The system and those who compose it

Why the architecture serves the humanity outside, by empowering the humans within.

"By applying our rules to the letter, the good of those inside automatically becomes good for those outside."

Many people who study, or have already studied, the DirectDemocracyS system wonder whether the system itself is more important, or those who are part of it?

Our response, like many of our others, will surprise you. Those who are on the outside, and not part of it. DirectDemocracyS was created to have concrete, beneficial effects for the entire world population, for all peoples of the earth, without preferences or exclusions. One of the fundamental rules is that in all our activities, in every decision, and in every vote, the interests of the entire population, and of all humanity, must be present.

Given the previous premise, if we were to answer the question by choosing between our system and those who compose it, the honest, direct, and obvious answer is that we always choose the interests of all those who join us. These interests, however, are made effective, concrete, and applied by a constant and complete respect for all our rules, our methodologies, our instructions, and our motivations.

In short, it is by correctly and completely applying the DirectDemocracyS system that the common good is achieved, both for those who are not part of it and for those who are an active and integral part of it.

For those who ask: who guarantees that all this is really like this?

All those who join us under very detailed implementing rules guarantee that every single word we say, and every decision we make by voting on it, is consistently and completely applied by everyone, exactly as it was made public, both internally and externally. We don't have a single guarantee contract, but a collective responsibility, of everyone who joins us, that is worth more than any commitment. For those who have registered and joined us, and for those who have viewed our registration form, anyone who joins us must check a simple oath, which in a few words (the first) clearly specifies: you swear to always respect all the rules of DirectDemocracyS. By fully enforcing these rules, you not only ensure fairness and justice, but also the common good, both internally and externally.

To those who say: human beings are imperfect, or accuse DirectDemocracyS of being capable of failure, because people allow themselves to be corrupted, manipulated, or all try to obtain advantages and benefits, for themselves, and for their loved ones, what do we respond?

First of all, everyone is, and should forever be, free to think whatever they want, as long as it's based on reality, or expresses concepts with the premise: I have no proof, but I think that... If a person asserts their own opinion without proof, or without a premise, declaring that what they say has no basis in fact, other than a personal suspicion, they are not credible to all of us. It's like saying: I think it will rain today, without having analyzed the weather forecast. If they're lucky, their statement will come true and it will rain, and everyone will say they're an excellent fortune teller. Many will thank them for saving them from getting wet. If it doesn't rain, everyone will be able to claim they were wrong in their prediction, and whoever went out with an umbrella had to bring an umbrella with them, relying on forecasts that were completely invalid. Many will consider them unreliable. For these reasons, while we analyze with experts, even theories, suspicions, ideas, and all projects, even those with no evidence or expertise, even using our teams of specialists, DirectDemocracyS relies only on documented truth, from reliable and competent sources, tested and continuously verified, both as a single idea or proposal, and the people and groups that propose it. In practice, we are aware of human imperfection, especially individual imperfection, and for this reason, every activity and every decision we make is proposed individually, but immediately thereafter, we continue to integrate, propose, study, and implement, and then test, choose, and vote, in groups that can be composed of very many people, with the collaboration of many other groups, themselves composed of very many members, with the help, integration, and collaboration (including proactive and democratic) of all available technologies. This method makes everything we do professional, comprehensive, and extremely secure, and allows us to eliminate every human imperfection, even in a single individual, thanks to the help of humans and machines. These same rules, methodologies, instructions, and mechanisms make it virtually impossible for DirectDemocracyS to make mistakes, slow down, or fail. We might make tiny mistakes before finalizing our activities or decisions, but we always have the ability to prevent them. The reason is simple: so many people and machines verify every tiny detail, so the final result is incredibly close to perfection. When we initially described DirectDemocracyS as practically perfect, as an entire system, everyone said: arrogant, presumptuous, and vain, unaware of all the long, hard, complicated, yet professional work we've always done in this way: with commitment and concrete, ongoing contributions from everyone who joins us. It wasn't vanity: it was simply a statement of reality. People allow themselves to be corrupted, manipulated, and even managed and controlled by those who corrupt and manipulate them, but only if they are allowed to. Knowing that there were real possibilities for problems, we had to undertake a huge, lengthy, and complex preventive and remedial effort. It took many years to think through and find solutions to all these dangers, which could have jeopardized our system. With complex rules, impressive and impenetrable security measures, and two simple methodologies, we solved almost every possible problem: mutual management and verification, which allows for mutual control, and above all, to put the previous sentences into practice, the fact that we carry out virtually all our activities in a documented and verifiable manner, on our platforms and in person, even in our micro-groups. We not only use our technologies, which are owned by all our official members (and anyone, at the right time, who meets all the requirements can become our official member), but we meet physically, face to face, to carry out numerous activities and to decide everything freely, neutrally, professionally, concretely, freely, and authentically democratically. Microgroups are extremely important, and only a fundamental phase, planned from the very beginning but requiring a long time to implement, to prevent any potential problems. Cross-checks, implemented with pioneering yet highly efficient rules, and the work carried out on our platforms protect people from corruption and manipulation, making it impossible for anyone to attempt to cheat . Anyone who attempted this would be discovered and would lose collective trust, and it would be long, difficult, and very complicated to be forgiven by our collective system.

