Accessibility Tools

DirectDemocracyS
Global Political Organization · Real Direct Democracy
COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM
FOR THE TRANSFORMATION OF MEXICO
Political · Economic · Financial · Social · Environmental
Critical analysis of reality · Concrete and verifiable solutions
Based on logic, common sense, study, reality, truth, coherence, and mutual respect
2025 Edition — Strategic Reference Document
public.directdemocracys.org
DirectDemocracyS (DDS) is not a traditional political party. It does not seek power to wield it for the benefit of an elite. It does not make empty promises. It does not use the language of demagoguery or hollow rhetoric. We are a pioneering, global political organization, radical in the best sense of the word: we get to the root of the problems, without beating around the bush or making concessions to established interests.
This document analyzes Mexico with complete honesty. It names what is wrong, identifies the root causes, and proposes concrete, viable, measurable solutions with defined timelines. We don't offer utopian ideals: we offer programs that work, backed by evidence, logic, and mutual respect for every Mexican citizen.
The guiding principle is simple: a country belongs to its citizens, not its rulers. Collective wealth must be managed collectively, with complete transparency, ongoing accountability, and direct participation from every individual. There is no other path to true democracy.
NOTE: This program is not final or immutable. It is a starting point that is refined through the active participation of Mexican citizens on the DDS platform. Each proposal can be improved, criticized, and voted on directly by those who experience its consequences.
Mexico formally has a federal representative democracy. In practice, the system concentrates power in three mutually reinforcing and protective nodes: the Federal Executive with vast extra-constitutional powers; the political parties that function as private enterprises for state capture; and the economic power groups that finance both. The result is a facade democracy where the vote changes the names but not the structures.
The Congress of the Union—comprised of 500 deputies and 128 senators—rarely legislates for the benefit of the citizenry. Party discipline transforms legislators into party operatives, not representatives of the people. Most of the laws passed benefit identifiable interest groups. Ninety-five percent of Mexican citizens have never directly participated in any real political decision that affects them.
STRUCTURAL PROBLEM: The Mexican electoral system allows 0.001% of the population—party leaders, donors, and operatives—to determine which options are offered to voters. Citizens choose from options they did not select. That is not democracy: it is a managed simulation.
Mexico is the world's 12th largest economy by nominal GDP (approximately $1.4 trillion in 2024), which should guarantee widespread well-being. It doesn't. The reason is the structurally unequal distribution of that wealth.
|
GDP per capita (PPP) |
~11,000 USD/year — 75th percentile worldwide, but extremely unevenly distributed |
|
Gini coefficient |
0.45 — one of the highest in Latin America. The richest 10% hold 64% of the national wealth. |
|
Multidimensional poverty |
46% of the population (CONEVAL 2022) — approximately 55 million people |
|
Extreme poverty |
8.9 million people without simultaneous access to food, health, housing, or minimum income |
|
Informal employment |
56% of the workforce — without social protection, without a guaranteed pension, without real labor rights |
|
Estimated tax evasion |
300 billion pesos annually — one third of the federal education budget |
|
Public debt |
50.5% of GDP — manageable in absolute terms, but growing and poorly invested |
|
Estimated capital flight |
$60-80 billion annually — a figure that exceeds the foreign direct investment received |
These numbers are not statistical accidents. They are the predictable result of policies consciously designed to transfer public wealth to privileged private actors.
Mexico has recorded between 28,000 and 33,000 intentional homicides annually since 2018—more than many countries in a state of open war. Official figures systematically underestimate the true extent of the violence due to methodological manipulation of investigation files and the high rate of unreported crimes (estimated at 92% by INEGI).
There are approximately 200 organized criminal groups operating within the country, with an effective presence in 83% of its municipalities. The state has not lost its monopoly on violence; in many regions, it never had it. Police and judicial corruption is not an exception to the system; it is an inherent part of its functioning.
CRITICAL FACT: According to the 2023 ENVIPE survey, 66% of Mexicans consider living in their city unsafe. This perception is not irrational: it is a rational, adaptive response to verifiable, objective risk conditions.
The militarized model of public security adopted since 2006 has empirically proven ineffective. More militarization does not produce less violence when the structural causes—inequality, impunity, institutional corruption, lack of opportunities—remain untouched.
Mexico invests 4.3% of its GDP in education—below the OECD average (5.0%). The 2022 PISA tests placed Mexico among the lowest-performing OECD countries in reading comprehension, mathematics, and science. The Mexican education system operates at two different levels: elite private schools that produce internationally competitive professionals, and public schools that, with a few notable exceptions, perpetuate the poverty of their students.
Functional illiteracy—people who can read but don't understand what they read—affects 43% of the adult population, according to estimates from INEA. This isn't a problem of collective intelligence: it's the result of a system designed to produce obedient workers, not critical citizens.
