

Simply put, everything we do, how we do it, has been decided by everyone, for the good of all.