If everyone controls everything and everyone, what happens to privacy, and then in theory, infiltrators, front men, and bad people could discover secrets, and therefore boycott, slow down, or stop the system itself?

No system in the world is 100% foolproof, but ours is designed to make dishonest play more difficult and costly than in any other existing political organization.

Everyone monitors everything and everyone, comprehensively, reciprocally, continuously, and very securely, but with very detailed rules, state-of-the-art technologies, and above all, a highly effective methodology. By carrying out every activity in person (we know each other and verify each other directly, comprehensively, simply, and securely), working on our platforms, we leverage all our technologies and all our mutual verification teams. However, everything is verified in encrypted form, in tiny, impossible-to-decrypt, impossible-to-assemble parts. Let's simplify it: everyone verifies that a given activity is being performed properly, broken down into countless parts, entrusted to and controlled by countless people, and by countless technologies. All these humans and machines cannot individually trace the individuals committing violations or causing problems, so privacy is guaranteed, while still finding every error, fixing it immediately, and punishing the individual or individuals involved. We guarantee that this unique and inimitable method works perfectly and makes it impossible for anyone to exploit our system in ethically incorrect and morally wrong ways. However, wanting what's best for yourself and your loved ones isn't an absolute evil. For this reason, we offer numerous legal and therefore correct ways to earn money, rewards, services, and recognition, for yourself and others, individually and in groups, through our activities. These offer benefits and advantages, but we consistently and jointly apply: equality (therefore equal opportunities) with meritocracy (everything must be earned and deserved based on your concrete activities, measured by the points accumulated by everyone, individually and in groups, from the very beginning). Working, managing, and verifying everything, safely and securely, on our platforms, in a fully documented manner, not only protects everyone from any attempt at corruption and manipulation, and prevents boycotts, but also allows anyone to personally verify the real points and ensure the system is implemented on the basis of equality (equal for all) and meritocracy (rewarding the best). This makes the entire system fair and just, and encourages useful, fair, and honest competition, for the common good.

A strict, complicated, privacy-invasive system with too many rules. It doesn't allow everyone to express themselves freely. These are some potential criticisms of DirectDemocracyS. How do you respond?

The only ones who can know the truth are those who join us , who, after joining, are amazed by the fact that, internally, we are exactly as we declare to the outside world. There is total consistency between everything we say and everything we practice. Not a strict system, but a fair one, in which everyone respects rules agreed upon together. The foundations of DirectDemocracyS are simple, as are the fundamental rules, but to make everything work, very detailed implementing rules are needed, which prevent any potential problems and make everything run like clockwork. Privacy is protected for everyone at all times; we guarantee complete anonymity to everyone, and even invisibility both internally and externally. The rules are not excessive; they are just those necessary for a truly comprehensive system that works well. We allow everyone to express their potential, according to their abilities, freely, but while preserving public spaces. Our public spaces management group, of which anyone who is an official member can join upon request and meets all the requirements, is welcome. We don't allow anyone to fill public spaces with useless, distracting, or unauthorized posts. If you request and receive authorization, you can engage in virtually infinite activities, completely freely and in a truly democratic manner.

Could annual fees, identity verification, invitations to log in, full vetting, integrity testing, and an initial trust requirement scare off some potential users, making DirectDemocracyS seem dictatorial and therefore oppressive?

Everyone has the opportunity to join us forever, taking part in a wide range of activities and earning points immediately (25 initial points are given to each of our users upon activation, and are available to all user types). This free user level costs nothing, forever, and there are no attendance requirements or mandatory activities, except for setting your privacy settings, using two-factor authentication, and freely deciding how, when, and for what you receive our notifications. Total freedom doesn't mean breaking the rules, but rather being a respectful user, who will always be respected, supported, and fully informed.

"We are perfect not because we are superior beings, but because we have created rules that prevent our imperfections from doing harm."

If after reading all this you're still skeptical, the only way to find out is to join (even just as a free user, with no obligations) and see for yourself if we keep our promises.