Mexico operates a fragmented healthcare system comprised of three subsystems with radically different levels of quality: the IMSS for formal sector workers (partial coverage, overcrowded); the ISSSTE for government employees (better coverage, also limited); and state-run services for everyone else—underfunded, with outdated equipment and insufficient staff. Twenty-one percent of the population has no formal healthcare coverage whatsoever.
Maternal mortality in indigenous states is three times the national average. The elimination of the Seguro Popular program and the chaotic creation of the IMSS-Bienestar program have worsened access to medicines in rural areas. This is not a statistic: it is a death sentence.
Mexico ranks 126th out of 180 in Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index (2023). Corruption in Mexico is not a dysfunction of the system; it is a function of the system. It operates as a reverse redistribution mechanism, transferring public resources to private actors connected to political power.
DIRECT CONSEQUENCE: Annual losses due to corruption amount to 9% of GDP—approximately 900 billion pesos. Each year, this is equivalent to not building 200 hospitals, 2,000 schools, or 50,000 km of roads. It is a political choice, not a natural disaster.
Mexico's problems are not new. Nor are the analyses. What has been historically lacking is a transformation model that is simultaneously: radical in its diagnosis (getting to the root of the problem), realistic in its solutions (based on what works), democratic in its method (decisions made by those who live with them), and coherent in its execution (not giving in to vested interests).
DirectDemocracyS proposes exactly that. Not as a rigid ideology, but as a governance system based on verifiable principles: collective ownership of what belongs to everyone, direct citizen decision-making on public affairs, shared and rotating leadership, and ongoing accountability—not just every six years in a ballot box.
DDS organizes citizen participation in primary groups of 5 people, which are then articulated into groups of 25, 125, and 625, up to the national level. This fractal model ensures that no decision is made by someone disconnected from its real impact. Applied to Mexico:
This model is not utopian: it is a technological update of direct democracy made possible by the digital scale. The difference from previous models is that DDS implements it systematically and comprehensively, with triple identity verification and protected anonymity.
The 1917 Political Constitution of the United Mexican States—with its more than 700 amendments—has lost internal coherence. Each administration modifies it to suit its own agenda, creating a contradictory text that no citizen fully understands. DDS proposes convening a Citizen Constituent Assembly.
Composition: 500 delegates selected through a verified citizen lottery, with guaranteed representation from all regions, age groups, genders, and Indigenous peoples. No active member of a political party may participate. The assembly deliberates for 18 months with complete transparency and real-time citizen access.
INTERNATIONAL EXAMPLE: Iceland conducted a citizen-led constitutional process in 2010-2011 with direct participation through digital platforms. The resulting text enjoyed greater democratic legitimacy than any constitution drafted by political elites.
Any decision with a national impact exceeding 500 billion pesos must be submitted to a binding citizen referendum. Decisions with a state or municipal impact follow the same principle at the municipal level.
The National Electoral Institute in its current form is a costly, politicized, and easily captured organization. Its council members are appointed by the very political powers they are meant to oversee—an insurmountable structural contradiction.
The Mexican judiciary is the weakest link in the democratic system. Lower courts are systematically infiltrated by organized crime in many regions.
DDS WARNING: The recently proposed popular election of judges is a demagogic reform that exacerbates the problem. A judge who needs votes to win cannot deliver impartial justice: they need to act politically to be re-elected. Judicial independence is built on selection based on demonstrated merit, not on electoral campaigns.
Mexico is nominally a federal state, but it operates as a hypercentralized system where the federal executive controls tax revenue sharing and can informally discipline governors through budget management. DDS proposes genuine fiscal federalism.
Specific proposal: each state retains 60% of the taxes generated within its territory. The Federal Fund is financed with the remaining 40%, earmarked exclusively for functions of national interest. Municipalities receive 30% of local tax revenue directly, bypassing state control.
VERIFIABLE CONSEQUENCE: A municipality that knows 30% of its revenue stays locally has direct incentives to combat local tax evasion, attract investment, and improve services. Currently, it lacks this structural incentive.
The Mexican economy suffers from two major structural problems. The first is concentration: 16 economic groups control 40% of non-governmental GDP. The second is dependency: 81% of exports go to the United States, and 35% of Mexican GDP depends directly on U.S. demand. A slowdown in the U.S. triggers a recession in Mexico, without Mexican citizens having any say in the matter.
Mexico collects 16% of its GDP in taxes—one of the lowest percentages in the OECD (average: 34%). This isn't due to a lack of wealth, but rather a lack of political will to tax those who have it. The effective corporate income tax rate (after deductions, exemptions, and tax consolidation) hovers around 12% for large corporations, while formal sector workers pay marginal rates of 30-35%. This is a perverse inversion of tax justice.
Total additional revenue estimated from the tax reform: between 400,000 and 600,000 million pesos annually — equivalent to multiplying by 1.5 the current combined budget for health and education.
Mexico has deindustrialized rapidly since NAFTA (1994). Strategic sectors that could be produced locally are being massively imported. Post-COVID nearshoring represents a historic opportunity that is being missed due to a lack of proactive industrial policy.
|
Basic Semiconductors |
Technology partnership with ASEAN and the EU for the production of 28nm+ chips — useful for Mexico without requiring the global technological frontier |
|
Renewable energies |
Domestic production of solar panels and wind turbines — Mexico has the second best solar irradiation in the world and uses it at 4% of its potential |
|
Basic Pharmaceuticals |
Restore production capacity for generic active ingredients — currently 85% is imported from China and India |
|
Value-added agri-food |
Transforming raw materials into processed products with 5-10x greater added value — today Mexico exports raw avocados and imports packaged guacamole |
|
Digital infrastructure |
National fiber optic network in 5 years for the 2,500 rural municipalities currently without quality connectivity |
|
Popular construction |
Social housing program using national materials and earthquake-resistant technology — 8 million households with active housing deficit |
Nacional Financiera (NAFIN) and the National Foreign Trade Bank (Bancomext) are merging into a single National Development Bank with a clear mandate: to finance national SMEs in strategic sectors at preferential rates, with criteria of employment, innovation and regional impact — not speculative profitability.
Initial capitalization: 500 billion pesos from the tax reform. Portfolio target: 3 trillion pesos in productive credit over 10 years. Conditionality: each peso loaned to a private company is conditional upon verified formal employment, a real minimum wage, and social security coverage.
The Mexican energy debate is poisoned by two symmetrical fallacies: the neoliberal one (privatize everything because the market is always more efficient) and the nationalist-populist one (nationalize everything because the public sector is always better). Reality demands pragmatism based on evidence.
Mexico's 81% dependence on exports to the US is an unacceptable geopolitical vulnerability. Mexico needs to diversify with concrete goals: 25% of exports to Latin America within 15 years; a deep trade agreement with the European Union with binding technology transfer; an investment framework with India for medium-technology manufacturing; and an active commercial presence in sub-Saharan Africa.
The Mexican banking system is profitable for its owners—mostly foreign: BBVA, Santander, Citigroup, and HSBC control 72% of banking assets—and extremely expensive for its users. Mexico has one of the highest bank spreads in Latin America. The profits of the four largest foreign banks in Mexico exceed 200 billion pesos annually. Most of those profits leave the country.
UNCOMFORTABLE FACT: Mexicans use their savings to finance dividends paid to shareholders in Madrid, New York, and London. This isn't inevitable; it's the result of regulations designed to allow it.
Education is the only instrument that can sustainably break the intergenerational cycle of poverty. Everything else is just a band-aid. However, transforming the education system is politically difficult because it threatens entrenched interests.
Neuroscience is conclusive: 80% of brain development occurs before age 6. Mexico has early childhood education coverage of only 43%. The remaining children arrive at primary school with irreversible learning gaps. This is not a biological inevitability: it is the result of failing to invest where it matters.
The fragmentation of the Mexican healthcare system is its main flaw. Three parallel systems, with three sets of infrastructure, three staff payrolls, and three drug procurement systems—resulting in constant and costly lack of coordination.
Fifty years of the 'war on drugs' in Mexico have empirically demonstrated that the punitive-militarized model does not work. Consumption has not decreased, violence has increased, criminal organizations have become more sophisticated, and the state has spent ever-increasing resources to achieve diminishing results. This is not an ideological opinion: it is the result of decades of academic research in criminology, public health, and the economics of crime.
DDS adopts the position supported by scientific evidence: drug use is a public health problem, not a crime. Criminalizing users does not reduce consumption and increases the vulnerability of addicts.
Criminal groups in Mexico launder between $25 billion and $43 billion annually. Without this ability to launder money, criminal organizations would fall apart. Combating money laundering is more effective than militarization because it attacks the criminal economy.
Mexico is one of the world's 17 megadiverse countries—possessing 12% of global terrestrial biodiversity on just 1.4% of the planet's surface. This wealth is simultaneously an extraordinary asset and a responsibility that the State has systematically failed to fulfill.
|
Annual deforestation |
70,000 hectares/year — equivalent to losing 100 football fields every hour |
|
Access to rural drinking water |
37% of the rural population lacks access to quality drinking water |
|
Overexploitation of aquifers |
105 of the 653 national aquifers are critically overexploited |
|
Air pollution |
Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Monterrey exceed PM2.5 standards more than 200 days a year |
|
Solid waste |
30% of municipal waste ends up in open dumps |
|
GHG emissions |
Mexico produces 1.5% of global emissions — with an increasing trend |
'Fair' means that the transition is not paid for by those who least caused it. Fossil fuel workers and lower-income households require specific protection during the transition process.
Mexico has 68 recognized Indigenous peoples, representing 21.5% of the population—approximately 25 million people. Statistically, they rank at the bottom in all well-being indices: education, health, income, and life expectancy. This position is neither accidental nor the result of supposed cultural incapacity. It is the documented result of centuries of territorial dispossession, the destruction of their own systems of governance, and structural discrimination.
Mexico shares a 3,145 km border with the world's leading power and simultaneously leads the Latin American hemisphere. This geographic position is a source of both opportunities and asymmetrical pressures. Managing this duality requires a foreign policy with clear principles, not one of subservience or unproductive confrontation.
No real transformation of this scale happens simultaneously. DDS proposes a phased plan with verifiable goals, identified funding, and corrective mechanisms built in from the design stage.
|
PHASE |
PERIOD |
NAME |
MAIN PRIORITIES |
|
PHASE 1 |
Years 1-2 |
Foundations |
Tax reform, anti-corruption, electoral reform, basic security, immediate social emergency |
|
PHASE 2 |
Years 3-6 |
Construction |
Integrated health system, comprehensive education reform, judicial reform, active industrial policy |
|
PHASE 3 |
Ages 7-12 |
Consolidation |
Real federalism, energy transition, indigenous autonomy, external diversification |
|
PHASE 4 |
Ages 13-20 |
Maturity |
Systemic evaluation, participatory adjustments, second generation of citizen reforms |
The program does not require additional debt. It is financed with three identified and quantified sources:
|
Tax reform — additional revenue |
400,000 - 600,000 million pesos annually |
|
Reduction of corruption — direct savings |
250,000 - 400,000 million pesos annually |
|
Budget reallocation — efficiency |
150,000 - 200,000 million pesos annually |
|
TOTAL ADDITIONAL AVAILABLE |
800,000 - 1,200,000 million pesos annually |
|
Total cost of the program (phases 1-2) |
700,000 - 900,000 million pesos annually |
|
PROJECTED BALANCE |
POSITIVE — surplus allocated to the Intergenerational Sovereign Fund |
COMPARATIVE REFERENCE: Evidence from countries that have implemented similar tax reforms (Scandinavia 1950-1970, Costa Rica 1948-1980, Portugal post-1974) shows that the economic benefits of less corruption, higher education, and better health outweigh the implementation costs by a ratio of 3:1 over 10 years.
DDS doesn't make promises without indicators. Each objective has a quantifiable metric, a deadline, and political consequences if it isn't met.
|
AIM |
BASELINE 2024 |
GOAL |
TERM |
|
Reduce extreme poverty |
8.9% of the population |
2% or less |
8 years |
|
Tax revenue as a percentage of GDP |
16% of GDP |
22% of GDP |
6 years |
|
Universal health coverage |
79% of the population |
100% |
10 years |
|
Reduce intentional homicides |
26 per 100,000 inhabitants |
Less than 15 per 100,000 |
8 years |
|
Higher education coverage |
38% of the population |
70% |
10 years |
|
Renewable energy generation |
9% of total generation |
55% |
10 years |
|
Eliminate functional illiteracy |
43% of the adult population |
Less than 10% |
10 years |
|
Corruption Perceptions Index |
Ranked 126th out of 180 countries |
Among the top 50 |
10 years |
The program is reviewed annually with direct citizen participation. The results for each indicator are published monthly on a publicly accessible platform. Each political leader has verifiable individual targets. Repeated non-compliance triggers the citizen recall mechanism.
This isn't about punishing honest failure; it's about eliminating the pretense of success. An official who makes a mistake and acknowledges it deserves a chance to correct it. An official who fakes results deserves immediate and permanent punishment.
Mexico has everything it needs to be a prosperous, just, and democratic country. It has territory, natural resources, extraordinary biodiversity, a strategic geographic location, one of the most economically active diasporas in the world, an ancient culture, and a young, creative, and hardworking population.
What has been lacking is not talent or resources: what has been lacking is a system of governance that puts those resources at the service of everyone, and not just a minority connected to political power. What has been lacking is real democracy—not its simulation.
DirectDemocracyS is not here to offer a leader who will solve everything. It is here to build the system that makes leaders truly accountable, that ensures collective decisions are made collectively, and that the wealth produced by everyone is distributed in a way that leaves no one excluded from basic dignity.
This program is not the end of the debate: it's the beginning of the real conversation. Every proposal can be criticized, improved, and voted on directly. That's not weakness—it's the only honest way to do politics.
Mexico deserves real democracy. Mexican citizens are ready. The system must follow them.
DirectDemocracyS — Global Political Organization
public.directdemocracys.org
Open access document — reproduction permitted with attribution
When you subscribe to the blog, we will send you an e-mail when there are new updates on the site so you wouldn't miss them.
Comments